Skip to main content

Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests and Recommendations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Computerized Tomographic Colonography
  • 1010 Accesses

Abstract

While colorectal cancer (CRC) is currently the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States [1], it is believed to be a highly preventable cancer. In the USA, it is now recommended that all asymptomatic persons over the age of 50 undergo screening of the colon and rectum. This review will focus only on the methods and evidence for screening asymptomatic individuals—patients with gastrointestinal symptoms fall into another, typically more aggressive diagnostic algorithm category. Despite the fact that excellent screening tests are available, the compliance rate with current screening recommendations in the USA varies between 35 and 65 % and is influenced by a multitude of factors [2, 3]. There are many controversial aspects surrounding the assertion that screening for colon cancer in the USA is less than ideal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cheng L, Eng C, Nieman LZ, Kapadia AS, Du XL. Trends in colorectal cancer incidence by anatomic site and disease stage in the United States from 1976 to 2005. Am J Clin Oncol. 2011;34(6):573–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sonnenberg A, Amorosi SL, Lacey MJ, Lieberman DA. Patterns of endoscopy in the United States: analysis of data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the National Endoscopic Database. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:489–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:638–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mitros FA. Polyps: the pathologist’s perspective. Semin Surg Oncol. 1995;11:379–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Watne AL. Colon polyps. J Surg Oncol. 1997;66:207–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE, McGee DL, Garewal H. Two-year incidence of colon adenomas developing after tandem colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:687–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Robert ME. The malignant colon polyp: diagnosis and therapeutic recommendations. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:662–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV, et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA. 2008;299:1027–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hiraoka S, Kato J, Fujiki S, et al. The presence of large serrated polyps increases risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1503–10, 1510.e1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gurudu SR, Heigh RI, De Petris G, et al. Sessile serrated adenomas: demographic, endoscopic and pathological characteristics. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:3402–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, et al. The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1603–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boyle T, Fritschi L, Heyworth J, Bull F. Long-term sedentary work and the risk of subsite-specific colorectal cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:1183–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weinstein SJ, Yu K, Horst RL, Ashby J, Virtamo J, Albanes D. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risks of colon and rectal cancer in Finnish men. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:499–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wasif N, Etzioni D, Maggard MA, Tomlinson JS, Ko CY. Trends, patterns, and outcomes in the management of malignant colonic polyps in the general population of the United States. Cancer. 2011;117:931–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Winzer BM, Whiteman DC, Reeves MM, Paratz JD. Physical activity and cancer prevention: a systematic review of clinical trials. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22:811–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang L, Wilson SE, Stewart DB, Hollenbeak CS. Marital status and colon cancer outcomes in US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries: does marriage affect cancer survival by gender and stage? Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;35:417–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang X, Smith-Warner SA, Chan AT, et al. Aspirin use, body mass index, physical activity, plasma C-peptide, and colon cancer risk in US health professionals. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174:459–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:544–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:627–37.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Wilschut J, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:659–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1365–71 [published erratum appears in N Engl J Med. 1993;329(9):672] [see comments].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1467–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Allison JE, Tekawa IS, Ransom LJ, Adrain AL. A comparison of fecal occult-blood tests for colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:155–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. van Rossum LG, van Rijn AF, Laheij RJ, et al. Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:82–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:1624–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim LS, Koch J, Yee J, Halvorsen R, Cello JP, Rockey DC. Comparison of patients’ experiences during imaging tests of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:67–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG. One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:555–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Provenzale D, Garrett JW, Condon SE, Sandler RS. Risk for colon adenomas in patients with rectosigmoid hyperplastic polyps. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:760–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rex DK, Smith JJ, Ulbright TM, Lehman GA. Distal colonic hyperplastic polyps do not predict proximal adenomas in asymptomatic average-risk subjects. Gastroenterology. 1992;102:317–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin OS, Gerson LB, Soon MS, Schembre DB, Kozarek RA. Risk of proximal colon neoplasia with distal hyperplastic polyps: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:382–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Laiyemo AO, Murphy G, Sansbury LB, et al. Hyperplastic polyps and the risk of adenoma recurrence in the polyp prevention trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:192–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Renaut AJ, Douglas PR, Newstead GL. Hyperplastic polyposis of the colon and rectum. Colorectal Dis. 2002;4:213–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hyman NH, Anderson P, Blasyk H. Hyperplastic polyposis and the risk of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:2101–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, Jacobson JS, Grann VR, Neugut AI. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:230–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sung JJ, Chan FK, Leung WK, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer in Chinese: comparison of fecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:608–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut. 2009;58:241–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Rockey DC, Koch J, Yee J, McQuaid KR, Halvorsen RA. Prospective comparison of air-contrast barium enema and colonoscopy in patients with fecal occult blood: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:953–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet. 2005;365:305–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Urbach DR, Rabeneck L. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Rickert A, Hoffmeister M. Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:22–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup [see comments]. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup [see comments]. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ransohoff DF. How much does colonoscopy reduce colon cancer mortality? Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:50–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Khiani VS, Soulos P, Gancayco J, Gross CP. Anesthesiologist involvement in screening colonoscopy: temporal trends and cost implications in the Medicare population. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(1):58–64.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rex DK. Reducing costs of colon polyp management. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1135–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, Li C, He J, Rabeneck L. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:452–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Toma J, Paszat LF, Gunraj N, Rabeneck L. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancer after barium enema and their risk factors: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:3142–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lieberman D. Progress and challenges in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2115–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1872–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Imperiale TF, Sox HC. Guidelines for surveillance intervals after polypectomy: coping with the evidence. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:477–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Laiyemo AO, Murphy G, Albert PS, et al. Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: predictive accuracy for advanced adenoma at 4 years. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:419–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Ransohoff DF. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:264–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ransohoff DF, Yankaskas B, Gizlice Z, Gangarosa L. Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance in community practice. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:2623–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lasisi F, Rex DK. Improving protection against proximal colon cancer by colonoscopy. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;5:745–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1865–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Zou H, Taylor WR, Harrington JJ, et al. High detection rates of colorectal neoplasia by stool DNA testing with a novel digital melt curve assay. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:459–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Ahlquist DA, Sargent DJ, Loprinzi CL, et al. Stool DNA and occult blood testing for screen detection of colorectal neoplasia. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:441–50, W81.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, Turnbull BA, Ross ME. Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2704–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Ahlquist DA, Skoletsky JE, Boynton KA, et al. Colorectal cancer screening by detection of altered human DNA in stool: feasibility of a multitarget assay panel. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1219–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Lind GE, Danielsen SA, Ahlquist T, et al. Identification of an epigenetic biomarker panel with high sensitivity and specificity for colorectal cancer and adenomas. Mol Cancer. 2011;10:85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Schoofs N, Deviere J, Van Gossum A. PillCam colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal tumor diagnosis: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy. 2006;38:971–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y, et al. Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2009;41:1026–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Van Gossum A, Munoz-Navas M, Fernandez-Urien I, et al. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:264–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sieg A, Friedrich K, Sieg U. Is PillCam COLON capsule endoscopy ready for colorectal cancer screening? A prospective feasibility study in a community gastroenterology practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:848–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Sacher-Huvelin S, Coron E, Gaudric M, et al. Colon capsule endoscopy vs. colonoscopy in patients at average or increased risk of colorectal cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:1145–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Rokkas T, Papaxoinis K, Triantafyllou K, Ladas SD. A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:792–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Spada C, Hassan C, Marmo R, et al. Meta-analysis shows colon capsule endoscopy is effective in detecting colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:516–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Bunger S, Haug U, Kelly FM, et al. Toward standardized high-throughput serum diagnostics: multiplex-protein array identifies IL-8 and VEGF as serum markers for colon cancer. J Biomol Screen. 2011;16:1018–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Ward DG, Suggett N, Cheng Y, et al. Identification of serum biomarkers for colon cancer by proteomic analysis. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1898–905.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Walgenbach-Brunagel G, Burger B, Leman ES, et al. The use of a colon cancer associated nuclear antigen CCSA-2 for the blood based detection of colon cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2008;104:286–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Ran Y, Hu H, Zhou Z, et al. Profiling tumor-associated autoantibodies for the detection of colon cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:2696–700.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Don C. Rockey M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rockey, D.C. (2013). Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests and Recommendations. In: Cash, B. (eds) Colorectal Cancer Screening and Computerized Tomographic Colonography. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5943-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5943-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5942-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5943-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics