Skip to main content

Mean Field Games

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Systems and Control
  • 123 Accesses

Abstract

The notion of the infinite population limit of large population games where agents are realized by controlled stochastic dynamical systems is introduced. The theory of infinite population mean field games (MFGs) is then presented including the fundamental MFG equations. Proofs of the existence and uniqueness of Nash equilibrium solutions to the MFG equations are discussed, and systems possessing major agents along with the standard asymptotically negligible agents are introduced. A short bibliography is included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Altman E, Basar T, Srikant R (2002) Nash equilibria for combined flow control and routing in networks: asymptotic behavior for a large number of users. IEEE Trans Autom Control Spec Issue Control Issues Telecommun Netw 47(6):917–930, June

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann RJ, Shapley LS (1974) Values of non-atomic games. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bardi M, Feleqi E (2016) Nonlinear elliptic systems and mean-field games. Nonlinear Differ Equ Appl NoDEA 23(4):44

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Basar T, Ho YC (1974) Informational properties of the nash solutions of two stochastic nonzero-sum games. J Econ Theory 7:370–387

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Basar T, Olsder GJ (1995) Dynamic noncooperative game theory. SIAM, Philadelphia

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bauso D (2016) Robust Mean Field Games. Dyn Games Appl 6:277–303

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bensoussan A, Frehse J (1984) Nonlinear elliptic systems in stochastic game theory. J Reine Angew Math 350:23–67

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bensoussan A, Frehse J, Yam P et al (2013) Mean field games and mean field type control theory, vol 101. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bergin J, Bernhardt D (1992) Anonymous sequential games with aggregate uncertainty. J Math Econ 21:543–562. North-Holland

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Caines PE, Kizilkale AC (2016) e-nash equilibria for partially observed lqg mean field games with a major player. IEEE Trans Autom Control 62(7):3225–3234

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cardaliaguet P (2012) Notes on mean field games. Collège de France

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona R, Delarue F (2018) Probabilistic theory of mean field games with applications, vols I and II. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 83–84

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Casgrain P, Jaimungal S (2018) Algorithmic trading with partial information: a mean field game approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.04094

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa JR, Stier-Moses NE (2010) Wardrop equilibria. In: Cochran JJ (ed) Wiley encyclopedia of operations research and management science. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes DA, Saude J (2014) Mean field games models – a brief survey. Dyn Games Appl 4(2):110–154

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes DA, Pimentel EA, Voskanyan V (2016) Regularity Theory for Mean-Field Game Systems, Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haurie A, Marcotte P (1985) On the relationship between nash-cournot and wardrop equilibria. Networks 15(3):295–308

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ho YC (1980) Team decision theory and information structures. Proc IEEE 68(6):15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang MY (2010) Large-population LQG games involving a major player: the nash certainty equivalence principle. SIAM J Control Optim 48(5):3318–3353

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huang MY, Caines PE, Malhamé RP (2003) Individual and mass behaviour in large population stochastic wireless power control problems: centralized and nash equilibrium solutions. In: IEEE conference on decision and control, HI, USA, December, pp 98–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang MY, Malhamé RP, Caines PE (2006) Large population stochastic dynamic games: closed loop Kean-Vlasov systems and the nash certainty equivalence principle. Commun Inf Syst 6(3):221–252

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huang MY, Caines PE, Malhamé RP (2007) Large population cost-coupled LQG problems with non-uniform agents: individual-mass behaviour and decentralized ε – nash equilibria. IEEE Tans Autom Control 52(9):1560–1571. September

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic B, Rosenthal RW (1988) Anonymous sequential games. J Math Econ 17(1):77–87. Elsevier, February

    Google Scholar 

  • Kizilkale AC, Caines PE (2013) Mean field stochastic adaptive control. IEEE Trans Autom Control 58(4):905–920. April

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kizilkale AC, Malhamé RP (2016) Collective target tracking mean field control for Markovian jump-driven models of electric water heating loads. In Vamvoudakis K, Sarangapani J (eds) Recent advances in adaptation and control. Lecture notes in control and information sciences. Springer, pp 559–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolokoltsov VN, Malafeyav OA (2019) Many agent games in socio-economic systems: corruption, inspection, coalition building, network growth, security. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lasry JM, Lions PL (2006a) Jeux à champ moyen. I – Le cas stationnaire. Comptes Rendus Mathematique 343(9):619–625

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lasry JM, Lions PL (2006b) Jeux à champ moyen. II – Horizon fini et controle optimal. Comptes Rendus Mathematique 343(10):679–684

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lasry JM, Lions PL (2007) Mean field games. Jpn J Math 2:229–260

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ludkovski M, Sircar R (2015) Game theoretic models for energy production. In: Aïd R, Ludkovski M, Sircar R (eds) Commodities, energy and environmental finance. Springer, New York, pp 317–333

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman A (2002) Values of games with infinitely many players. In: Aumann RJ, Hart S (eds) Handbook of game theory, vol 3. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 2121–2167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen SL, Huang M (2012) Linear-quadratic-Gaussian mixed games with continuum-parametrized minor players. SIAM J Control Optim 50(5):2907–2937

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nourian M, Caines PE (2013) ε-nash mean field games theory for nonlinear stochastic dynamical systems with major and minor agents. SIAM J Control Optim 50(5):2907–2937

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sen N, Caines PE (2016) Mean field game theory with a partially observed major agent. SIAM J Control Optim 54(6):3174–3224

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tembine H, Zhu Q, Basar T (2012) Risk-sensitive mean field games. arXiv preprint arXiv:1210.2806

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardrop JG (1952) Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proc Inst Civ Eng II 1:325–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub GY, Benkard C, Van Roy B (2005) Oblivious equilibrium: a mean field approx. for large-scale dynamic games. In: Advances in neural information processing systems. MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter E. Caines .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Caines, P.E. (2019). Mean Field Games. In: Baillieul, J., Samad, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Systems and Control. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_30-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_30-2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5102-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5102-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Mean Field Games
    Published:
    24 September 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_30-2

  2. Original

    Mean Field Games
    Published:
    28 February 2014

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_30-1