Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Starkey Experimental Forest and Range: Long-Term Research to Meet the Needs of Managers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
USDA Forest Service Experimental Forests and Ranges

  • 829 Accesses

Abstract

As the current concern over climate change illustrates, there is a need, sometimes unforeseen, for the development and maintenance of long-term data sets. Coupling long-term vegetation data sets with long-term wildlife demographics allows scientists to evaluate potential cause–effect relations between changing landscapes and wildlife populations. Vegetation data sets contain important variables often included in habitat effectiveness models that predict the value of a landscape for a particular wildlife species. In this chapter, we focus on Starkey’s research history and long-term research activities on wildlife and rangeland resources as case examples of applied research that has addressed societal needs for ecosystem services. In 1939, Pickford wrote a letter that initiated discussions on the Starkey Cattle and Horse Allotment in the Whitman National Forest as suitable for a research station to develop information on the management of cattle summer range within the ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex. Loud) type. In 1940, the Starkey Experimental Forest became a reality. The major research problem to be addressed was the overgrazing of mountain ranges. The current research trajectory was initiated in 1989 with the building of a game-proof fence and development of a telemetry system to monitor ungulate movements. The initial studies focused on perceived conflicts between deer and elk, and timber harvest and livestock grazing. Current research focuses on the role of ungulates as chronic ecosystem disturbance agents and their interaction with episodic disturbance to alter successional trajectories. Also included is the confounding role of human disturbance in modifying ungulate distribution across landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ager AA, Johnson BK, Coe PK, Wisdom MJ (2005) Landscape simulation of foraging by elk, mule deer, and cattle on summer range. Pages 170–184 in Wisdom MJ, technical editor, The Starkey Project: a synthesis of long-term studies of elk and mule deer. Reprinted from the 2004 Transactions of the North American Wildlife and natural Resources Conference, Alliance Communications Group, Lawrence, Kansas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Angel DL, McClaran MP (2001) Long-term influences of livestock management and a non-native grass on grass dynamics on the desert grassland. J Arid Environ 49:507–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony RG, Forsman ED, Franklin AB et al (2006) Status and trends in the demography of northern spotted owls, 1982–2003. Wildl Mongr 163:48 (The Wildlife Society)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull EL (1987) Ecology of the pileated woodpecker in Northeastern Oregon. J Wildl Manage 51:472–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull EL, Holthausen RS (1993) Habitat use and management of pileated woodpeckers in Northeastern Oregon. J Wildl Manage 57:335–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull EL, Nielsen-Pincus N, Wales BC, Hayes JL (2007) The influence of disturbance events on pileated woodpeckers in Northeastern Oregon. For Ecol Manage 243:320–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buffington LC, Herbel CH (1965) Vegetational changes on a semidesert grassland range. Ecol Monogr 35:139–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cody ML, Smallwood JA (eds) (1996) Long-term studies of vertebrate communities. Academic Press, San Diego, 597 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe PK, Johnson BK, Kern JW, Findholt SL, Kie JG, and MJW (2001) Responses of elk and mule deer to cattle in summer. J Range Manage 54:A51–A76

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe PK, Johnson BK, Stewart KM, Kie JG (2005) Spatial and temporal interactions of elk, mule deer, and cattle. Pages 150–158 in Wisdom MJ, technical editor, The Starkey Project: a synthesis of long-term studies of elk and mule deer. Reprinted from the 2004 Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Alliance Communications Group, Lawrence, Kansas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook JG, Irwin LL, Bryant LD, Riggs RA, Thomas JW (1998) Relations of forest cover and condition of elk: a test of the thermal cover hypothesis in summer and winter. Wildl Monogr 141:61

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook JG, Irwin LL, Bryant LD, Riggs RA, Thomas JW (2005) Thermal cover needs of large ungulates: a review of hypothesis tests. Pages 185–196 in Wisdom MJ, technical editor, The Starkey Project: a synthesis of long-term studies of elk and mule deer. Reprinted from the 2004 Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Alliance Communications Group, Lawrence, Kansas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Findholt SL, Johnson BK, Damiran D, DelCurto T, Kie JG (2005) Diet composition, dry matter intake, and diet overlap of mule deer, elk, and cattle. Pages 159–169 in Wisdom MJ, technical editor, The Starkey Project: a synthesis of long-term studies of elk and mule deer. Reprinted from the 2004 Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Alliance Communications Group, Lawrence, Kansas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fribourg H (2005) Where are the land-grant colleges headed. J Nat Resour Life Sci Educ 34:40–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons RP, Beck RF (1988) Changes in grass basal area and forb densities over a 64-year period on grassland types of the Jornada Experimental Range. J Range Manag 41:186–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hann WJ, Jones JL, Karl MG et al (1997) Landscape dynamics of the basin. In: Quigley TM, Arbelbide SJ (eds) An assessment of ecosystem components in the interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-405. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Sta. Portland, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • Holechek JL, Vavra M, Skovlin J, Krueger WC (1982a) Cattle diets in the Blue Mountains of Oregon I: grasslands. J Range Manage 35(1):109–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holechek JL, Vavra M, Skovlin J, Krueger WC (1982b) Cattle diets in the Blue Mountains of Oregon II: forests. J Range Manage 35(2):239–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holechek JL, Berry TJ, Vavra M (1987) Grazing system influences on cattle performance on mountain range. J Range Manage 40(1):55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CG Jr (2003) Green fescue rangelands: changes over time in the Wallowa Mountains. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-569. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 41 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BK, Kern JW, Wisdom MJ, Findholt SL, Kie JG (2000) Resource selection and spatial separation of mule deer and elk during spring. J Wildl Manage 64:685–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klade RJ (2006) Building a research legacy: the intermountain station, 1911–1997. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-184 USDA Forest Service, 259 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Klipple GE, Costello DF (1960) Vegetation and cattle responses to different intensities of grazing on short-grass ranges on the central Great Plains. USDA Technical Bulletin 1216. USDA Washington, DC, 82 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Linkhart BD, Reynolds RT (2004) Longevity of flammulated owls: additional records and comparisons to other North American strigiforms. J Field Ornithol 75(192):195

    Google Scholar 

  • Linkhart BD, Reynolds RT (2007) Return rate, fidelity, and dispersal in a breeding population of flammulated owls (Otus flammeolus). Auk 124:264–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long RA, Rachlow JL, Kie JG (2008a) Effects of season and scale on response of elk and mule deer to habitat manipulation. J Wildl Manage 72:1133–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long RA, Rachlow JL, Kie JG, Vavra M (2008b) Fuels reduction in a western coniferous forest: effects on quantity and quality of forage for elk. Rangel Ecol Manage 61:302–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugo AE, Swanson FJ, Gonzalez OM, Adams MB, and others (2006) Long-term research at the USDA Forest Service’s experimental forest and ranges. Bioscience 56:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin SC, Cable DR (1974) Managing semidesert grass-shrub ranges Vegetation responses to precipitation, grazing, soil texture, and mesquite control. USDA Technical Bulletin 1480. USDA Washington, DC, 45 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueggler WF (1992) Cliff Lake bench research natural area: problems encountered in monitoring vegetation change on grasslands. Research Paper INT-454. Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, 13 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor LM, Wisdom MJ, Anthony RG (2009) Behavioral responses of North American elk to recreational activity. J Wildl Manage 73:328–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noyes JH, Johnson BK, Bryant LD, Findholt LL, Thomas JW (1996) Effects of bull age on conception dates and pregnancy rates of cow elk. J Wildl Manage 60:508–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noyes JH, Johnson BK, Dick BL, Kie JG (2002) Effects of male age and female nutritional condition on elk reproduction. J Wildl Manage 66:1301–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noyes JH, Johnson BK, Dick BL, Kie JG (2005) Influence of age of males and nutritional condition on short- and long-term reproductive success of elk. Pages 94–101 in Wisdom MJ, technical editor, The Starkey Project: a synthesis of long-term studies of elk and mule deer. Reprinted from the 2004 Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Alliance Communications Group, Lawrence, Kansas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson HA, Clary WP, Moore MM, Sieg CH (2008) Range management research, Fort Valley experimental forest. In: Olberding, SD, Moore MM (tech coords). Fort Valley experimental forest—a century of research 1908–2008. Proceedings RMRS-P-53CD. Fort Collins, CO: USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 408 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickford GD, Reid EH (1942) Competition of elk and domestic livestock for summer range forage. J Wildl Manage 7:328–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powledge F (2008) Climate change and public lands. Bioscience 58:912–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs RA, Tiedemann AR, Cook JG, Ballard TM et al (2000) Modification of mixed-conifer forests by ruminant herbivores in the Blue Mountains ecological province. Research Paper PNW-RP-527 USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, 77 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland MM, Bryant LD, Johnson BK et al (1997) The Starkey Project: history, facilities, and data collections methods for ungulate research. PNW-GTR-396 USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, 62 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland MM, Coe PC, Stussy RJ et al (1998) The Starkey habitat data base for ungulate research: construction, documentation, and use. PNW-GTR-430 USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, 48 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland MM, Wisdom MJ, Johnson BK, Kie JG (2000) Elk distribution and modeling in relation to roads. J Wildl Manage 64:672–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland MM, Wisdom MJ, Johnson BK, Penninger MA (2005) Effects of roads on elk: Implications for management in forested ecosystems. Pages 42–52 in Wisdom MJ, technical editor, The Starkey Project: a synthesis of long-term studies of elk and mule deer. Reprinted from the 2004 Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Alliance Communications Group, Lawrence, Kansas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp LA, Sanders K, Rimbey N (1990) Forty years of change in a shadscale stand in Idaho. Rangelands 12:313–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovlin JM (1991) Fifty years of research progress: a historical document on the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-266. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 58 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovlin JM, Harris RW, Strickler GS, Garrison GA (1976) Effects of cattle grazing methods on ponderosa pine-bunchgrass range in the Pacific Northwest. USDA Forest Service Technical Bulletin 1531. USDA Washington, DC, 40 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Swetnam TW, Allen CD, Betancourt J (1999) Applied historical ecology: using the past to manage the future. Ecol Appl 9:1189–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JW, Wisdom MJ (2005) Has the Starkey Project delivered on its commitments? Pages 240–248 in Wisdom MJ, technical editor, The Starkey Project: a synthesis of long-term studies of elk and mule deer. Reprinted from the 2004 Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Alliance Communications Group, Lawrence, Kansas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavra M (2005) Random musings on land grant universities: their relevance and future. Proc West Sect Am Soc Anim Sci 56:3–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavra M, Wisdom MJ, Kie JG, Cook JG, Riggs RA (2005) The role of ungulate herbivory and management on ecosystem patterns and processes: future direction of the Starkey Project. Pages 233–239 in Wisdom MJ, technical editor, The Starkey Project: a synthesis of long-term studies of elk and mule deer. Reprinted from the 2004 Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Alliance Communications Group, Lawrence, Kansas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Walburger K (2002) Twenty-five years of grazing research at Meadow Creek in the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range. M.S. Thesis Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 130 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom MJ, Ager AA, Preisler HK, Cimon NJ, Johnson BK (2005a) Effects of off-road recreation on mule deer and elk. Pages 67–80 in Wisdom MJ, technical editor, The Starkey Project: a synthesis of long-term studies of elk and mule deer. Reprinted from the 2004 Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Alliance Communications Group, Lawrence, Kansas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom MJ, Cimon NJ, Johnson BK, Garton EO, Thomas JW (2005b) Spatial partitioning by mule deer and elk in relation to traffic. Pages 53–66 in Wisdom MJ, technical editor, The Starkey Project: a synthesis of long-term studies of elk and mule deer. Reprinted from the 2004 Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Alliance Communications Group, Lawrence, Kansas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom MJ, Johnson BK, Vavra M et al (2005c) Cattle and elk response to intensive timber harvest. Pages 197–216 in Wisdom MJ, technical editor, The Starkey Project: a synthesis of long-term studies of elk and mule deer. Reprinted from the 2004 Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Alliance Communications Group, Lawrence, Kansas, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Yasmeen Sands, writer and technology transfer specialist, Pacific Northwest Research Station, for assistance in the development of portions of the narrative. The authors would also like to thank anonymous reviewers for their constructive input.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 1401 Gekeler Lane, 97850, La Grande, OR, USA

    Marty Vavra & Michael J. Wisdom

Authors
  1. Marty Vavra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael J. Wisdom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marty Vavra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. USDA Forest Service, Washington, District of Columbia, USA

    Deborah C. Hayes

  2. Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Irvine, Pennsylvania, USA

    Susan L. Stout

  3. Northeastern Areas, USDA Forest Service, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA

    Ralph H. Crawford

  4. USDA Forest Service, Washington, District of Columbia, USA

    Anne P. Hoover

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vavra, M., Wisdom, M. (2014). The Starkey Experimental Forest and Range: Long-Term Research to Meet the Needs of Managers. In: Hayes, D., Stout, S., Crawford, R., Hoover, A. (eds) USDA Forest Service Experimental Forests and Ranges. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1818-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation