Skip to main content

Resilience as Tolerance for Ambiguity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Family Resilience

Abstract

Marie’s husband went hiking four years ago and vanished without a trace. Marie has come to believe now, four years after his disappearance, that she will never know where her husband is, or whether he is dead or alive. Some days she thinks he is dead; other days she thinks he started a new life somewhere else. It goes like that, back and forth. She wonders when it will be over. Never? All she knows for sure is this: She is not waiting anymore for him to come back. She is finally moving forward with her life despite not knowing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 389.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Family Relations (April 2007), 56(2).

  2. 2.

    Bonanno defined resilience as “the ability of adults in otherwise normal circumstances who are exposed to an isolated and potentially highly disruptive event, such as the death of a close relation or a violent or life-threatening situation, to maintain relatively stable, healthy levels of psychological and physical functioning” (2004, p. 20). Bonanno (2004) confirms Walsh’s earlier (1998) premise that resilience is more than the absence of psychopathology. Even during times of adversity, it means continuous healthy functioning with regenerative growth and positive emotions (Bonanno et al. 2001).

  3. 3.

    The focus on pathology was perhaps influenced by Bowlby (1980), who saw positive emotion after loss as denial. Previous researchers found that 65% of self-identified grief therapists believed that the absence of grieving was pathological (Middleton, Moylan, Raphael, Burnett, & Martinek, 1993; Osterweis, Solomon, Green, & Institute of Medicine, Committee for the Study of Health Consequences of the Stress of Bereavement, 1984). The update is this: There is no basis for the assumption that the absence of grief is pathological or that its absence is always followed by delayed grief reactions. In fact, there is solid evidence that resilience to loss is enhanced by positive emotion (Bonanno, 2004; Bonnano & Keltner, 1997; Wortman & Silver, 1989). What these researchers found, however, is that those who did well after loss were ready to accept the death, believed in a just world (Boss, 2002), and had instrumental support. Although immediately after loss, there were some emotional pangs, intrusive thoughts, and ruminations, they did not, in resilient people, endure or interfere with daily functioning and affect (Bonanno, 2004; Bonanno, Wortman, & Nesse, 2004). What this tells us is that Bowlby was wrong. Some people—resilient people—experience loss and trauma without ­disabling negative emotions.

  4. 4.

    The capacity of rituals to express powerful contradictions simultaneously makes them especially relevant to the mourning process (Imber-Black, 2004).

  5. 5.

    For more on this topic, please see Chap. 26.

  6. 6.

    This was evident for families of the missing after 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, and the South Asian tsunami, and more recently in East Timor and Nepal as discovered by field workers for the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) (Bhawan & Baneshwor, 2009; International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), 2010; Robins, 2010).

  7. 7.

    This shift to a resilience focus continues today with a research emphasis on assets, compensatory factors, protective factors, and competence in developmental tasks (Wright & Masten, 2005). Contemporary psychologists have studied how people stay resilient across the life span with risk factors such as poverty, homelessness, divorce, physical illness, and mental illness (Cowan, 1991; Hauser, 1999; Hauser, DiPlacido, Jacobson, Willet, & Cole, 1993; Masten, 2001). For example, in Hauser’s (1999) longitudinal study of clinical and nonclinical adolescents (now mature adults), he found that attributing a positive meaning to the earlier experience of institutionalization accounted for the adult health and resilience.

  8. 8.

    Family Relations, April 2007, 56(2).

  9. 9.

    Although therapies that build resilience can be called “strength-based approaches,” they are not synonymous with solution-focused therapies.

References

  • Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress, and coping: New perspectives on mental and physical well-being. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky, A., & Sourani, T. (1988). Family sense of coherence and adaptation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50, 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becvar, D. S. (2001). In the presence of grief: Helping family members resolve death, dying, and bereavement issues. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhawan, M., & Baneshwor, N. (2009). Families of missing persons in Nepal: A study of their needs. Kathmandu, Nepal: International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A. (2009). The other side of sadness. New York, NY: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A., Field, N. P., Kovacevic, A., & Kaltman, S. (2002). Self-enhancement as a buffer against extreme adversity: Civil war in Bosnia and traumatic loss in the United States. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 184–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A., & Keltner, D. (1997). Facial expressions of emotion and the course of conjugal bereavement. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(1), 126–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A., Noll, J. G., Putnam, F. W., O’Neill, M., & Trickett, P. K. (2003). Predicting the willingness to disclose childhood sexual abuse from measures of repressive coping and dissociative tendencies. Child Maltreatment, 8, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A., Papa, A., & O’Neill, K. (2001). Loss and human resilience. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 10(3), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A., Wortman, C. B., & Nesse, R. M. (2004). Prospective patterns of resilience and maladjustment during widowhood. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 260–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (1972). Father absence in intact families. In Research and Theory Section. Presentation at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, Toronto, Canada, November 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (1975). Psychological father presence in the missing-in-action (MIA) family: Its effects on family functioning. Proceedings: Third annual joint medical meeting concerning POW/MIA matters, (pp. 61–65). San Diego, CA: Naval Health Research Center, Center for Prisoner of War Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (1977). A clarification of the concept of psychological father presence in families experiencing ambiguity of boundary. Journal of Marriage & Family, 39(1), 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (1980). The relationship of psychological father presence, wife’s personal qualities, and wife/family dysfunction in families of missing fathers. Journal of Marriage & Family, 42(3), 541–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (1986). Psychological absence in the intact family: A systems approach to the study of fathering. Marriage & Family Review, 10(1), 11–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (1987). Family stress. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 695–723). New York, NY: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (1999). Ambiguous loss: Learning to live with unresolved grief. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Original work published 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (2002). Family stress management: A contextual approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage (Original work published 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (Ed.) (with Mulligan, C.). (2003). Family stress: Classic and contemporary readings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (2004a). Ambiguous loss. In F. Walsh & M. McGoldrick (Eds.), Living beyond loss: Death in the family (2nd ed., pp. 237–246). New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (2004b). Ambiguous loss research, theory, and practice: Reflections after 9/11. Journal of Marriage & Family, 66(3), 551–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (2006). Loss, trauma, and resilience: Therapeutic work with ambiguous loss. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (2007). Ambiguous loss theory: Challenges for scholars and practitioners [Special issue]. Family Relations, 56(2), 105–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (2008). A tribute, not a memorial. SIGMOD Record, 37(2), 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (2011). Loving someone who has dementia. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P., Beaulieu, L., Wieling, E., Turner, W., & LaCruz, S. (2003). Healing loss, ambiguity, and trauma: A community-based intervention with families of union workers missing after the 9/11 attack in New York City. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29(4), 455–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P., Caron, W., Horbal, J., & Mortimer, J. (1990). Predictors of depression in caregivers of dementia patients: Boundary ambiguity and mastery. Family Process, 29(3), 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P., Roos, S., & Harris, D. L. (2011). Grief in the midst of uncertainty: An exploration of ambiguous loss and chronic sorrow. In R. A. Neimeyer, H. Winokuer, D. L. Harris, & G. Thornton (Eds.), Grief and bereavement in contemporary society (pp. 163–175). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Loss: Sadness and depression, Vol. III. Attachment and Loss series. New York, NY: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caron, W., Boss, P., & Mortimer, J. (1999). Family boundary ambiguity predicts Alzheimer’s outcomes. Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 62(4), 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. S., Olson, C. D., & Buckmiller, N. (2007). Family boundary ambiguity: A 30-year review of theory, research, and measurement. Family Relations, 56(2), 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, P. A. (1991). Individual and family life transitions: A proposal for a new definition. In P. A. Cowan & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Family transitions. Advances in family research series (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fravel, D. L., & Boss, P. G. (1992). An in-depth interview with the parents of missing children. In J. F. Gilgun & K. Daly (Eds.), Qualitative methods in family research (pp. 126–145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garmezy, N. (1985). Stress-resistant children: The search for protective factors. In J. E. Stevenson (Ed.), Recent research in developmental psychopathology (pp. 213–233). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garmezy, N. (1987). Stress, competence, and development: Continuities in the study of schizophrenic adults, children vulnerable to psychopathology, and the search for stress-resistant children. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57(2), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garmezy, N., & Masten, A. S. (1986). Stress, competence, and resilience: Common frontiers for therapist and psychopathologist. Behavior Therapy, 17, 500–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garmezy, N., & Rutter, M. (1985). Acute reactions to stress. In M. Rutter & L. Hersov (Eds.), Child psychiatry: Modern approaches (2nd ed., pp. 152–176). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, S. T. (1999). Understanding resilient outcomes: Adolescent lives across time and generations. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, S. T., DiPlacido, J., Jacobson, A. M., Willett, J., & Cole, C. (1993). Family coping with an adolescent’s chronic illness: An approach and three studies. Journal of Adolescence, 16(3), 305–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, D. R., & DeHaan, L. (1996). Toward a definition of family resilience: Integrating life-span and family perspectives. Family Process, 35(3), 283–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M., & Blechman, E. A. (1996). Stress, coping, and resiliency in children and families. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imber-Black, E. (2004). Rituals and the healing process. In F. Walsh & M. McGoldrick (Eds.), Living beyond loss: Death in the family (2nd ed., pp. 340–357). New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). (2010). Needs of families of the missing in Timor-Leste. Keybayoran Baru, Jakarta Selatan: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, J., & Saul, J. (2004). Facilitating family and community resilience in response to major disaster. In F. Walsh & M. McGoldrick (Eds.), Living beyond loss: Death in the family (2nd ed., pp. 285–309). New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, M. A., & McCubbin, H. I. (1993). Families coping with illness: The resiliency model of family stress, adjustment, and adaptation. In C. Danielson, B. Hamel Bissell, & P. Winstead-Fry (Eds.), Families, health, and illness (pp. 21–64). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, W., Moylan, A., Raphael, B., Burnett, P., & Martinek, N. (1993). An international perspective on bereavement related concepts. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 27(3), 457–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. (2011 January 20). Ruling delayed on Al Barnes’ medical decisions. Star Tribune, pp. B2, B5

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterweis, M., Solomon, F., Green, M., & Institute of Medicine, Committee for the Study of Health Consequences of the Stress of Bereavement. (1984). Bereavement: Reactions, consequences, and care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick-Ott, A., & Ladd, L. D. (2010). The blending of Boss’s concept of ambiguous loss and Olshanky’s concept of chronic sorrow: A case study of a family with a child who has significant disabilities. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 5(1), 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, S. (2010). Ambiguous loss in a non-Western context: Families of the disappeared in postconflict Nepal. Family Relations, 59(3), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saul, J. (2003). Promoting community recovery in lower Manhattan after September 11, 2001. Bulletin of the Royal Institute for Inter-Faith Studies, 5(2), 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991). Does “grief work” work? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(3), 479–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, F. (1998). Strengthening family resilience. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, S., & Wolin, S. (1993). The resilient self: How ­survivors of troubled families rise above adversity. New York, NY: Villard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortman, C. B., & Silver, R. C. (1989). The myths of coping with loss. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 349–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. O., & Masten, A. S. (2005). Resilience processes in development: Fostering positive adaptation in the context of adversity. In S. Goldstein & R. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (pp. 17–37). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pauline Boss .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boss, P. (2013). Resilience as Tolerance for Ambiguity. In: Becvar, D. (eds) Handbook of Family Resilience. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3917-2_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics