Skip to main content

On the Influence of Material Selection Decisions on Second Order Cost Factors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technology and Manufacturing Process Selection

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing ((SSAM))

  • 2415 Accesses

Abstract

Life cycle cost of manufactured parts and the selection of the manufacturing equipment to produce the parts are of the utmost importance in today’s highly competitive automotive industry. In the context of materials substitution for high volume production, a problem is often encountered on how to accurately predict the cost of manufactured parts. First order cost factors, like the cost of the raw material itself, are normally easily available, but second order factors, like tools and dies cost, amount of scrap, rework and others, are quite difficult to predict to support the substitution decision. Nevertheless, they play a major role in defining the overall life cycle cost. It becomes even harder when the new proposed material is similar to the incumbent material. In these cases, a predictive cost model will have to be sensitive to changes in the material properties to be able to correctly estimate these second order costs. The problem is that material properties are seldom directly related to manufacturing cost parameters in sufficient detail. Very often, relying on empirical models calibrated with historical data represents the only available alternative. This chapter presents discussion around these issues and follows four industrial examples where a methodology is proposed for predicting cost in the presence of alternative materials with the same manufacturing process, using empirical engineering models together with process-based cost models. The relevant manufacturing cost factors are identified and discussed, and conclusions are drawn. A generalization of the methodology is also discussed, enabling further work in different industrial situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Spring-back is the recovery of elastic deformation that occurs during stretch-forming of parts.

  2. 2.

    Line rate factor is a factor that multiplies estimated cycle time for each material. A line rate factor above one will increase cycle time.

  3. 3.

    This cost penalty was not studied.

References

  • ASM Handbook Committee, Semiatin SL (1988) Forming and forging, 9th edn. ASM International, Metals Park, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Banu M, Takamura M, Hama T, Naidim O, Teodosiu C, Makinouchi A (2006) Simulation of springback and wrinkling in stamping of a dual phase steel rail-shaped part. J Mater Process Technol 173(2):178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, Fischer G (2004) Manufacturing and potential of extruded and forged magnesium products. In: Prof. Dr Kainer KU (ed) Magnesium—alloys and technology, Wiley, Weinheim Germany, p 90–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Cora ÖN, Namiki K, Koç M (2009) Wear performance assessment of alternative stamping die materials utilizing a novel test system. Wear 267(5–8):1123–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha A, Roth R, Cirincione R, Camanho PP, Neves PC, Esteves S, Correia N, Silva A, Henriques E, Reis L, Sousa L, Pec¸as P, Baptista R, Dias GR, Viana JC, Simões R (2007) Pilot-project EDAM—MIT, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • Field F, Kirchain R, Roth R (2007) Process cost modeling: strategic engineering and economic evaluation of materials technologies. JOM 59(10):21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghomashchi MR, Vikhrov A (2000) Squeeze casting: an overview. J Mater Process Technol 101(1–3):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg S, Thilderkvist P (2002) Influence of material properties and stamping conditions on the stiffness and static dent resistance of automotive panels. Mater Des 23(8):681–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalpakjian S, Schmid SR (2008) Manufacturing processes for engineering materials, 5th edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Singh R (2007) A short note on an intelligent system for selection of materials for progressive die components. J Mater Process Technol 182(1–3):456–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leite M (2012) Techno economic evaluation in materials selection for multiple parts under OEM-Tier relations. Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang JZ, Ness JN (1996) The calculation of cooling time in injection moulding. J Mater Process Technol 57(1–2):62–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad YVRK, Sasidhara S (1997) Hot working guide: a compendium of processing maps, ASM International, Materials Park, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad YKDV, Somasundaram S (1992) CADDS: an automated die design system for sheet-metal blanking. Comput Contr Eng J 3(4):185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semiatin SL (2005) ASM handbook, vol 14A—metalworking: bulk forming. ASM International, Novelty

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang R, Altenhof W, Hu H, Li N (2008a) Rotary fatigue analysis of forged magnesium road wheels. In: International S (ed) SAE international world congress, reprinted from: magnesium technologies, 2008 (SP-2205), Detroit, Michigan, 14–17 April 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang R, Altenhof W, Hu H, Li N (2008b) Rotary fatigue analysis of forged magnesium road wheels. SAE Technical paper series 2008-01-0211

    Google Scholar 

  • Slooff FA, Dzwonczyk JS, Zhou J, Duszczyk J, Katgerman L (2010) Hot workability analysis of extruded AZ magnesium alloys with processing maps. Mater Sci Eng A 527(3):735–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddeholm tooling AB. (2011) Tooling solutions for advanced high strength steels, SSAB

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang CY, Wang XJ, Chang H, Wu K, Zheng MY (2007) Processing maps for hot working of ZK60 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 464(1–2):52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mold cost estimator. UFE Incorporated

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarlagadda PKDV, Teck Khong CA (2001) Development of a hybrid neural network system for prediction of process parameters in injection moulding. J Mater Process Technol 118(1–3):109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank the MIT Portugal Program for funding of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arlindo Silva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leite, M., Silva, A., Henriques, E. (2014). On the Influence of Material Selection Decisions on Second Order Cost Factors. In: Henriques, E., Pecas, P., Silva, A. (eds) Technology and Manufacturing Process Selection. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5544-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5544-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5543-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5544-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics