Skip to main content

Abstract

Imaging is now a key component in the diagnosis and management of patients with pleural disease. The CXR remains the most important first imaging investigation, with ultrasound (US) now commonly performed by chest physicians as the next most frequent investigation, used to confirm the presence of a pleural effusion and to guide aspiration, drain insertion, and biopsy. Computed tomography (CT) is used to complement ultrasound and, in some cases, aid diagnosis, guide biopsy, and stage patients with pleural malignancy. More recently, positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT) has been shown to have a role in distinguishing benign from malignant disease and provide additional staging and prognostic information in patients with mesothelioma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Reading

  1. Rahman NM, Singanayagam A, Davies HE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy, safety and utilisation of respiratory physician-delivered thoracic ultrasound. Thorax. 2010;65:449–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MacDuff A, Arnold A, Harvey J. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65(Suppl 2):ii18–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang PC, Luh KT, Chang DB, Wu HD, Yu CJ, Kuo SH. Value of sonography in determining the nature of pleural effusion: analysis of 320 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159:29–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu RG, Yang PC, Kuo SH, Luh KT. “Fluid color” sign: a useful indicator for discrimination between pleural thickening and pleural effusion. J Ultrasound Med. 1995;14:767–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Qureshi NR, Rahman NM, Gleeson FV. Thoracic ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion. Thorax. 2008;64:139–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brutsche MH, Tassi GF, Gyorik S, et al. Treatment of sonographically stratified multiloculated thoracic empyema by medical thoracoscopy. Chest. 2005;128:3303–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davies HE, Davies RJO, Davies CWH. Management of pleural infection in adults: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65(Suppl 2):ii41–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Helm EJ, Matin TN, Gleeson FV. Imaging of the pleura. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;32(6):1275–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. American Thoracic Society. Diagnosis and initial management of nonmalignant diseases related to asbestos. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170:691–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Neragi-Miandoab S. Malignant pleural effusion, current and evolving approaches for its diagnosis and management. Lung Cancer. 2006;54:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leung AN, Muller NL, Miller RR. CT in differential diagnosis of diffuse pleural disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:487–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Plathow C, Klopp M, Thieke C, et al. Therapy response in malignant pleural mesothelioma-role of MRI using RECIST, modified RECIST and volumetric approaches in comparison with CT. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1635–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yildirim H, Metintas M, Entok E, et al. Clinical value of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in differentiation of malignant mesothelioma from asbestos-related benign pleural disease: an observational pilot study. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4:1480–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Armato 3rd SG, Entwisle J, Truong MT, et al. Current state and future directions of pleural mesothelioma imaging. Lung Cancer. 2008;59:411–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Salahudeen HM, Hoey ET, Robertson RJ, Darby MJ. CT appearances of pleural tumours. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:918–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaffe CC. Measures of response: RECIST, WHO, and new alternatives. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3245–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Erasmus JJ, Truong MT, Smythe WR, et al. Integrated computed tomography-positron emission tomography in patients with potentially resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma: staging implications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:1364–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamamuro M, Gerbaudo VH, Gill RR, Jacobson FL, Sugarbaker DJ, Hatabu H. Morphologic and functional imaging of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur J Radiol. 2007;64:356–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ceresoli GL, Chiti A, Zucali PA, et al. Early response evaluation in malignant pleural mesothelioma by positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4587–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Flores RM, Akhurst T, Gonen M, et al. Positron emission tomography predicts survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:763–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Francis RJ, Byrne MJ, van der Schaaf AA, et al. Early prediction of response to chemotherapy and survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma using a novel semiautomated 3-dimensional volume-based analysis of serial 18F-FDG PET scans. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1449–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chong S, Kim TS, Cho EY, Kim J, Kim H. Benign localized fibrous tumour of the pleura: CT features with histopathological correlations. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:875–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gaerte SC, Meyer CA, Winer-Muram HT, Tarver RD, Conces Jr DJ. Fat-containing lesions of the chest. Radiographics. 2002;22:S61–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maskell NA, Gleeson FV, Davies RJ. Standard pleural biopsy versus CT-guided cutting-needle biopsy for diagnosis of malignant disease in pleural effusions: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361:1326–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Benamore RE, Scott K, Richards CJ, et al. Image-guided pleural biopsy: diagnostic yield and complications. Clin Radiol. 2006; 61:700–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fergus Gleeson M.B.B.S., FRCR, FRCP .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gleeson, F. (2013). Pleural Imaging. In: Ernst, A., Herth, F. (eds) Principles and Practice of Interventional Pulmonology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4292-9_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4292-9_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4291-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4292-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics