Skip to main content

Electronic and Other Self-Help Materials for Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Primary Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Addressing Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Primary Care

Abstract

There are ample reasons to think broadly about facilitating a change in unhealthy alcohol use, given that the majority of persons meeting criteria for an alcohol-use disorder neither receive nor want treatment. At the same time, the majority of those who recover from an alcohol-use disorder do not do so via formal treatment, and brief interventions (one or two sessions, often as brief as 15 min in length) for alcohol use frequently show results that appear equivalent to those of longer interventions, sometimes even with heavier drinkers. Growing evidence suggests that even pretreatment assessment, and/or the decision to seek help and be involved in a research study, can result in significant change. Thus, alternative approaches could be important options for those whose unhealthy drinking is not severe enough to merit formal treatment, as well as with dependent drinkers who are currently unwilling to consider formal treatment. Self-help approaches broadly defined here as any nonpharmaceutical source of assistance not involving a live counselor or other professional may meet the need for an alternative approach that is efficacious, relatively palatable to patients exhibiting unhealthy alcohol use, and minimally burdensome to medical staff. The current review included only interventions that have been subjected to at least minimal empirical evaluation, defined as at least one controlled trial. Evidence supports the use of self-help interventions in helping to promote reductions in alcohol use among persons with unhealthy alcohol use. If implemented widely, they have the potential for a relatively strong public health and population impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Similarly, Ondersma et al. [41] have suggested that during-session data such as ratings of state motivation or satisfaction could serve as a proxy measure of likely outcome, allowing a large number of treatment characteristics to be evaluated with greater speed, and less expense, than in a traditional clinical trial.

References

  1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Rockville: Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-38 A, HHS Publication No. SMA 10-4586; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klingemann HK, Sobell LC. Introduction: natural recovery research across substance use. Subst. Use Misuse. 2001;36(11):1409–1416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bischof G, Rumpf HJ, Hapke U, Meyer C, John U. Types of natural recovery from alcohol dependence: a cluster analytic approach. Addiction. 2003;98(12):1737–1746.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burman S. The challenge of sobriety: natural recovery without treatment and self-help groups. J Subst Abuse. 1997;9:41–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moyer A, Finney JW, Swearingen CE, Vergun P. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations. Addiction. 2002;97(3):279–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burke BL, Arkowitz H, Menchola M. The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003;71(5):843–861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaner EF, Dickinson HO, Beyer F, et al. The effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care settings: a systematic review. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2009;28(3):301–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Field CA, Caetano R. The effectiveness of brief intervention among injured patients with alcohol dependence: who benefits from brief interventions? Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;111(1–2):13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Epstein EE, Drapkin ML, Yusko DA, Cook SM, McCrady BS, Jensen NK. Is alcohol assessment therapeutic? Pretreatment change in drinking among alcohol-dependent women. J Stud Alcohol. 2005;66(3):369–378.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kypri K, Langley JD, Saunders JB, Cashell-Smith ML. Assessment may conceal therapeutic benefit: findings from a randomized controlled trial for hazardous drinking. Addiction. 2007;102(1):62–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carey KB, Carey MP, Maisto SA, Henson JM. Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74(5):943–954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clifford PR, Maisto SA, Davis CM. Alcohol treatment research assessment exposure subject reactivity effects: Part I. Alcohol use and related consequences. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68(4):519–528.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McCambridge J, Day M. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of completing the alcohol use disorders identification test questionnaire on self-reported hazardous drinking. Addiction. 2008;103(2):241–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption–II. Addiction. 1993;88(6):791–804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cunningham JA, Humphreys K, Koski-Jannes A. Providing personalized assessment feedback for problem drinking on the Internet: a pilot project. J Stud Alcohol. 2000;61(6):794–798.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaner EF, Beyer F, Dickinson HO, et al. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2:CD004148.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Riper H, van Straten A, Keuken M, Smit F, Schippers G, Cuijpers P. Curbing problem drinking with personalized-feedback interventions: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2009;36(3):247–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Khadjesari Z, Murray E, Hewitt C, Hartley S, Godfrey C. Can stand-alone computer-based interventions reduce alcohol consumption? A systematic review. Addiction. 2011;106(2):267–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Riper H, Kramer J, Conijn B, Smit F, Schippers G, Cuijpers P. Translating effective web-based self-help for problem drinking into the real world. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009;33(8):1401–1408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(7):554–556.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carey KB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Elliott JC, Bolles JR, Carey MP. Computer-delivered interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2009;104(11):1807–1819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. White A, Kavanagh D, Stallman H, et al. Online alcohol interventions: a systematic review. J Med Int Res. 2010;12(5):e62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rooke S, Thorsteinsson E, Karpin A, Copeland J, Allsop D. Computer-delivered interventions for alcohol and tobacco use: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2010;105(8):1381–1390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Portnoy DB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Johnson BT, Carey MP. Computer-delivered interventions for health promotion and behavioral risk reduction: a meta-analysis of 75 randomized controlled trials, 1988–2007. Prev Med. 2008;47(1):3–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Doumas DM, Hannah E. Preventing high-risk drinking in youth in the workplace: a web-based normative feedback program. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008;34(3):263–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Helzer JE, Rose GL, Badger GJ, et al. Using interactive voice response to enhance brief alcohol intervention in primary care settings. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008;69(2):251–258.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Whittaker R, Borland R, Bullen C, Lin RB, McRobbie H, Rodgers A. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4:CD006611.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weitzel JA, Bernhardt JM, Usdan S, Mays D, Glanz K. Using wireless handheld computers and tailored text messaging to reduce negative consequences of drinking alcohol. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68(4):534–537.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Miller WR. Behavioral treatment of problem drinkers: a comparative outcome study of three controlled drinking therapies. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1978;46(1):74–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Apodaca TR, Miller WR. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of bibliotherapy for alcohol problems. J Clin Psychol. 2003;59(3):289–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Heather N, Kissoon-Singh J, Fenton GW. Assisted natural recovery from alcohol problems: effects of a self-help manual with and without supplementary telephone contact. Br J Addict. 1990;85(9):1177–1185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. A cross-national trial of brief interventions with heavy drinkers. WHO Brief Intervention Study Group. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(7):948–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Leo GI, Agrawal S, Johnson-Young L, Cunningham JA. Promoting self-change with alcohol abusers: a community-level mail intervention based on natural recovery studies. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002;26(6):936–948.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Blow FC, Barry KL, Walton MA, et al. The efficacy of two brief intervention strategies among injured, at-risk drinkers in the emergency department: impact of tailored messaging and brief advice. J Stud Alcohol. 2006;67(4):568–578.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(4):673–693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cunningham JA, Humphreys K, Koski-Jannes A, Cordingley J. Internet and paper self-help materials for problem drinking: is there an additive effect? Addict Behav. 2005;30(8):1517–1523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Beich A, Gannik D, Malterud K. Screening and brief intervention for excessive alcohol use: qualitative interview study of the experiences of general practitioners. Br Med J. 19 2002;325(7369):870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kypri K, Stephenson S, Langley J. Assessment of nonresponse bias in an internet survey of alcohol use. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004;28(4):630–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Miller WR, Munoz RF. Controlling your drinking: tools to make moderation work for you. New York: Guilford; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ondersma S, Grekin E, Svikis D. The potential for technology in brief interventions for substance use, and during-session prediction of computer delivered brief intervention response. Subst Use Misuse. 2011;46(1):77–86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven J. Ondersma PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ondersma, S.J., Tzilos, G.K. (2013). Electronic and Other Self-Help Materials for Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Primary Care. In: Saitz, R. (eds) Addressing Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Primary Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4779-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4779-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4778-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4779-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics