Skip to main content

Secondary Prevention in ACS: The Role of Novel Oral Anticoagulants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pharmacological Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes

Part of the book series: Current Cardiovascular Therapy ((CCT))

  • 1384 Accesses

Abstract

Currently available oral antithrombotic treatments for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome are aspirin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, warfarin, prasugrel and ticagrelor. Recently new oral anticoagulants have been evaluated in this field. Among them, rivaroxaban has shown to reduce cardiovascular events of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in a large phase III trial. However, the addition of anticoagulants to antiplatelet therapies has been consistently associated with an increased risk of bleeding. To justify use of oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention of ACS, net clinical benefit should outweigh additional risk of adverse reactions, mostly bleeding, and the costs of new oral anticoagulants. The role of novel oral anticoagulants should be determined in the context of combination or comparison with new potent P2Y12 inhibitors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson JL, Adams CD, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation. 2007;116(7):e148–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamm CW, Bassand JP, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart. 2011;J32(23):2999–3054.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jneid H, Anderson JL, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(7):645–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jneid H, Anderson JL, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with unstable angina/Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2012;126(7):875–910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127(4):e362–425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Steg PG, James SK, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart. 2012;J33(20):2569–619.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Low-molecular-weight heparin during instability in coronary artery disease, Fragmin during Instability in Coronary Artery Disease (FRISC) study group (1996) Lancet. 347(9001):561–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Long-term low-molecular-mass heparin in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators (1999) Lancet. 354(9180):701–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen M, Demers C, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparins in non-ST-segment elevation ischemia: the ESSENCE trial. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, in non-Q-wave Coronary Events. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82(5B):19L–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rothberg MB, Celestin C, et al. Warfarin plus aspirin after myocardial infarction or the acute coronary syndrome: meta-analysis with estimates of risk and benefit. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(4):241–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sorensen R, Hansen ML, et al. Risk of bleeding in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with different combinations of aspirin, clopidogrel, and vitamin K antagonists in Denmark: a retrospective analysis of nationwide registry data. Lancet. 2009;374(9706):1967–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(20):2001–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1139–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Granger CB, Alexander JH, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):981–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(10):883–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabatine MS, Antman EM, et al. Otamixaban for the treatment of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (SEPIA-ACS1 TIMI 42): a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9692):787–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wallentin L, Wilcox RG, et al. Oral ximelagatran for secondary prophylaxis after myocardial infarction: the ESTEEM randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;362(9386):789–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Oldgren J, Budaj A, et al. Dabigatran vs. placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes on dual antiplatelet therapy: a randomized, double-blind, phase II trial. Eur Heart. 2011;J32(22):2781–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Steg PG, Mehta SR, et al. RUBY-1: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the safety and tolerability of the novel oral factor Xa inhibitor darexaban (YM150) following acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart. 2011;J32(20):2541–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alexander JH, Becker RC, et al. Apixaban, an oral, direct, selective factor Xa inhibitor, in combination with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome: results of the Apixaban for Prevention of Acute Ischemic and Safety Events (APPRAISE) trial. Circulation. 2009;119(22):2877–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alexander JH, Lopes RD, et al. Apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(8):699–708.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mega JL, Braunwald E, et al. Rivaroxaban versus placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ATLAS ACS-TIMI 46): a randomised, double-blind, phase II trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9683):29–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mega JL, Braunwald E, et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(1):9–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Oldgren J, Wallentin L, et al. New oral anticoagulants in addition to single or dual antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1670–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wallentin L, Becker RC, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1045–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Roe MT, Ohman EM. A new era in secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(1):85–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Komocsi A, Vorobcsuk A, et al. Use of new-generation oral anticoagulant agents in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(20):1537–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew T. Roe MD, MHS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kang, HJ., Roe, M.T. (2014). Secondary Prevention in ACS: The Role of Novel Oral Anticoagulants. In: Avanzas, P., Clemmensen, P. (eds) Pharmacological Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes. Current Cardiovascular Therapy. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5424-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5424-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5423-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5424-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics