Skip to main content

Sex Preference for Children and Chinese Fertility in America

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Chinese Families

Abstract

Using 5 % PUMS data of the 1990 and 2000 Censuses, this study for the first time examines Chinese-American sex preference for children and its effects on their fertility behavior, in comparison with Whites. This study also explores the correlation between son preference and its determinants. A strong Confucian heritage distinguishes Chinese-Americans from the predominantly White-Christian culture, and generate more difficulties for them to acculturate to American life in comparison with Europeans, and even with other minority groups such as Blacks and Hispanics. Thereby, a research in this field, which has been never done before, would be of particular interests not only to demographers but also to scholars in other disciplines.

Offspring sex preference affects people’s fertility behavior when they need to decide whether another birth is necessary after the first one. Focusing on effects of the sex composition of previous children on the likelihood progressing to a next birth, we discover that while Chinese-Americans prefer a gender balance like Whites, they do show a strong son preference. The effects of the preference are insignificant on the second birth, but visible at higher parities.

Educational attainments play a primary role in depressing the impact of son preference. However, it by no means indicates an absence of the preference among the well-educated Chinese, especially when it comes to making decisions on later births. This research has shown that the American-born Chinese, who have greatly integrated with the dominant culture, have eventually separated themselves from Chinese traditions in terms of son preference. In comparison, the foreign-born Chinese or immigrants still display a strong son preference. This finding to certain degree gives support to the assimilation hypothesis. The role played by age should be explained carefully. The influence of son preference grows up with increasing age. On the one hand, it may reflect differing attitudes towards traditions across age groups. The younger Chinese are more open to new ideas, while the older ones do not want to break with the old world. On the other, it may simply illustrate a fact that son preference is more effective on high-order births, which used to occur at the later stages of childbearing. When approaching the end space of childbearing, the older Chinese feel more pressures from ethnic traditions and therefore decide to have another birth in hopes of having at least one son. Generally, women aged 40–44 have completed their childbearing. And their reproductive behavior would be more representative than the younger group’s.

Son preference will continue to influence Chinese reproductive behavior positively since it helps to prevent further fertility decline. Yet, the impact of the preference has been diminishing since 1990 as observed in this study. Son preference takes effects mainly on childbirth at higher parities. Those with final births beyond two children made up only 19 % of the total Chinese families in the 2000 census. That is to say, son preference works essentially on a small range of Chinese families with two or more than two previous children as only girls. These factors along with Chinese achievement in education and difficulties in the immigration process further contribute to the low fertility of the Chinese in America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

     The higher likelihood to have another child for both Chinese and White women with male children at parity 2 and other parities in Table 15.2 does not necessarily mean a preference for daughters. Since we use children-ever-born as the fertility measurement, the higher likelihood could be caused by a female survival rate, which is lower than the male one.

  2. 2.

     Once again, the higher likelihood for those with boys does not necessarily mean a preference for daughters.

References

  • Arnold, F. (1985). Measuring the effect of sex preference on fertility: The case of Korea. Demography, 22(2), 280–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts, J. (2001). Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Population and Development Review, 27(Supplement: Global Fertility Transition), 260–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts, J., & Potter, R. G. (1983). Fertility, biology, and behavior: An analysis of the proximate determinants. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. (2000). Son preference and sex composition of children: Evidence from India. Demography, 37(1), 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, L. C. (1979). Prospective fertility and women preferences: A longitudinal study in Taiwan. Population Studies, 33(3), 447–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodoo, F. N. A. (1998). Men matter: Additive and interactive gendered preferences and reproductive behavior in Kenya. Demography, 35(2, Men in Families), 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D. (1966). Path analysis: Sociological examples. American Journal of Sociology, 72(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R. (1986). Policy options after the demographic transition: The case of Taiwan. Population and Development Review, 12(1), 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R. (1997). Do family planning programs affect fertility preferences? A literature review. Studies in Family Planning, 28(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D. S., Freedman, R., & Whelpton, P. K. (1960). Size of family and preference for children of each sex. American Journal of Sociology, 66(2), 141–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knodel, J., Ruffolo, V. P., Ratanalangkarn, P., & Wongboonsin, K. (1996). Reproductive preferences and fertility trends in post-transition Thailand. Studies in Family Planning, 27(6), 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, U., Chung, W., & Gupta, M. D. (1998). Fertility and son preference in Korea. Population Studies, 52(3), 317–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNicoll, G. (2001). Government and fertility in transitional and post-transitional societies. Population and Development Review, 27(Supplement: Global Fertility Transition), 129–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merli, M. G., & Smith, H. L. (2002). Has the Chinese family planning policy been successful in changing fertility preferences? Demography, 39(3), 557–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, B. S. (1996). Sex preferences, family planning, and fertility: An Israeli subpopulation in transition. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(2), 469–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. B., & Cho, N.-H. (1995). Consequences of son preference in a low-fertility society: Imbalance of the sex ratio at birth in Korea. Population and Development Review, 21(1), 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, M. S., & Morgan, S. P. (2002). Emerging parental gender indifference? Sex composition of children and the third birth. American Sociological Review, 67(4), 600–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloane, D. M., & Lee, C.-F. (1983). Sex of previous children and intentions for further births in the United States, 1965-1976. Demography, 20(3), 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Z. (1995). Confucianism, Chinese culture and reproductive behaviour. Population Environment, 16(3), 269–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, J. D., & Schollaert, P. T. (1989). Gender of children and birth timing. Demography, 26(30), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, N. E. (1976). Sex preferences, sex control, and the status of women. Signs, 1(4), 847–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, K., & Ferguson, L. R. (1995). The stopping and spacing of childbirths and their birth-history predictors: Rational-choice theory and event-history analysis. American Sociological Review, 60(2), 272–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zongli Tang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tang, Z. (2013). Sex Preference for Children and Chinese Fertility in America. In: Kwok-bun, C. (eds) International Handbook of Chinese Families. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0266-4_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics