Skip to main content

Programming Plush Toys as an Introduction to Computer Science: The (Fraught) Question of Motivation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ubiquitous and Mobile Learning in the Digital Age
  • 1741 Accesses

Abstract

Computer science education has long grappled with a central difficulty: despite the fact that the discipline is of undeniable cultural importance, and despite the fact that in America (as indeed in most countries) there is a perceived need for trained computer scientists, it is difficult to motivate younger students to pursue computing as a personal interest. This problem is particularly acute for female students, whose numbers among computer science undergraduate programs are consistently small. In this chapter, we discuss a project whose goal is to provide a more motivating introduction to middle-school students (particularly, though not exclusively, girls), employing tangible programming of plush toys as its central activity. Forty-six students, aged 12–14, completed a 7.5-week study in which they used a system called Plushbot to create and program their own plush toys; the students also completed pre- and post-surveys designed to elicit their attitudes toward programming and computer science. This chapter discusses the ideas behind using tangible programming as a motivating activity for computer science; the results of the surveys, while in many ways not encouraging for our purposes, highlight the difficulty both of measuring (and understanding) students’ attitudes toward programming and the continuing need for innovative research and design in responding to this issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Buechley, L., & Eisenberg, M. (2008). The LilyPad Arduino: Toward wearable engineering for everyone. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(2), 12–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsha, P. (2010). CRA Taulbee Report: CS enrollments, new majors, up for second straight year. At Computing Research Policy Blog. http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/2010/03/cra-taulbee-report-cs-enrollments-new-majors-up-for-2nd-straight-year/.

  • Huang, Y., & Eisenberg, M. (2011a). Steps toward child-designed interactive stuffed toys. In Proceedings of interaction design and children (IDC 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., & Eisenberg, M. (2011b). Plushbot: An application for the design of programmable stuffed toys. In Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction (TEI 2011), pp. 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazowska, E. (2010). Where the jobs are. The Computing Community Consortium Blog. http://www.cccblog.org/2010/01/04/where-the-jobs-are/.

  • Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., & Eastmond, E. (2010). The Scratch programming language and environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 10(4), article 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, P., & Nicholson, S. (2011). Physics undergraduate degrees. American Institute of Physics website. http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/physund08.pdf.

  • Repenning, A., Ahmadi, N., Repenning, N., Ioannidou, A., Webb, D., & Marshall, K. (2011). Collective programming: Making end-user programming (more) social. In Third international symposium on end-user development (IS-EUD 2011), Torre Canne, pp. 325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M., et al. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, J., & Rosenbaum, E. (2010). Gifts for intertwining with modern nature. In Proceedings of interaction design and children (IDC 2010), Barcelona, pp. 340–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyeth, P. (2008). Understanding engagement with tangible user interfaces. In Proceedings of OZCHI’08, pp. 331–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, L., Antle, A., & Motamedi, N. (2008). Are tangibles more fun?: Comparing children’s enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical, and tangible user interfaces. In Proceedings of tangible and embedded interaction (TEI 08) (pp. 191–198). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweben, S. (2010). Computing degree and enrollment trends, from the 2008-9 CRA Taulbee Survey. http://www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/CRATaulbee-2010-ComputingDegreeandEnrollmentTrends.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Leah Buechley and Ed Baafi for their invaluable contributions to this work and for valuable conversations; thanks also to our (anonymous) reviewers for their helpful suggestions. This project was partially supported by the National Science Foundation under grant CNS0940484.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingdan Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huang, Y., Meyers, J., DuBow, W., Wu, Z., Eisenberg, M. (2013). Programming Plush Toys as an Introduction to Computer Science: The (Fraught) Question of Motivation. In: Sampson, D., Isaias, P., Ifenthaler, D., Spector, J. (eds) Ubiquitous and Mobile Learning in the Digital Age. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3329-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics