Skip to main content

Activities, Symptoms, and Expectations of Patients Undergoing Hip Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hip Joint Restoration

Abstract

Does hip surgery restore normal hip function? While it is generally accepted that surgery is performed to avoid, or overcome, pain and deterioration of function, the underlying pathologies of hip deformity and dysfunction differ. Three common surgical procedures—hip osteotomy, hip arthroscopy, and total hip replacement—treat hip pathologies at three very different stages of life.

Surgical techniques and literature evaluating the relationship between hip dysplasia and secondary osteoarthritis have advanced hip osteotomy tremendously over the past 50 years. The few studies that have undertaken the challenge of quantifying the activity levels of individuals with symptomatic hip dysplasia sought to analyze changes in gait and overall activity level in patients with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). While studies demonstrate overall postoperative improvement, early diagnosis of hip dysplasia is particularly effective in improving clinical outcomes.

Patients undergo hip arthroscopy for a variety of reasons; however, it is important to identify the primary goals of each patient before undertaking an arthroscopic procedure and the likelihood that it can be achieved. The primary complaint of patients with intra-articular hip pathology is pain and pain-induced limitations to function, describing a feeling of “giving way” in the joint. Research in pain measurement scales, such as Visual Analog Scale (VAS), has found substantial improvements in pain, postoperatively; however, fulfillment of a patient’s preoperative expectations is often found to be overly optimistic.

Total Hip Replacement (THR) is currently the only solution for end-stage hip osteoarthritis (OA), though the physical activity level of patients seeking this treatment varies widely both before and after surgery. Despite the variance in a patient’s leisure and social activities, age has the greatest impact on the extent to which patients participate in physical activities. In view of the emerging status of all three approaches to the treatment of hip pathology, and the differences in their outcomes, we recommend that clinicians provide preoperative counsel to every individual patient regarding the likely outcome of treatment options, especially in terms of expected function with respect to each patient’s lifestyle and aspirations and the extent to which preoperative symptoms will be eliminated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Harris WH. Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;213:20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leunig M, Siebenrock KA, Ganz R. Rationale of periacetabular osteotomy and background work. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:229–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tonnis D, Behrens K, Tscharani F. A modified technique of the triple pelvic osteotomy: early results. J Pediatr Orthop. 1981;1(3):241–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Salter RB. Innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg. 1961;43-B:518.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Steel HH. Triple osteotomy of the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55(2):343–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ninomiya S, Tagawa H. Rotational acetabular osteotomy for the dysplastic hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(3):430–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh TS, Mast JW. A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias: technique and preliminary results. 1988. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(418):3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karam MD, Gao Y, McKinley T. Assessment of walking pattern pre and post peri-acetabular osteotomy. Iowa Orthop J. 2011;31:83–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Nunley RM, Prather H, Hunt D, Schoenecker PL, Clohisy JC. Clinical presentation of symptomatic acetabular dysplasia in skeletally mature patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93 Suppl 2:17–21. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.01735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Bergayk AB, Garbuz DS. Quality of life and sports-specific outcomes after Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84B(3):339–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Romano CL, Frigo C, Randelli G, Pedotti A. Analysis of the gait of adults who had residua of congenital dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(10):1468–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clohisy JC, Schutz AL, St John L, Schoenecker PL, Wright RW. Periacetabular osteotomy: a systematic literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(8):2041–52. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0842-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Klaue K, Durnin CW, Ganz R. The acetabular rim syndrome. A clinical presentation of dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg. 1991;73(3):423–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. Knee arthroplasty: are patients’ expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(1):55–61. doi:10.1080/17453670902805007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Byrd JW, Jones KS. Hip arthroscopy in athletes: 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(11):2140–3. doi:10.1177/0363546509337705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Londers J, Van Melkebeek J. Hip arthroscopy: outcome and patient satisfaction after 5 to 10 years. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007;73(4):478–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McCarthy J, Barsoum W, Puri L, Lee JA, Murphy S, Cooke P. The role of hip arthroscopy in the elite athlete. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;406:71–4. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000043046.84315.02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saw T, Villar R. Footballer’s hip a report of six cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86(5):655–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brunner A, Horisberger M, Herzog RF. Sports and recreation activity of patients with femoroacetabular impingement before and after arthroscopic osteoplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(5):917–22. doi:10.1177/0363546508330144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Byrd JW, Jones KS. Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(Suppl):7S–13. doi:10.1177/0363546511404144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fabricant PD, Heyworth BE, Kelly BT. Hip arthroscopy improves symptoms associated with FAI in selected adolescent athletes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):261–9. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2015-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang C, Hwang DS, Cha SM. Acetabular labral tears in patients with sports injury. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009;1(4):230–5. doi:10.4055/cios.2009.1.4.230.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Nho SJ, Magennis EM, Singh CK, Kelly BT. Outcomes after the arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in a mixed group of high-level athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(Suppl):14S–9. doi:10.1177/0363546511401900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Philippon M, Schenker M, Briggs K, Kuppersmith D. Femoroacetabular impingement in 45 professional athletes: associated pathologies and return to sport following arthroscopic decompression. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(7):908–14. doi:10.1007/s00167-007-0332-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Philippon MJ, Weiss DR, Kuppersmith DA, Briggs KK, Hay CJ. Arthroscopic labral repair and treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in professional hockey players. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(1):99–104. doi:10.1177/0363546509346393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Philippon MJ, Yen YM, Briggs KK, Kuppersmith DA, Maxwell RB. Early outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in the athletic adolescent patient: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(7):705–10. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e318186eb2e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh PJ, O'Donnell JM. The outcome of hip arthroscopy in Australian football league players: a review of 27 hips. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(6):743–9. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2009.10.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Martin RL, Kelly BT, Philippon MJ. Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(12):1304–11. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cooper AP, Basheer SZ, Maheshwari R, Regan L, Madan SS. Outcomes of hip arthroscopy. A prospective analysis and comparison between patients under 25 and over 25 years of age. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(4):234–8. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McCormick F, Nwachukwu BU, Alpaugh K, Martin SD. Predictors of hip arthroscopy outcomes for labral tears at minimum 2-year follow-up: the influence of age and arthritis. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(10):1359–64. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Philippon MJ, Schroder ESBG, Briggs KK. Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in patients aged 50 years or older. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(1):59–65. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Burnett RS, Della Rocca GJ, Prather H, Curry M, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC. Clinical presentation of patients with tears of the acetabular labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(7):1448–57. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02806.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Guevara CJ, Pietrobon R, Carothers JT, Olson SA, Vail TP. Comprehensive morphologic evaluation of the hip in patients with symptomatic labral tear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:277–85. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000246536.90371.12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Troum OM, Crues 3rd JV. The young adult with hip pain: diagnosis and medical treatment, circa 2004. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fitzgerald RH Jr. Acetabular labrum tears. Diagnosis and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;(311):60–68

    Google Scholar 

  36. Keeney JA, Peelle MW, Jackson J, Rubin D, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC. Magnetic resonance arthrography versus arthroscopy in the evaluation of articular hip pathology. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:163–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. O'Leary JA, Berend K, Vail TP. The relationship between diagnosis and outcome in arthroscopy of the hip. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(2):181–8. doi:10.1053/jars.2001.21481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hase T, Ueo T. Acetabular labral tear: arthroscopic diagnosis and treatment. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(2):138–41. doi:10.1053/ar.1999.v15.0150131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shindle MK, Ranawat A, Kelly B. Diagnosis and management of traumatic and atraumatic instability in the athletic patient. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25:309–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Braly BA, Beall DP, Martin HD. Clinical examination of the athletic hip. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25(2):199–210. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2005.12.001. vii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kelly B, Williams RJ, Philippon M. Hip arthroscopy: current indications, treatment options, and management issues. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(6):1020–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lewis CL, Sahrmann SA. Acetabular labral tears. Phys Ther. 2006;86(1):110–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. McCarthy JC, Lee J-a. Arthroscopic intervention in early hip disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:157–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Narvani AA, Tsiridis E, Kendall S, Chaudhuri R, Thomas P. A preliminary report on prevalence of acetabular labrum tears in sports patients with groin pain. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11(6):403–8. doi:10.1007/s00167-003-0390-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Larson CM, Giveans MR. Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: early outcomes measures. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(5):540–6. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.11.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Stahelin L, Stahelin T, Jolles BM, Herzog RF. Arthroscopic offset restoration in femoroacetabular cam impingement: accuracy and early clinical outcome. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(1):51–7. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.010. e51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Stevens MS, LeGay DA, Glazebrook MA, Amirault D. The evidence for hip arthroscopy: grading the current indications. J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2010;26(10):1370–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McCarthy JC, Jarrett BT, Ojeifo O, Lee JA, Bragdon CR. What factors influence long-term survivorship after hip arthroscopy? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(2):362–71. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1559-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Byrd JW, Jones KS. Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(3):741–6. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0841-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mannion AF, Impellizzeri FM, Naal FD, Leunig M. Fulfilment of patient-rated expectations predicts the outcome of surgery for femoroacetabular impingement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21(1):44–50. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2012.09.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Horstmann T, Vornholt-Koch S, Brauner T, Grau S, Mundermann A. Impact of total hip arthroplasty on pain, walking ability, and cardiovascular fitness. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(12):2025–30. doi:10.1002/jor.22163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bruyere O, Ethgen O, Neuprez A, Zegels B, Gillet P, Huskin JP, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life after total knee or hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a 7-year prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(11):1583–7. doi:10.1007/s00402-012-1583-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E, Schrijvers AJ, Marting LN, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ. Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86(6):801–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Huch K, Muller KA, Sturmer T, Brenner H, Puhl W, Gunther KP. Sports activities 5 years after total knee or hip arthroplasty: the Ulm Osteoarthritis Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(12):1715–20. doi:10.1136/ard.2004.033266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Williams DH, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Garbuz DS. Predictors of participation in sports after hip and knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(2):555–61. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2198-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Stevens M, Wagenmakers R, Groothoff JW, Bulstra SK, van den Akker-Scheek I, Zijlstra W. Physical activity behavior after total hip arthroplasty (THA): a prediction based on patient characteristics. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;69(1–3):196–9. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.08.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wylde V, Livesey C, Blom AW. Restriction in participation in leisure activities after joint replacement: an exploratory study. Age Ageing. 2012;41(2):246–9. doi:10.1093/ageing/afr180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Browne JA. The mature athlete with hip arthritis. Clin Sports Med. 2011;30(2):453–62. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2010.12.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Chatterji U, Ashworth MJ, Lewis PL, Dobson PJ. Effect of total hip arthroplasty on recreational and sporting activity. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74(6):446–9. doi:10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03028.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Golant A, Christoforou DC, Slover JD, Zuckerman JD. Athletic participation after hip and knee arthroplasty. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2010;68(2):76–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Mancuso CA, Jout J, Salvati EA, Sculco TP. Fulfillment of patients’ expectations for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(9):2073–8. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.01802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(6):1273–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Wagenmakers R, Stevens M, Groothoff JW, Zijlstra W, Bulstra SK, van Beveren J, van Raaij JJ, van den Akker-Scheek I. Physical activity behavior of patients 1 year after primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Phys Ther. 2011;91(3):373–80. doi:10.2522/ptj.20100148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wagenmakers R, Stevens M, Zijlstra W, Jacobs ML, van den Akker-Scheek I, Groothoff JW, Bulstra SK. Habitual physical activity behavior of patients after primary total hip arthroplasty. Phys Ther. 2008;88(9):1039–48. doi:10.2522/ptj.20070375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ghomrawi HM, Franco Ferrando N, Mandl LA, Do H, Noor N, Gonzalez Della Valle A. How often are patient and surgeon recovery expectations for total joint arthroplasty aligned? Results of a pilot study. HSS J. 2011;7(3):229–34. doi:10.1007/s11420-011-9203-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Jourdan C, Poiraudeau S, Descamps S, Nizard R, Hamadouche M, Anract P, Boisgard S, Galvin M, Ravaud P. Comparison of patient and surgeon expectations of total hip arthroplasty. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30195. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Moran M, Khan A, Sochart D, Andrew G. Expect the best, prepare for the worst: surgeon and patient expectation of the outcome of primary total hip and knee replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003;85:204–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Ghomrawi HM, Dolan MM, Rutledge J, Alexiades MM. Recovery expectations of hip resurfacing compared to total hip arthroplasty: a matched pairs study. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(12):1753–7. doi:10.1002/acr.20626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MG, Charlson ME. Patients’ expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12(4):387–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Nilsdotter AK, Petersson IF, Roos EM, Lohmander LS. Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62(10):923–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Keurentjes JC, Fiocco M, So-Osman C, Onstenk R, Koopman-Van Gemert AW, Poll RG, Kroon HM, Vliet Vlieland TP, Nelissen RG. Patients with severe radiographic osteoarthritis have a better prognosis in physical functioning after hip and knee replacement: a cohort-study. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59500. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Santaguida PL, Hawker GA, Hudak PL, Glazier R, Mahomed NN, Kreder HJ, Coyte PC, Wright JG. Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Can J Surg. 2008;51(6):428–36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip C. Noble MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hogen, M.G., Dwyer, M.K., Ihekweazu, U.N., Saadat, A.A., Loya-Bodiford, K.A., Noble, P.C. (2017). Activities, Symptoms, and Expectations of Patients Undergoing Hip Surgery. In: McCarthy, J., Noble, P., Villar, R. (eds) Hip Joint Restoration. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0694-5_84

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0694-5_84

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0693-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0694-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics