Skip to main content

Open-Pit Mining with Uncertainty: A Conditional Value-at-Risk Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Optimization Theory, Decision Making, and Operations Research Applications

Abstract

The selection of a mine design is based on estimating net present values of all possible, technically feasible mine plans so as to select the one with the maximum value. It is a hard task to know with certainty the quantity and quality of ore in the ground. This geological uncertainty and also the future market behavior of metal prices and foreign exchange rates, which are always uncertain, make mining a high risk business. Value-at-Risk (VaR) is a measure that is used in financial decisions to minimize the loss caused by inadequate monitoring of risk. This measure does, however, have certain drawbacks such as lack of consistency, nonconvexity, and nondifferentiability. Rockafellar and Uryasev [J. Risk 2, 21–41 (2000)] introduce the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) measure as an alternative to the VaR measure. The CVaR measure gives rise to a convex optimization problem. An optimization model that maximizes expected return while minimizing risk is important for the mining sector as this will help make better decisions on the blocks of ore to mine at a particular point in time. We present a CVaR approach to the uncertainty involved in open-pit mining. We formulate investment and design models for the open-pit mine and also give a nested pit scheduling model based on CVaR. Several numerical results based on our models are presented by using scenarios from simulated geological and market uncertainties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdel Sabour, S.A., Dimitrakopoulos, R.G., Kumral, M.: Mine design selection under uncertainty. Mining Tech. 117, 53–64 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson, F., Mausser, H., Rosen, D., Uryasev, S.: Credit risk optimization with conditional value-at-risk criterion. Math. Program. Ser. B, 89, 273–291 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Carneiro, M.C., Ribas, G.P., Hamacher, S.: Risk management in the oil supply chain: a CVaR approach. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49, 3286–3294 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dimitrakopoulos, R., Farrelly, C., Godoy, M.C.: Moving forward from traditional optimisation: grade uncertainty and risk effects in open pit mine design. Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. Section A, Min. Ind. 111, A82–A89 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ferland, J.A., Amaya, J., Djuimo, M.S.: Application of a particle swarm algorithm to the capacitated open pit mining problem. In: Sen Gupta, G. (ed.) Autonomous Robots and Agents. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 76, pp. 127–133. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hochbaum, D., Chen, A.: Performance analysis and best implementations of old and new algorithms for the open-pit mining problem. Oper. Res. 48, 894–914 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Krokhmal, P., Palmquist, J., Uryasev, S.: Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints. J. Risk 4, 43–68 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lai, F.J., Bamford, W.E., Yuen, S.T.S., Li, T.: Implementing value at risk in slope risk evaluation. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Rock Slope Stability in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering, Santiago, Chile, pp. 1–10 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lasdon, L.S.: Optimization Theory for Large Systems. Dover, New York (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lerchs, H., Grossmann, I.F.: Optimum design of open-pit mines. Trans. Can. Inst. Min. Metall. LXVIII, 17–24 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lim, C., Sherali, H. D., Uryasev, S.: Portfolio optimization by minimizing conditional value-at-risk via nondifferentiable optimization. Comput. Optim. Appl. 46, 391–415 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Mansini, R., Ogryczak, W., Speranza, M. G.: Conditional value at risk and related linear programming models for portfolio optimization. Ann. Oper. Res. 152, 227–256 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez, L.A.: Why accounting for uncertainty and risk can improve final decision-making in strategic open pit mine evaluation. In: Project Evaluation Conference, Melbourne, pp. 1–12 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.: Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2, 21–41 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.: Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Bank. Finance 26, 1443–1471 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. West, J.: Decreasing metal ore grades. J. Ind. Ecol. 15, 165–168 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry Amankwah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Amankwah, H., Larsson, T., Textorius, B. (2013). Open-Pit Mining with Uncertainty: A Conditional Value-at-Risk Approach. In: Migdalas, A., Sifaleras, A., Georgiadis, C., Papathanasiou, J., Stiakakis, E. (eds) Optimization Theory, Decision Making, and Operations Research Applications. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 31. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5134-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics