Abstract
With the exception of point targets, such as a free electron, the target in the elastic Coulomb scatter of a charged particle is typically distributed and screened, such as the atomic nucleus. The degree of spatial variation and Coulomb screening perceived by the projectile will be dependent upon its de Broglie wavelength of both the atom and the nucleus. In this chapter, we extend the previous discussion of elastic Coulomb scatter from a point charge to the more realistic case of a distributed and screened target. This will begin with the definition of the form factor for a spatially distributed charge that the projectile is incident to. Examples such as a hard-edge homogeneous sphere and a sphere with a charge distribution with a Gaussian radial charge distribution are considered in the calculation of these form factors.
Screened target are next considered and in much detail. We begin with the simple model of continuous screening using a Yukawa-type potential to represent that of the screened nuclear potential. A key parameter used in this model is the atomic electron screening parameter, which is the coefficient of the spatial variable in the exponent of the Yukawa form. The Thomas–Fermi statistical model of the atom is developed and its results used to derive a functional form of the atomic electron screening parameter.
We then proceed to the model of discrete screening in which the potential perceived by the projectile is the summation of those due to the atomic electrons and that due to the atomic nucleus. From this calculation is extracted the atomic elastic scattering form factor.
The outcomes of the continuous and discrete atomic electron screening models are differential cross sections which display modifications from the Rutherford (unscreened) Coulomb differential cross section which avoid the divergence at zero scattering angle.
We conclude with a numerical analysis of these results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This feature makes the measurement of elastic scattering cross sections as a useful means of discerning the internal structure of a target.
- 2.
The discussions of the screening provided in this chapter are of the target only. The projectile is considered to be ‘bare’, i.e. it is not an ion with its own atomic electrons. This particular case is discussed later within the context of energy loss.
- 3.
Carbon, at Z = 6, is selected as it represents the smallest atomic number atom that can be justifiably modelled using the Thomas–Fermi method from which we derive a screening parameter.
- 4.
For practical calculational purposes, this assumption is valid over a surprisingly long range. For example, sin θ ≈ θ to within 10 % for 0o < θ <45°.
- 5.
Ions will be considered inter alia in the derivation, but are not a focus as they are not relevant targets in medical radiation physics considerations.
- 6.
See, for example, Hoffman (1993)
- 7.
In addition, carbon would reflect the lowest atomic number that could be expected to be treated as valid in the Thomas–Fermi statistical atomic model which requires Z ≫ 1.
Bibliography and Further Readings
Dearnaley G. Ion bombardment and implantation. Rep Prog Phys. 1969;32:405–91.
ICRU. Elastic scattering of electrons and positrons. ICRU Report No. 77. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
Messiah A. Quantum mechanics, vol. II. New York: Wiley; 1958.
Monceau P, Szydlo T, Valent G. Screened Coulomb scattering versus Thomson scattering. Eur J Phys. 2003;24:47–65.
Preston MA, Bhaduri RK. Structure of the nucleus. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
Rossi B. High-energy particles. New York: Prentice-Hall; 1952.
Semon MD, Taylor JR. Screened Coulomb scattering in the Eikonal approximation. Phys Rev A. 1977;16:33–40.
References
Bohr N. The penetration of atomic particles through matter. Matt Fys Medd Dan Vild Selsk. 1948;18(8):1–144.
Bonham RA, Strand TG. Analytical expressions for potentials of neutral Thomas-Fermi-Dirac atoms and for the corresponding atomic scattering factors for x-rays and electrons. J Chem Phys. 1963;39:2200–4.
Bransden BH, Joachain CJ. Physics of atoms and molecules. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2003.
Condon EU, Odabasi H. Atomic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1980.
Dirac PAM. Note on exchange phenomena in the Thomas-Fermi atom. Proc Camb Philos Soc. 1930;26:376–85.
Fermi E. Un metodo statistic per la determinazione di alcune proprietà dell-atomo. Rend Acad Maz Lancei. 1927;6:602–7.
Firsov OB. Calculations of the interaction potential of atoms for small nuclear separations. Sov Phys JETP. 1957;5:1192–6.
Glauber RJ, Matthiae G. High-energy scattering of protons by nuclei. Nucl Phys 1970;B21:135–157
Hartree DR. The calculation of atomic structures. New York: Wiley; 1957.
Helm RH. Inelastic and elastic scattering of 187-MeV electrons from selected even-even nuclei. Phys Rev. 1956;104:1466–75.
Hoffman JD. Numerical methods for engineers and scientists. Singapore: McGraw-Hill; 1993.
Jablonski A, Salvat F, Powell CJ. Comparison of electron elastic-scattering cross sections calculated from two commonly used atomic potentials. J Phys Chem Ref Data. 2004;33:409–51.
Jackson JD. Classical electrodynamics. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 1999.
Lieb EH. Thomas-Fermi and related theories of atoms and molecules. Rev Mod Phys. 1981;53:603–41.
McParland BJ. Nuclear medicine radiation dosimetry: advanced theoretical principles. London: Springer; 2010.
Molière VG. Theorie der Streung schneller geladener Teilchen. I. Einzelstreuung am ambegeschirmten Coulomb-field. Z Naturforschg. 1947;2a:133–45.
Parr RG, Ghosh SK. Thomas-Fermi theory for atomic systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:3577–9.
Robinson MT. Interpretation of channelled ion energy loss spectra. Phys Rev. 1969;179:327–42.
Thomas LH. The calculation of atomic fields. Proc Camb Phil Soc. 1927;23:542–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McParland, B.J. (2014). Elastic Coulomb Scatter from Distributed and Screened Charges. In: Medical Radiation Dosimetry. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5403-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5403-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5402-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5403-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)