Skip to main content

Publishing a Clinical Trial

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Success in Academic Surgery: Clinical Trials

Abstract

Investigators have scientific, ethical, and personal reasons for publishing the results of their clinical trials. The conduct and analysis of the trial should be done in a transparent manner, and the outcomes/endpoints that were determined a priori must be reported, regardless of the results. The conduct and analysis of the trial should be done in a transparent manner and analyses should be done on the outcomes that were decided upon a priori. A number of resources and checklists are available for ensuring all of the necessary components of the write-up are included in the manuscript. The trial results should be published, irrespective of the findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smith TL, et al. Design and results of phase I cancer clinical trials: three-year experience at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(1):287–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Estey E, et al. Therapeutic response in phase I trials of antineoplastic agents. Cancer Treat Rep. 1986;70(9):1105–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1385–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Easterbrook PJ, et al. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet. 1991;337(8746):867–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dickersin K, et al. Publication bias and clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1987;8(4):343–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Callaham ML, et al. Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. JAMA. 1998;280(3):254–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Krzyzanowska MK, Pintilie M, Tannock IF. Factors associated with failure to publish large randomized trials presented at an oncology meeting. JAMA. 2003;290(4):495–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dickersin K, Rennie D. Registering clinical trials. JAMA. 2003;290(4):516–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thornton A, Lee P. Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(2):207–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Savitz DA. Failure to publish results of epidemiologic studies is unethical. Epidemiology. 2000;11(3):361–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clinical Trials.gov. 2011. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/. Cited 3 Oct 2012.

  12. Congress t.U.S. Food and Drug Administration Act of 2007. Congress t.U.S., editor 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal editors. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/clin_trial.pdf. Cited 3 Oct 2012.

  14. Congress t.U.S. Trial and Experimental Studies Transparency Act of 2012. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Drazen JM. Transparency for clinical trials–the TEST Act. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(9):863–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. GlaxoSmithKline. Public disclosure of clinical research. 2012. Available from: http://www.gsk.com/policies/GSK-on-disclosure-of-clinical-trial-information.pdf. 3 Oct 2012

  17. Merck. Merck guidelines for publication of clinical trials and related works. 2013. Available from: http://www.merck.com/research/discovery-and-development/clinical-development/Merck-Guidelines-for-Publication-of-Clinical-Trials-and-Related-Works.pdf. Accessed 11 October 2013.

  18. Davidoff F, et al. Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. JAMA. 2001;286(10):1232–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. I.C.o.M.J., editors. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Ethical Considerations in the Conduct and Reporting of Research: Authorship and Contributorship. 2009. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/ethical_1author.html. 3 Oct 2012.

  20. Blum JA, et al. Requirements and definitions in conflict of interest policies of medical journals. JAMA. 2009;302(20):2230–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Amdur RJ, Biddle C. Institutional review board approval and publication of human research results. JAMA. 1997;277(11):909–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ruiz-Canela M, et al. Informed consent and approval by institutional review boards in published reports on clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(14):1114–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schroter S, et al. Reporting ethics committee approval and patient consent by study design in five general medical journals. J Med Ethics. 2006;32(12):718–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. N.I.o. Health, editor. NIH policy for data and safety monitoring. 1998. Available from: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-084.html. Accessed 11 October 2013.

  25. C.f.B.E.a.R. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, editors. Guidance for clinical trial sponsors. Establishment and operation of clinical trial data monitoring. 2006. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Regulatoryinformation/Guidances/ucm127073.pdf. Accessed 11 October 2013.

  26. Drazen JM, Wood AJ. Don’t mess with the DSMB. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(5):477–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mathieu S, et al. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2009;302(9):977–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Al-Marzouki S, et al. Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet. Lancet. 2008;372(9634):201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang R, et al. Statistics in medicine–reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2189–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Trials C.S.o.R. CONSORT 2010 checklist of information to include when reporting a randomised trial. 2010. Available from: www.consort-statement.org/index.aspx?o=2965.

  31. I.C.o.M.J., editor. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Manuscript Preparation and Submission: Preparing a Manuscript for Submission to a Biomedical Journal. 2009. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/manuscript_1prepare.html. 4 Oct 2012.

  32. Devereaux PJ, et al. An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(12):1232–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pocock SJ, Travison TG, Wruck LM. How to interpret figures in reports of clinical trials. BMJ. 2008;336(7654):1166–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wainer H. How to display data badly. Am Stat. 1984;38:137–47.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kelleher C, Wagener T. Ten guidelines for effective data visualization in scientific publications. Environ Model Software. 2011;26:822–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Freeman JV, Walters S, Campbell MJ. How to display data. How to series. 1st ed. Wiley, John & Sons, Oxford, UK, Incorporated; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Das N, Panjabi M. Plagiarism: why is it such a big issue for medical writers? Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2(2):67–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hopewell S, et al. Time to publication for results of clinical trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2:MR000011.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ross JS, et al. Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis. BMJ. 2012;344:d7292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hrynaszkiewicz I, et al. Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers. BMJ. 2010;340:c181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Babak J. Orandi MD, MSc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Orandi, B.J., Freischlag, J.A., Malas, M. (2014). Publishing a Clinical Trial. In: Pawlik, T., Sosa, J. (eds) Success in Academic Surgery: Clinical Trials. Success in Academic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4679-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4679-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4678-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4679-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics