Skip to main content

Introduction

Rapidly accelerating societal and economic change is posing new, more complex challenges for management researchers seeking to improve organizations. Many organizations that prospered during more stable times – times that rewarded routinized efficiency – now find themselves poorly adapted to today’s new economic and social realities. In every direction, traditional structures are abruptly being reshaped or falling down. Once successful companies are finding that their sure-hit formulas no longer work. Long revered icons of organizational excellence have been humbled, and even bailed out of bankruptcy and imminent demise by government intervention. Individuals, families, and entire communities are finding the world shifting beneath their feet as traditional markets, industries, and sources of employment disappear under the impact of new information technologies, global competition, lack of regulation of financial institutions, uncertainty about global warming, transitioning...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,100.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ambrosini V. The resource-based view of the firm. In: Ambrosini V, editor. Tacit and ambiguous resources as sources of competitive advantage. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan; 2003. p. 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit R, Shoemaker P. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strateg Manag J. 1993;14:33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS. Managing creativity: A Japanese model. Acad Manag Exec. 1992;6(2):29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS. Impacts and outcomes of creativity in organizational settings. In: Isaksen SG, Murdock MC, Firestein RL, Treffinger DJ, editors. Nurturing and developing creativity: the emergence of a discipline. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1993. p. 278–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS. Managing the creative process in organizations. In: Runco MJ, editor. Problem finding, problem solving and creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1994a. p. 237–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS. Managing the creative process in organizations. In: Runco MJ, editor. Problem finding, problem solving and creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1994b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS. Leading others to think innovatively together: creative leadership. Leadersh Q. 2004;15:103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS, Basadur TM. Where are the generators? Psychology Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts. 2011;5(1):29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS, Gelade G. The role of knowledge management in the innovation process. Creativ Innov Manag. 2006;15(1):45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS, Finkbeiner CT. Measuring preference for ideation in creative problem solving training. J Appl Behav Sci. 1985;21(1):37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS, Gelade G. Using the creative problem solving profile (CPSP) for diagnosing and solving real-world problems. Emergence Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management. 2003;5(3):22–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS, Head MM. Team performance and satisfaction: a link to cognitive style within a process framework. J Creative Behav. 2001;35(3):227–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS, Robinson S. The new creative thinking skills needed for total quality management to become fact, not just philosophy. Am Behav Sci. 1993;37(1):121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS, Graen GB, Green SG. Training in creative problem solving: effects on ideation and problem finding in an applied research organization. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1982;30:41–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS, Graen GB, Scandura TA. Training effects on attitudes toward divergent thinking among manufacturing engineers. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71:612–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS, Graen GB, Wakabayashi M. Identifying individual differences in creative problem solving style. J Creative Behav. 1990;24(2):111–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur S, Pringle P, Speranzini G, Bacot M. Collaborative problem solving through creativity in problem definition: expanding the pie. Creativ Innov Manag. 2000a;9(1):54–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS, Runco MA, Vega L. Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes and behaviors work together: a causal process model. J Creative Behav. 2000b;34(2):77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS, Basadur TM. Creativity skills and problem solving style: impact on creativity social network position. Presented at Academy of Management Annual Conference, Chicago; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basadur MS, Basadur TM. How creativity relevant attitudes trigger behaviors, skills and performance. Presented at Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP) Annual Conference, Atlanta; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves RE. Competition in an open economy: a model applied to Canada Cambridge. Boston: Harvard University Press; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves RE, Porter M. From entry barriers to mobility barriers: conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competitors. Quart J Econ. 1977;91:241–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coch L, French J. Overcoming resistance to change. Hum Relat. 1948;1:512–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dertouzos ML, Lester RK, Solow RM. Made in America. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson AC. Three faces of Eden: the persistence of completing theories and multiple diagnoses in organizational intervention research. Hum Relat. 1996;49(5):571.

    Google Scholar 

  • French WL, Bell CH. Organization development: behavioral science interventions for organization improvement. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford JP. The nature of human intelligence. NYC: McGraw-Hill; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs JR. Practical management for productivity. Unpublished manuscript; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson GP, Healey MP. Cognition in organizations. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:387–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabanoff B, Rossiter JR. Recent developments in applied creativity. Int Rev Ind Organ Psychol. 1994;9:283–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr S. More on the folly-executive fax poll results. Acad Manag Exec. 1995;9(1):15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriegesmann B, Kley TM, Schwering MG. Creative errors and heroic failures: capturing their innovate potential. J Bus Strateg. 2005;26:57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke EA, Latham GP. Work motivation and satisfaction: light at the end of the tunnel. Psychol Sci. 1990;1(4):240–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H. The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper Collins; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirvis PH. Practice improvisation. Organ Sci. 1998;9(5):586–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mott PE. The characteristics of effective organizations. New York: Harper & Row; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ DW. Organizational citizenship behavior: the good soldier syndrome. Lexington: Lexington Books; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn AF. Applied imagination: principles and procedures of creative problem solving. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnes SJ, Noller RB, Biondi AM. Guide to creative action. New York: Scribner’s Sons; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porras JI, Robertson PJ. Organizational development: theory, practice, and research. In: Dunnette MD, Houg LM, editors. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 3. 2nd ed. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1992. p. 719–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M. Generic strategies and performance: an empirical examination with American data. New York: Sage; 1980a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M. Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press; 1980b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter-Palmon R, Robinson EJ. Problem identification and construction: what do we know, what is the future? Psychol Aesthet Creativ Arts. 2009;3(1):43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PJ, Roberts DR, Porras JI. Dynamics of planned organizational change: assessing empirical support for a theoretical model. Acad Manag J. 1993;36(3):619–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt RP. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In: Lamb RB, editor. Competitive strategic management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1984. p. 566–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco MA. Creativity. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:657–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P, Kleiner A, Roberts C, Ross R, Smith B. The fifth discipline fieldbook. New York: Doubleday; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector B, Beer M. Beyond TQM programmes. J Organ Change Manag. 1994;7(2):63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor FW. The principles of scientific management. New York: W.W. Norton & Company; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallas G. The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace; 1926.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Basadur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Basadur, M., Basadur, T., Licina, G. (2013). Simplexity Thinking. In: Carayannis, E.G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_427

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_427

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3857-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3858-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics