Skip to main content

Proximal Humerus Fracture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Orthopedic Traumatology

Abstract

AP is a 67-year-old female who presents to the emergency department via EMS complaining of severe shoulder pain after a high-speed motor-vehicle accident in which she was a restrained passenger. She denies any loss of consciousness. On primary survey, she demonstrates a GCS of 15, a patent airway, and is hemodynamically stable. On secondary survey, she demonstrates severe pain with passive range of motion of the right shoulder. There is no motor or sensory deficit and skin is intact. The remaining physical exam as well as her past medical history is unremarkable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kelsey JL, et al. Risk factors for fractures of the distal forearm and proximal humerus. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135(5):477–89.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Visser CP, et al. Nerve lesions in proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10(5):421–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Neer 2nd CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(6):1077–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Handoll HH, Ollivere BJ. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(12): CD000434.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koval KJ, et al. Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(2):203–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Keser S, et al. Proximal humeral fractures with minimal displacement treated conservatively. Int Orthop. 2004;28(4):231–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tejwani NC, et al. Functional outcome following one-part proximal humeral fractures: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(2):216–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The translated two-part fracture of the proximal humerus. Epidemiology and outcome in the older patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(6):799–804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jakob RP, et al. Four-part valgus impacted fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(2):295–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Court-Brown CM, Cattermole H, McQueen MM. Impacted valgus fractures (B1.1) of the proximal humerus. The results of non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(4):504–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Foruria AM, et al. The pattern of the fracture and displacement of the fragments predict the outcome in proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(3):378–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanson B, et al. Functional outcomes after nonoperative management of fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(4):612–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kristiansen B, Kofoed H. Transcutaneous reduction and external fixation of displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. A controlled clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70(5):821–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zyto K, et al. Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(3):412–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chatrchyan S, et al. Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at radical7 TeV in events with two photons and missing transverse energy. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;106(21):211802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Olerud P, et al. Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hodgson SA, et al. Rehabilitation of two-part fractures of the neck of the humerus (two-year follow-up). J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(2):143–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Olerud P, et al. Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(5):747–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Resch H, et al. Percutaneous fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(2):295–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bogner R, et al. Minimally-invasive treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(12):1602–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Calvo E, et al. Percutaneous fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures: indications based on the correlation between clinical and radiographic results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(6):774–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Keener JD, et al. Outcomes after percutaneous reduction and fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(3):330–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brunner A, et al. Closed reduction and minimally invasive percutaneous fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the Humerusblock. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(7):407–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Herscovici Jr D, et al. Percutaneous fixation of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;375:97–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hertel R. Fractures of the proximal humerus in osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16 Suppl 2:S65–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Park MC, et al. Two-part and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus treated with suture fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(5):319–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dimakopoulos P, Panagopoulos A, Kasimatis G. Transosseous suture fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(8):1700–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Robinson CM, Page RS. Severely impacted valgus proximal humeral fractures. Results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(9):1647–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wanner GA, et al. Internal fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures with two one-third tubular plates. J Trauma. 2003;54(3):536–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Egol KA, et al. Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(8):488–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bjorkenheim JM, Pajarinen J, Savolainen V. Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a locking compression plate: a retrospective evaluation of 72 patients followed for a minimum of 1 year. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75(6):741–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brunner F, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(3):163–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sudkamp N, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(6):1320–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sproul RC, et al. A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury. 2011;42(4):408–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gardner MJ, et al. The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(3):185–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chatrchyan S, et al. Measurement of the t-Channel Single Top Quark Production Cross Section in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]  =  7 TeV. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;107(9):091802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Solberg BD, et al. Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(7):1689–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Solberg BD, et al. Locked plating of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients: the effect of initial fracture pattern on outcome. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(2):113–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee CW, Shin SJ. Prognostic factors for unstable proximal humeral fractures treated with locking-plate fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(1):83–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gradl G, et al. Is locking nailing of humeral head fractures superior to locking plate fixation? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(11):2986–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhu Y, et al. Locking intramedullary nails and locking plates in the treatment of two-part proximal humeral surgical neck fractures: a prospective randomized trial with a minimum of three years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(2):159–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bastian JD, Hertel R. Osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty of fractures of the proximal humerus: outcomes in a consecutive case series. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(2):216–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Olerud P, et al. Quality of life and functional outcome after a 2-part proximal humeral fracture: a prospective cohort study on 50 patients treated with a locking plate. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;19(6):814–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bell JE, et al. Trends and variation in incidence, surgical treatment, and repeat surgery of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(2):121–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. van den Broek CM, et al. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: intramedullary nailing versus conservative treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(6):459–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rajasekhar C, Ray PS, Bhamra MS. Fixation of proximal humeral fractures with the Polarus nail. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10(1):7–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Sosef N, et al. Minimal invasive fixation of proximal humeral fractures with an intramedullary nail: good results in elderly patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(5):605–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Popescu D, et al. Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the T2-proximal humeral nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129(9):1239–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kazakos K, et al. Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the Polarus intramedullary nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(7):503–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Adedapo AO, Ikpeme JO. The results of internal fixation of three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures with the Polarus nail. Injury. 2001;32(2):115–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Sosef N, et al. The Polarus intramedullary nail for proximal humeral fractures: outcome in 28 patients followed for 1 year. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(3):436–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mittlmeier TW, et al. Stabilization of proximal humeral fractures with an angular and sliding stable antegrade locking nail (Targon PH). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A Suppl 4:136–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Linhart W, et al. Antegrade nailing of humeral head fractures with captured interlocking screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(5):285–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Nolan BM, et al. Surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures with a short intramedullary nail. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gerber C, Hersche O, Berberat C. The clinical relevance of posttraumatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7(6):586–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Boileau P, et al. Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(5):401–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Moeckel BH, et al. Modular hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(6):884–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Demirhan M, et al. Prognostic factors in prosthetic replacement for acute proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(3):181–8. discussion 188–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Mighell MA, et al. Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(6):569–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Robinson CM, et al. Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(7):1215–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kontakis GM, et al. Early management of complex proximal humeral fractures using the Aequalis fracture prosthesis: a two- to five-year follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(10):1335–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Antuna SA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a minimum five-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(2):202–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kontakis G, et al. Early management of proximal humeral fractures with hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(11):1407–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Bufquin T, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(4):516–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Cazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ. The reverse shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(4):535–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Gallinet D, et al. Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95(1):48–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Young SW, et al. Comparison of functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty in the primary treatment of acute proximal humerus fracture. ANZ J Surg. 2010;80(11):789–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William T. Obremskey M.D., M.P.H. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stinner, D.J., Streubel, P.N., Obremskey, W.T. (2013). Proximal Humerus Fracture. In: Sethi, M., Jahangir, A., Obremskey, W. (eds) Orthopedic Traumatology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3511-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3511-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3510-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3511-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics