Abstract
Traditional growth-based methods for characterizing environmental fungi are biased by selection of culture media and incapable of detecting non-cultivable fungi, which still retain allergenicity and/or pathogenicity. Meanwhile, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based methods have been recently developed and used to characterize fungal concentrations in environmental samples such as air and house dust. As qPCR-based methods are independent of fungal cultivability or viability, they are expected to be toxicologically more relevant than conventional growth-based methods for assessing health effects caused by environmental fungi. This chapter presents protocols for the collection of environmental fungal samples and subsequent qPCR analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Takahashi T (1997) Airborne fungal colony-forming units in outdoor and indoor environments in Yokohama, Japan. Mycopathologia 139:23–33
Shelton BG, Kirkland KH, Flanders WD, Morris GK (2002) Profiles of airborne fungi in buildings and outdoor environments in the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1743–1753
Meklin T, Haugland RA, Reponen T, Varma M, Lummus Z, Bernstein D et al (2004) Quantitative PCR analysis of house dust can reveal abnormal mold conditions. J Environ Monitor 6:615–620
Lignell U, Meklin T, Rintala H, Hyvarinen A, Vepsalainen A, Pekkanen J et al (2008) Evaluation of quantitative PCR and culture methods for detection of house dust fungi and streptomycetes in relation to moisture damage of the house. Lett Appl Microbiol 47:303–308
Hirvonen MR, Ruotsalainen M, Savolainen K, Nevalainen A (1997) Effect of viability of actinomycete spores on their ability to stimulate production of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in RAW264.7 macrophages. Toxicology 124:105–114
Yamamoto N, Kimura M, Matsuki H, Yanagisawa Y (2010) Optimization of a real-time PCR assay to quantitate airborne fungi collected on a gelatin filter. J Biosci Bioeng 109:83–88
Goebes MD, Boehm AB, Hildemann LM (2011) Contributions of foot traffic and outdoor concentrations to indoor airborne Aspergillus. Aerosol Sci Technol 45:352–363
Kaarakainen P, Meklin T, Rintala H, Hyvaerinen A, Karkkainen P, Vepsalainen A et al (2008) Seasonal variation in airborne microbial concentrations and diversity at landfill, urban and rural sites. Clean Soil Air Water 36:556–563
Yamamoto N, Schmechel D, Chen BT, Lindsley WG, Peccia J (2011) Comparison of quantitative airborne fungi measurements by active and passive sampling methods. J Aerosol Sci 42:499–507
Pitkaranta M, Meklin T, Hyvarinen A, Paulin L, Auvinen P, Nevalainen A et al (2008) Analysis of fungal flora in indoor dust by ribosomal DNA sequence analysis, quantitative PCR, and culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:233–244
Cai GH, Broms K, Malarstig B, Zhao ZH, Kim JL, Svardsudd K et al (2009) Quantitative PCR analysis of fungal DNA in Swedish day care centers and Âcomparison with building characteristics and allergen levels. Indoor Air 19:392–400
Yamamoto N, Shendell DG, Peccia J (2011) Assessing allergenic fungi in house dust by floor wipe sampling and quantitative PCR. Indoor Air 21:521–530
Bustin SA, Beaulieu JF, Huggett J, Jaggi R, Kibenge FSB, Olsvik PA et al (2010) MIQE precis: Practical implementation of minimum standard guidelines for fluorescence-based quantitative real-time PCR experiments. BMC Mol Biol 11:74
Hospodsky D, Yamamoto N, Peccia J (2010) Accuracy, precision, and detection limits of quantitative PCR for airborne bacteria and fungi measurement. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:7004–7012
Yamamoto N, Qian J, Hospodsky D, Peccia J (2010) Particle size distribution and seasonal concentrations of selected airborne fungi in the northeastern United States. In: The American Association for aerosol research. 29th Annual conference, Portland, Oregon
Borneman J, Hartin RJ (2000) PCR primers that amplify fungal rRNA genes from environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4356–4360
Herrera ML, Vallor AC, Gelfond JA, Patterson TF, Wickes BL (2009) Strain-dependent variation in 18S ribosomal DNA copy numbers in aspergillus fumigatus. J Clin Microbiol 47:1325–1332
Haugland R, Vesper S (2002) Method of identifying and quantifying specific fungi and bacteria. US Patent 6,387,652
Wilson IG (1997) Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:3741–3751
Kontanis EJ, Reed FA (2006) Evaluation of real-time PCR amplification efficiencies to detect PCR inhibitors. J Forensic Sci 51:795–804
Yuill E (1950) The numbers of nuclei in conidia of Aspergilli. Trans Br Mycol Soc 33:324–331
Campbell TH, Backus MP, Stauffer JF (1956) Cytological studies on Penicillium chrysogenum Thom. Bull Torrey Bot Club 83:93–106
Dolezel J, Bartos J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J (2003) Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry 51A:127–128
Acknowledgment
I thank Karen Dannemiller at Yale University for invaluable comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yamamoto, N. (2013). Real-Time PCR Assay in Fungi. In: Gupta, V., Tuohy, M., Ayyachamy, M., Turner, K., O’Donovan, A. (eds) Laboratory Protocols in Fungal Biology. Fungal Biology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2356-0_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2356-0_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-2355-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-2356-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)