Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act in Disability Evaluations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Guide to Mental Disability Evaluations

Abstract

Mental health professionals may perform disability evaluations for cases involving the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. The ADA requires an employee to demonstrate substantial limitation in one or more major life activities in order to invoke the ADA’s protection. The ADA Amendments Act (ADAAA) of 2008 significantly expanded the ADA’s coverage, such that more individuals will meet the statutory requirements to be considered “disabled” under the ADA. Clinicians should have a basic understanding of the recently amended ADA so that they can help patients who may need to invoke the ADA’s protection in order to continue working. Forensic experts may also be asked to assist in ADA cases, as expert witnesses or as consultants, before disputes have escalated to litigation. The mental health professional can help to determine how an employee’s psychiatric impairment (if any) affects occupational functioning, whether the employee poses a direct threat in the workplace, and whether any reasonable accommodations may enable the worker to overcome any functional impairments in performing his or her job. With the enactment of the ADAAA in 2008 and the publication of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s final interpretive rules in 2011, demand for assistance from behavioral health professionals in ADA cases will likely increase in the next several years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Americans with Disabilities Act, Pub. Law No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 327 (1990), 42 U.S.C. §12101 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act, Pub. Law No. 110-325, 122 Stat. 3553 (2008), 42 U.S.C. §12101 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertson’s, Inc. v. Kirkingburg, 527 U.S. 555 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Battle v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 438 F.3d 856 (8th Cir. 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazelon Center. Press Release: President signs ADA Amendments Act, Sept 25, 2008. http://www.bazelon.org/newsroom/2008/9-18-08ADAA.htm (2008). Accessed 25 July 2011

  • Bertagna, B.R.: The internet: Disability or distraction? An analysis of whether “internet addiction” can qualify as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Hofstra Labor Employ. Law J. 25, 419–481 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolstein v. Reich, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 731, 3 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1761 (D.D.C. 1995), motion for summary affirmance granted, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32536 (D.C. Cir. 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen v. Department of Transportation, 282 F.3d 839 (D.C. Cir. 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown v. Cox Med. Ctrs., 286 F.3d 1040 (8th Cir. 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 246 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Center, C., Imparato, A.J.: Redefining “disability” discrimination: A proposal to restore civil rights protections for all workers. Stanf. Law Policy Rev. 14, 321–345 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, G.T., Phillips, P.J.: Overview of reasonable accommodation and the shifting emphasis from who is disabled to who can work. Hamline Law Rev. 34, 469–502 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Despears v. Milwaukee County, 63 F.3d 635 (7th Cir. 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldblum, C.R., Barry, K., Benfer, E.A.: The ADA Amendments Act of 2008. Texas J. Civ. Liberties Civil Rights 13, 187–240 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields v. Lyng, 705 F. Supp. 1134 (D. Md. 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, W.E.: Forensic evaluation in Americans with Disabilities Act cases. In: Goldstein, A.M., Weiner, I.B. (eds.) Handbook of Psychology: Forensic Psychology, vol. 11, pp. 279–300. Wiley, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fram, D.K.: Practitioners’ note: The ADA Amendments Act: Dramatic changes in coverage. Hofstra Labor Employ. Law J. 26, 193–221 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagliardo v. Connaught Labs, Inc., 311 F.3d 565 (3d Cir. 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, A.H.: The Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act: Legal implications and the effect on employer-employee relationships. La. Bar J. 59, 94–97 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, L.H.: The workplace. In: Simon, R.I., Gold, L.H. (eds.) Textbook of Forensic Psychiatry, 2nd edn, pp. 303–334. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, Washington, DC (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, L.H., Shuman, D.W.: Evaluating Mental Health Disability in the Workplace: Model, Process, and Analysis. Springer, New York (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, L.H., Anfang, S.A., Drukteinis, A.M., Metzner, J.L., Price, M., Wall, B.W., Wylonis, L., Zonana, H.V.: AAPL practice guideline for the forensic evaluation of psychiatric disability. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 36 (Suppl 4), S3–S50 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman-Delahunty, J.: Psychological impairment under the Americans with Disabilities Act: Legal guidelines. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract. 31(2), 197–205 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankins v. The Gap, 84 F.3d 797 (6th Cir. 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, P.A.: “Interacting with others” as a major life activity under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Seton Hall Circuit Rev. 2, 139–173 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensel, W.F.: Interacting with others: A major life activity under the Americans with Disabilities Act? Wis. Law Rev. 2002, 1139–1196 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickox, S.A.: The underwhelming impact of the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act. Univ. Baltimore Law Rev. 40, 419–494 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey v. Memorial Hospital Association, 239 F.3d 1128 (9th Cir. 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Husowitz v. Runyon, 942 F. Supp. 822 (E.D. N.Y. 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques v. DiMarzio, Inc., 386 F.3d 192 (2d Cir. 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakubowski v. The Christ Hospital, Inc., No. 09-4097 (6th Cir., 8 Dec, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis v. Potter, 500 F.3d 1113 (10th Cir. 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones v. Am. Postal Workers Union, 192 F.3d 417 (4th Cir. 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy v. Dresser Rand Co., 193 F.3d 120 (2d Cir. 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Keoughan v. Delta Airlines, No. 96-4072, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 12232 (10th Cir. 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, A.B.: Introducing the new and improved Americans with Disabilities Act: Assessing the ADA Amendments Act of 2008. Northwest. Univ. Law Colloquy 103(44), 217–229. http://www.law.northwestern.edu/lawreview/colloquy/2008/44/index.html (2008). Accessed 15 Nov 2011

  • Maes v. Henderson, 33 F. Supp.2d 1281 (D. Nev. 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Matejkovic, J.E., Matejkovic, M.E.: What is reasonable accommodation under the ADA? Not an easy answer; rather a plethora of questions. Miss. Coll. Law Rev. 28, 67–96 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie v. Benton, 388 F.3d 1342 (10th Cir. 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin v. Ashcroft, 337 F. Supp. 2d 1281 (D. Wyo. 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams v. Jefferson County, 463 F.3d 1113 (10th Cir. 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D.J., Price, M.: Forensic psychiatric assessments of behaviorally disruptive physicians. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 34(1), 72–81 (2006)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S.P.: Comment: Keeping the promise: The ADA and employment discrimination on the basis of psychiatric disability. Calif. Law Rev. 85, 701–747 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitka, M.: Federal government seeks to clarify the Americans with Disabilities Act. JAMA 300(8), 889 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mojtabai, R.: National trends in mental health disability, 1997–2009. Am. J. Public Health 101(11), 2156–2163 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton v. Reilly, 977 F.2d 1190 (7th Cir. 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pack v. Kmart Corp., 166 F.3d 1300 (10th Cir. 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paetzold, R.L.: Mental illness and reasonable accommodations at work: Definition of a mental disability under the ADA. Psychiatr. Serv. 56(10), 1188–1190 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ray v. Kroger, Co., 264 F. Supp.2d 1221 (S.D. Ga. 2003), aff’d, 90 Fed. Appx. 384 (11th Cir. 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Samper v. Providence St. Vincent Medical Center, No. 10-35811, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7278 (9th Cir., April 11, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • School Board of Nassau County v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I.Z., Rogers, E.S. (eds.): Work Accommodation and Retention in Mental Health. Springer, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C.E.: The Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008: Implications for the forensic psychiatrist. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 38, 95–99 (2010)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siber, L.: ADA Amendments Act of 2008: New hope for individuals with disabilities. Rutgers Law Rec. 33, 65–73 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R.I., Gold, L.H.: Psychiatric diagnosis in litigation. In: Simon, R.I., Gold, L.H. (eds.) Textbook of Forensic Psychiatry, 2nd edn, pp. 151–173. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, Washington, DC (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.M.: Who says you’re disabled? The role of medical evidence in the ADA definition of disability. Tulane Law Rev. 82, 1–76 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.M.: The paradox of personality: Mental illness, employment discrimination, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. George Mason Univ. Civil Rights Law J. 17, 79–156 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Solove, D.J.: The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet. Yale University Press, New Haven (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitelbaum, C., Thomas, P.: Post-traumatic stress disorder, employment discrimination, and direct threat claims. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 37(1), 109–111 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V.L., Gostin, L.O.: The Americans with Disabilities Act: Shattered aspirations and new hope. JAMA 301(1), 95–97 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, K.C.: Accommodating misconduct under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Fla. Law Rev. 57, 187–294 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, K.C.: Disability-related misconduct and the legal profession: The role of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Univ. Pittsburgh Law Rev. 69, 609–635 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. Regulations to implement the equal employment provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Federal Regist. 56, 35726 (26 July 1991), codified at 29 C.F.R. § 1630, rev. 1 July 2005. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_04/29cfr1630_04.html (1991). Accessed 29 July 2011

  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. EEOC enforcement guidance: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Psychiatric Disabilities. EEOC Notice No. 915.002, 1997. http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/psych.html (1997). Accessed 29 July 2011

  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. Enforcement guidance: Disability-related inquiries and medical examinations of employees under the Americans with Disabilities Act (27 July 2000, updated 24 March 2005). http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/guidance-inquiries.html (2000). Accessed 25 July 2011

  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. Americans with Disabilities Act: Questions and answers (Febr 2001, updated 9 Oct 2008). http://www.ada.gov/qandaeng.htm (2001). Accessed 25 July 2011

  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. Work at Home/Telework as a reasonable accommodation, 27 Oct 2005. http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/telework.html (2005). Accessed 25 Sept 2011

  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. Questions and answers on the final rule implementing the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (no date). http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/regulations/ada_qa_final_rule.cfm. Accessed 25 July 2011

  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. Reasonable accommodations for attorneys with disabilities (last modified 2 Febr 2011). http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/accommodations-attorneys.html (2011a). Accessed 31 Oct 2011

  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. Regulations to implement the equal employment provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended, 29 C.F.R. Part 1630, RIN 3046-AA85. Federal Regis. 76(58), 16978–17017 (2011b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwerling, C., Whitten, P.S., Sprince, N.L., Davis, C.S., Wallace, R.B., Blanck, P., Heeringa, S.G.: Workplace accommodations for people with disabilities: National health interview survey disability supplement, 1994–1995. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 45(5), 517–525 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Butler Hospital, 345 Blackstone Boulevard, Providence, RI, 02906, USA

    Patricia R. Recupero

  2. Maple Key Consulting, 910 Hope Street #5B, Stamford, CT, 06907-2322, USA

    Samara E. Harms

Authors
  1. Patricia R. Recupero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samara E. Harms
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia R. Recupero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Psychiatry, Georgetown University School of Medicine, N. Glebe Rd. 2501, Washington, DC, 22207, Vermont, USA

    Liza H. Gold

  2. PRMS, Inc., Risk Management, Wilson Blvd #700 1401, Arlington, 22209, Virginia, USA

    Donna L. Vanderpool

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Recupero, P.R., Harms, S.E. (2013). The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act in Disability Evaluations. In: Gold, L., Vanderpool, D. (eds) Clinical Guide to Mental Disability Evaluations. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5447-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation