Skip to main content

Ethical Issues in Organ Donation from Brain-Dead Donors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Brain-Dead Organ Donor

Abstract

Organ donation and transplantation are value-laden enterprises. The relative scarcity of transplantable organs is commonly presumed to be the source of ethical dilemmas in transplantation. Accordingly, considerable emphasis has been placed on increasing the availability of organs for transplantation. The focus on supply and demand misses the fundamental human questions that necessarily shape our understanding of the donation and transplantation of organs, especially from deceased donors. The moral language of transplantation and the public policy framework for organ donation in the USA highlight some of the values underlying organ donation and transplantation practice and policies: gift, altruism, autonomy, and stewardship. Ultimately, donor organs are gifts unlike most other gifts, and they necessarily require an elaborate social context (including organ recovery and sharing infrastructure, as well as the expertise of transplant teams) to realize their value as gifts. The social context of transplantation points to the intersection of donor autonomy and the communal values informing transplant policies. This chapter examines ethical issues arising in the context of organ donation and transplantation generally, and specifically those associated with various proposals to increase the supply of transplantable organs, primarily through a critical analysis of the values shaping transplantation, as suggested by our moral language.

Note: This chapter builds on some of the themes originally presented in Fox MD. Directed donation: a critical examination of the values underlying organ donation and allocation policy. Thesis (Ph.D. in Religion)—Vanderbilt University; 1997.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Despite my contention that no harm can be done to the cadaveric donor, I recognize that the deceased is owed a measure of dignity and respect.

References

  1. Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. A definition of irreversible coma. JAMA. 1968;205:85–8, 337–40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mollaret P, Goulon M. The depassed coma (preliminary memoir). Rev Neurol (Paris). 1959;101:3–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Black P. Brain death. N Engl J Med. 1978;299:338–44, 393–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kouwenhoven WB, Jude JR, Knickerbocker GG. Closed-chest cardiac massage. JAMA. 1960;173: 1064–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolstenholme GEW, O’Connor M, editors. Ethics in medical progress: with special reference to transplantation. Proceedings of the Ciba Foundation Symposium; 1966. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beecher HK. Ethical problems created by the hopelessly unconscious patient. N Engl J Med. 1968; 278:1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nuland SB. Doctors: the biography of medicine. 2nd ed. New York: Vintage Books; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haag BW, Stuart FP. The organ donor: brain death, selection criteria, supply and demand. In: Flye MW, editor. Principles of organ transplantation. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1989. p. 176–93.

    Google Scholar 

  9. President’s Council on Bioethics. Controversies in the determination of death: a white paper of the President’s Council on Bioethics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boucek MM, Mashburn C, Dunn SM, Frizell R, Edwards L, Pietra B, et al. Pediatric heart transplantation after declaration of cardiocirculatory death. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(7):709–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fellner CH, Schwartz SH. Altruism in disrepute. N Engl J Med. 1971;284:582–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fox RC, Swazey JP. Spare parts: organ replacement in American society. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mauss M. The gift: forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. [I. Cunnison, trans]. New York: W. W. Norton & Company; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murray TH. Gifts of the body and the needs of strangers. Hastings Center Rep. 1987;17(2):30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Murray TH. Organ vendors, families, and the gift of life. In: Youngner SJ, Fox RC, O’Connell LJ, editors. Organ transplantation: meanings and realities. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Camenisch PF. Gift and gratitude in ethics. J Relig Ethics. 1981;9:2.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Martin DK, Meslin E. The give and take of organ procurement. J Med Philos. 1994;19(1):61–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Titmuss RM. The gift relationship: from human blood to social policy. New York: Vintage Books; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prottas JM. The most useful gift: altruism and the public policy of organ transplants. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dukeminier J, Sanders D. Organ transplantation: a proposal for routine salvaging of cadaver organs. N Engl J Med. 1968;279:413–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. The Gallup Organization, Inc. 2005 National Public Opinion Survey on Organ Donation. http://www.organdonor.gov/survey2005/index.shtm.

  22. Childress JF. The gift of life: ethical issues in organ transplantation. Bull Am Coll Surg. 1996;81(3):12.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nelson JL. The rights and responsibilities of potential organ donors: a communitarian approach. Washington, DC: The Communitarian Network; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Blumstein JF. The case for commerce in organ transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1992;24:2190–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peters TG. Life or death: the issue of payment in cadaveric organ donation. JAMA. 1991;265: 1302–05.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodrigue JR, Crist K, Roberts JP, Freeman Jr RB, Merion RM, Reed AI. Stimulus for organ donation: a survey of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons membership. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:2172–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Arnold R, Bartlett S, Bernat J, et al. Financial incentives for cadaver organ donation: an ethical reappraisal. Transplantation. 2002;73:1361–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gaylin W, Jennings B. The perversion of autonomy: the proper use of coercion and constraints in a liberal society. New York: The Free Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Veatch RM. A theory of medical ethics. New York: Basic Books; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Berlin I. Four essays on liberty. New York: Oxford University Press; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Caplan AL, Danovitch G, Shapiro M, Lavee J, Epstein M. Time for a boycott of Chinese science and medicine pertaining to organ transplantation. (Letter). Lancet. 2011;378:1218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tsai DF-C, Tsai M-K, Ko W-J. Organs by firing squad: the medical and moral implausibility of death penalty organ procurement. Am J Bioeth. 2011;11: 11–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Caplan A. The use of prisoners as sources of organs—an ethically dubious practice. Am J Bioeth. 2011;11:1–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kluge EHW. Designated organ donation: private choice in social context. Hastings Center Rep. 1989; 19:10–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Childress JF. The body as property: some philosophical reflections. Transplant Proc. 1992;24:2143–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Andrews LB. My body, my property. Hastings Center Rep. 1986;16(5):28–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mohrmann ME. Medicine as ministry: reflections on suffering, ethics, and hope. Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark D. Fox M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fox, M.D., Munoz, R.T. (2013). Ethical Issues in Organ Donation from Brain-Dead Donors. In: Novitzky, D., Cooper, D. (eds) The Brain-Dead Organ Donor. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4304-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4304-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4303-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4304-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics