Abstract
Laparoscopy is a surgical field that has been active for several decades, but many of the harmful, long-term effects of laparoscopy on surgeons are only now being realized. Ergonomics is a field of science applied to work environments with the aim of minimizing risk of injury. In the setting of laparoscopy, ergonomics studies have elucidated some of the current drawbacks of laparoscopy. This chapter evaluates the risk factors, available instruments, and operating room setup for laparoscopic surgery. Additionally, potential solutions and methods of decreasing the risk of injury are examined. By possessing knowledge of the drawbacks of laparoscopy, surgeons may be able to protect themselves and prevent injuries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berguer R. Surgery and ergonomics. Arch Surg. 1999;134:1011–6.
Nguyen NT, Ho HS, Smith WD, Philipps C, Lewis C, De Vera RM, et al. An ergonomic evaluation of surgeons’ axial skeletal and upper extremity movements during laparoscopic and open surgery. Am J Surg. 2001;182(6):720–4.
Berguer R, Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H, Alarcon A, Chung J. A comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:139–42.
Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD. Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(5):466–8.
Gofrit ON, Mikahail AA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, Steinberg GD, Shalhav AL. Surgeons’ perceptions and injuries during and after urologic laparoscopic surgery. Urology. 2008;71(3):404–7.
Park A, Lee G, Seagull FJ, Meenaghan N, Dexter D. Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:306–13.
Franasiak J, Ko EM, Kidd J, Secord AA, Bell M, Boggess JF, Gehrig PA. Physical strain and urgent need for ergonomic training among gynecologic oncologists who perform minimally invasive surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126(3):437–42.
Rosen J, MacFarlane M, Richards C, Hannaford B, Sinanan M. Surgeon-tool force/torque signatures–evaluation of surgical skills in minimally invasive surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1999;62:290–6.
Hemal AK, Srinivas M, Charles AR. Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopy. J Endourol. 2001;15(5):499–503.
Uhrich ML, Underwood RA, Standeven JW, et al. Assessment of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:635–9.
Berguer R. Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:458–62.
Horgan LF, O’Riordan DC, Doctor N, et al. Neuropraxia following laparoscopic procedures: an occupational injury. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 1997;6:33.
Lawther RE, Kirk GR, Regan MC. Laparoscopic procedures are associated with a significant risk of digital nerve injury for general surgeons. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;84:443–4.
Van Veelen MA, Meijer DW. Ergonomics and design of laparoscopic instruments: results of a survey among laparoscopic surgeons. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999;9:481–9.
Van Veelen MA, Meijer DW, Goossens RHM, Snijders CJ. New ergonomic design criteria for handles of laparoscopic dissection forceps. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001;11: 17–26.
Berguer R, Hreljac A. The relationship between hand size and difficulty using surgical instruments: a survey of 726 laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(3):508–12.
Matern U, Eichenlaub M, Waller P, Rückauer K. MIS instruments. An experimental comparison of various ergonomic handles and their design. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(8):756–62.
Uchal M, Brogger J, Rukas R, Karlsen B, Bergamaschi R. In-line versus pistol-grip handles in a laparoscopic simulators. A randomized controlled crossover trial. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(12):1771–3.
Smith WD, Berguer R, Nguyen NT. Monitor height affects surgeons’ stress level and performance on minimally invasive surgery tasks. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;111:498–501.
Van Veelen MA, Jakimowicz JJ, Kazemier G. Improved physical ergonomics of laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2004;13:161–6.
Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A. Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg. 1998;227:481–4.
Gallagher AG, Al-Akash M, Seymour NE, Satava RM. An ergonomic analysis of the effects of camera rotation on laparoscopic performance. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(12):2684–91.
Van Veelen MA, Kazemier G, Koopman J, Goossens RH, Meijer DW. Assessment of the ergonomically optimal operating surface height for laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002;12:47–52.
Lenoir C, Steinbrecher H. Ergonomics, surgeon comfort, and theater checklists in pediatric laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010;20(3):281–91.
Galleano R, Carter F, Brown S, Frank T, Cuschieri A. Can armrests improve comfort and task performance in laparoscopic surgery? Ann Surg. 2006;243(3):329–33.
Berguer R, Smith W. An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. J Surg Res. 2006;134:87–92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gridley, C.M., Nguyen, H.T. (2014). Ergonomics of Laparoscopy. In: Godbole, P., Koyle, M., Wilcox, D. (eds) Pediatric Endourology Techniques. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5394-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5394-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5393-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5394-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)