Skip to main content

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Valve Stenosis

  • Chapter
Aortic Stenosis
  • 1779 Accesses

Abstract

Echocardiography has become the mainstay of diagnosis of patients with valvular heart disease. Its non-invasive nature, absence of side effects, and portability have rendered it a valuable tool in the diagnosis, follow up, intraoperative, post-operative evaluation of patients with severe aortic stenosis.

In this chapter we will review the comprehensive role of echocardiography in the assessment of these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Manning W. Asymptomatic aortic stenosis in the elderly: a clinical review. JAMA. 2013;310(14):1490–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bahler R, Desser D, Finkelhor R, Brener S, Youssefi M. Factors leading to progression of valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84(9):1044–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattacharyya S, Hayward C, Pepper J, Senior R. Risk stratification in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a critical appraisal. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(19):2377–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Seiler C, Jenni R. Severe aortic stenosis without left ventricular hypertrophy: prevalence, predictors, and short-term follow up after aortic valve replacement. Heart. 1996;76(3):250–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stewart R, Kerr A. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function assessed by tissue Doppler imaging and outcomes in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2216–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dalsgaard M, Egstrup K, Wachtell K, Gerdts E, Cramariuc D, Kjaergaard J, Hassager C. Left atrial volume in patients with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis (the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis study). Am J Cardiol. 2008;101(7):1030–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Casaclang-Verzosa G, Malouf J, Scott C, Juracan E, Nishimura R, Pellikka P. Does left atrial size predict mortality in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis? Echocardiography. 2010;27(2):105–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caballero-Borrego J, G’Omez-Doblas J, Cabrera-Bueno F, Garc’Ia-Pinilla J, Melero J, Porras C, Olalla E, Galv’An E. Incidence, associated factors and evolution of non-severe functional mitral regurgitation in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34(1):62–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Toggweiler S, Boone R, Rod’Es-Cabau J, Humphries K, Lee M, Nombela-Franco L, Bagur R, Willson A, Binder R, Gurvitch R, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: outcomes of patients with moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(23):2068–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kapoor N, Varadarajan P, Pai R. Echocardiographic predictors of pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9(1):31–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Malouf J, Enriquez-Sarano M, Pellikka P, Oh J, Bailey K, Chrasekaran K, Mullany C, Tajik A. Severe pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: clinical profile and prognostic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(4):789–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ross Jr J, Braunwald E. Aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1968;38(1S5):V61–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vahanian A, Otto C. Risk stratification of patients with aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(4):416–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. John D, Buellesfeld L, Yuecel S, Mueller R, Latsios G, Beucher H, Gerckens U, Grube E. Correlation of device landing zone calcification and acute procedural success in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantations with the self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(2):233–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Okura H, Yoshida K, Hozumi T, Akasaka T, Yoshikawa J. Planimetry and transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in noninvasive assessment of aortic valve area in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30(3):753–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bernard Y, Meneveau N, Vuillemenot A, Magnin D, Anguenot T, Schiele F, Bass. Planimetry of aortic valve area using multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography is not a reliable method for assessing severity of aortic stenosis. Heart. 1997;78(1):68–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers J, Evangelista A, Griffin B, Iung B, Otto C, Pellikka P, Qui~Nones M. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10(1):1–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hatle L, Angelsen B, Tromsdal A. Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Br Heart J. 1980;43(3):284–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hegrenaes L, Hatle L. Aortic stenosis in adults. Non-invasive estimation of pressure differences by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J. 1985;54(4):396–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Popovic A, Stewart W. Echocardiographic evaluation of valvular stenosis: the gold standard for the next millennium? Echocardiography. 2001;18(1):59–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ford L, Feldman T, Chiu YC, Carroll JD. Hemodynamic resistance as a measure of functional impairment in aortic valvular stenosis. Circ Res. 1990;66(1):1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mascherbauer J, Schima H, Rosenhek R, Czerny M, et al. Value and limitations of aortic valve resistance with particular consideration of low flow– low gradient aortic stenosis: an in vitro study. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(9):787–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hachicha Z, Dumesnil J, Pibarot P. Usefulness of the valvuloarterial impedance to predict adverse outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(11):1003–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bahlmann E, Gerdts E, Cramariuc D, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Nienaber C, Wachtell K, Seifert R, Chambers J, Kuck K, Ray S. Prognostic value of energy loss index in asymptomatic aortic stenosis clinical perspective. Circulation. 2013;127(10):1149–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Garcia D, Pibarot P, Dumesnil J, Sakr F, Dur. Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity a new index based on the energy loss concept. Circulation. 2000;101(7):765–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sprigings D, Chambers J, Cochrane T, Allen J, Jackson G. Ventricular stroke work loss: validation of a method of quantifying the severity of aortic stenosis and derivation of an orifice formula. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16(7):1608–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Blais C, Burwash IG, Mundigler G, Dumesinil JG, Loho N, Rader F, et al. Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (truly or pseudo-severe aortic stenosis) study. Circulation. 2006;113:711–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hahn R, Khalique O, Williams M, Koss E, Paradis J, Daneault B, Kirtane A, George I, Leon M, Kodali S. Predicting paravalvular regurgitation following transcatheter valve replacement: utility of a novel method for three-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of the aortic annulus. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(9):1043–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jilaihawi H, Doctor N, Kashif M, Chakravarty T, Rafique A, Makar M, Furugen A, Nakamura M, Mirocha J, Gheorghiu M, et al. Aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement using cross-sectional 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(9):908–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Muraru D, Badano L, Vannan M, Iliceto S. Assessment of aortic valve complex by three-dimensional echocardiography: a framework for its effective application in clinical practice. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13(7):541–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, et al. Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis: clinical, echocardiographical, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation. 1997;95:2262–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan Kerner MD, FACC, FASE .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kerner, N. (2015). Echocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Valve Stenosis. In: Abbas, A. (eds) Aortic Stenosis. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5242-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5242-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5241-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5242-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics