Abstract
In this chapter we introduce two stochastic processes that have been proposed to model the behavior of a number of commodities. We analyze their statistical properties, and also introduce their versions under risk neutrality. This paves the way to the valuation of derivative assets (like annuities, futures and options) when the underlying asset price evolves according to any of these processes over time. The first stochastic model is the Geometric Brownian Motion. This non-stationary process implies that stock price returns follow a normal distribution. This clearly imposes a precise model for asset price changes. The second model is the Inhomogenous Geometric Brownian Motion. This process displays mean reversion. The current price tends to a given level in the long term (which can be itself stochastic) at a certain speed, but is continuously impacted by random shocks. The GBM is nested in this model. Now, Ito’s Lemma allows bridge the gap between the changes in the price of the underlying asset and those in the value of the derivative asset. Thus, one can go from a model for carbon allowance price (resp., coal) to a model for the value of the option to invest in a carbon capture unit (resp., a coal-fired station). We derive formulas for the value of finite-lived annuities under both stochastic models, and similarly for futures contracts. Then we consider the perpetual option as the limiting case of a finite-lived option to invest. We fully develop a number of examples, both analytically and numerically.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This is equivalent to replacing the drift in the price process (in the GBM case,\( \alpha \)) with the growth rate in a risk-neutral world, \( r - \delta \), where \( r \) is the riskless interest rate and \( \delta \) denotes the net convenience yield. Note, though, that the convenience yield is not constant in a mean-reverting process.
References
Baker MP, Mayfield ES, Parsons JE (1998) Alternative models of uncertain commodity prices for use with modern asset pricing methods. Energy J 19(1):115–148
Benth FE, Kiesel R, Nazarova A (2012) A critical empirical study of three electricity spot price models. Energy Econ 34:1589–1616
Black F, Scholes MB (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Econ 81(3):637–654
Cortazar G, Schwartz ES (2003) Implementing a stochastic model for oil futures prices. Energy Econ 25:215–238
Dixit AK, Pindyck RS (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Keles D, Genoese M, Möst D, Fichtner W (2012) Comparison of extended mean-reversion and time series models for electricity spot price simulation considering negative prices. Energy Econ 34:1012–1032
Kloeden PE, Platen E (1992) Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations. Springer
Merton RC (1973) Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J Econ Manage Sci 4(1):141–183
Nomikos N, Andriosopoulos K (2012) Modelling energy spot prices: empirical evidence from NYMEX. Energy Econ 34:1153–1169
Pilipovic D (1998) Energy risk. McGraw-Hill
Ronn EI (2002) Real options and energy management. Risk Books
Schwartz ES (1997) The stochastic behavior of commodity prices: implications for valuation and hedging. J Finance 52(3):923–973
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abadie, L.M., Chamorro, J.M. (2013). Analytical Solutions. In: Investment in Energy Assets Under Uncertainty. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 21. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5592-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5592-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5591-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5592-8
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)