Skip to main content

Vascular Access Closure Devices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Endovascular Interventions

Abstract

In 2002, an estimated six million interventional cardiology and endovascular procedures were performed in the USA, and that number exceeded 10.5 million in 2009. In most of these procedures, the common femoral artery is used as the cardiac access site. For each of these cases, vascular access management is a critical aspect to determining a successful outcome without complications. For many decades, manual compression has been the “gold standard” for postprocedure vascular access management. With the development of endovascular procedures, larger sheaths and more intense anticoagulation measures are now routinely employed. These factors place greater demands on the safe performance of vascular access. In addition, many patients are likely to undergo repeated angiographic procedures over time, most frequently using the femoral artery as the vascular entry point. Site selection, puncture and closure must be optimized to avoid access site complications, primarily related to bleeding. Vascular Closure Devices (VCDs) were designed to decrease time to achieve hemostasis, as well as access site bleeding, thus permitting shorter time to patient ambulation, and increased patient comfort compared with manual compression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schnyder G, Sawhney N, Whisenant B, et al. Common femoral artery anatomy is influenced by demographics and comorbidity: implications for cardiac and peripheral invasive studies. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;53:289–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dauerman H, Applegate R, Cohen D. Vascular closure devices – The second decade. J Am Coll Cardiol 2207;50:1617-1626

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tiroch KA, Arora N, Matheny ME, et al. Risk predictors of retroperitoneal hemorrhage following percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:1473–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitts J, Ver LP, Hofmaster P, et al. Fluoroscopy-guided femoral artery puncture reduces the risk of PCI-related vascular complications. J Interv Cardiol. 2208;21:273-278

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koreny M, Riedmuller E, et al. Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization. JAMA. 2004;291(3):350–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikram S. Kashyap M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vargas, L., Kashyap, V.S. (2013). Vascular Access Closure Devices. In: Kumar, A., Ouriel, K. (eds) Handbook of Endovascular Interventions. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5013-9_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5013-9_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5012-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5013-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics