Skip to main content

Is Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction Necessary?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The ACL-Deficient Knee
  • 2182 Accesses

Abstract

The surgical technique for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has evolved through the years, and the results with using various graft sources, such as a hamstring tendon graft, patellar tendon graft, or allograft, have varied considerably. An open technique for ACL surgery using an ipsilateral patellar tendon graft was the gold standard for ACL surgery in the 1980s. Stability was predictably obtained, but lack of knee range of motion and donor site morbidity was common enough for surgeons that they sought other graft sources and different surgical techniques. There was a shift to arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction, but knee stiffness and donor site morbidity problems persisted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, et al. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86-B:515–20.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amis AA, Dawkins CPC. Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacement and injuries. J Bone Joint Surg. 1991;73-B:260–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett GR, Luber K, Replogle WH, et al. Allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young, active patient: Tegner activity level and failure rate. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:1593–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrett GR, Noojin FK, Hartzog CW, et al. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: a comparison of hamstring versus patellar ­tendon autograft. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:46–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis TJ, Shelbourne KD, Klootwyk TE. Correlation of the intercondylar notch width of the femur to the width of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7:209–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gobbi A, Francisco R. Anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a semitendinosus hamstring tendon graft. In: Prodromos CC, editor. The anterior cruciate ligament. Reconstruction and basic science. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hamada M, Shino K, Horibe S, et al. Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with EndoButton femoral fixation: a prospective study. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:801–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harner CD, Baek GH, Vogrin TM, et al. Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:741–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A, et al. Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. 281 cases with 3- to 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2011. doi:10.1177/0363546511426416.

  10. Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, et al. Intraoperative biomechanical evaluation of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a navigation system. Comparison of hamstring tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1903–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jarvela T, Nyyssonen M, Kannus P, et al. Bone-patellar tendon-bone reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A long-term comparison of early and late repair. Int Orthop. 1999;23:227–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Johma NM, Borton DC, Clingeleffer AJ, et al. Long term osteoarthritic changes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees. Clin Orthop. 1999;358:188–93.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs K, et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84-A:1560–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Konda E, Yasuda K, Azuma H, et al. Prospective ­clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle ­versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1675–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meredick RB, Vance KJ, Appleby D, et al. Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1414–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park SJ, Yung YB, Jung HJ, et al. Outcome of arthroscopic single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a ­preliminary 2-year prospective study. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:630–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, et al. A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament ­reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft. A controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:564–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Refshauge K, et al. Long-term outcome of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Minimum 13-year review. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:721–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Selmi TA, Fithian D, Neyret P. The evolution of osteoarthritis in 103 patients with ACL reconstruction at 17 years follow-up. Knee. 2006;13:353–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shelbourne KD, Gray T. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft followed by accelerated rehabilitation. A two- to nine-year follow up. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:786–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shelbourne KD, Gray T. Minimum 10-year results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how the loss of normal knee motion compounds other ­factors related to the development of osteoarthritis after surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:471–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shelbourne KD, Gray T. Results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on meniscus and articular cartilage status at the time of surgery. Five- to fifteen-year evaluations. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:446–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shelbourne KD, Gray T, Haro M. Incidence of subsequent injury to either knee within 5 years after ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon graft. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:246–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shelbourne KD, Sullivan AN, Bohard K, et al. Return to basketball and soccer after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in competitive school-aged ­athletes. Sports Health. 2009;1:236–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shelbourne KD, Urch SE, Gray T, et al. Loss of ­normal knee motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with radiographic arthritic changes after surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:108–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shen W, Jordan S, Fu F. Review article: anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament ­reconstruction. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2007;15:216–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Streich NA, Friedrich K, Gotterbarm T, et al. Reconstruction of the ACL with a semitendinosus tendon graft: a prospective randomized single blinded comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle technique in male athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:232–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsuda E, Ishibashi Y, Fukuda A, et al. Comparable results between lateralized single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1042–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yasuda K. Antomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. In: Prodromos CC, editor. The anterior cruciate ligament. Reconstruction and basic science. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, et al. Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:240–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yasuda K, Tanabe Y, Kondo E, et al. Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:S21–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Donald Shelbourne M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shelbourne, K.D. (2013). Is Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction Necessary?. In: Sanchis-Alfonso, V., Monllau, J. (eds) The ACL-Deficient Knee. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4270-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4270-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4269-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4270-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics