Skip to main content

Product Containment Resources Facilitating Decision-Making in Complex Supply Networks: A Case Study of Milk Distribution from Farm to Retail

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decision-Making for Supply Chain Integration

Part of the book series: Decision Engineering ((DECENGIN,volume 1))

  • 2466 Accesses

Abstract

This study seeks to shed light on the issue of supply chain integration through highlighting interactions between decision makers with relation to the flow of goods they manage and are responsible for operating. This approach combines (1) focus on supply networks’ inherent complexity, (2) supply operations focusing on product containment facilities, and (3) Alderson’s (Dynamic marketing behavior. A functionalist theory of marketing, Richard D. Irwin, 1965) “transvection” view of product supply to develop a model regarding how decision-making may be viewed to support product supply. Through combining these views of product supply a case narrative of milk product supply from farm to retail provides the basis for modelling this supply network as decision-making events; interlinked with transformed products, information and knowledge with the ultimate purpose of value realisation from an end-user perspective. As products flow towards the end-user facilitating value creation, decision-makers are dependent on knowledge transformation within firms which is dependent on information transformation between firms as well as within firms to secure value realization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alderson, W. (1965). Dynamic marketing behavior. A functionalist theory of marketing. Illinois: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, B. (2000). Enterprise modeling for business process improvement. In A. Rolstadås & B. Andersen (Eds.), Enterprise modeling: Improving global industrial competitivenes (pp. 137–157). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballou, R. H. (1987). Basic business logistics: Transportation, materials management, physical distribution. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin, L. P. (1966). A theory of distribution channel structure. Berkeley: IBER Special Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. Y., & Dooley, K. J. (2009). Supply networks: Theories and models. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(3), 25–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. Y., & Krause, D. R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 637–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Closs, D. J., Swink, M., & Nair, A. (2005). The role of information connectivity in making logistics programs successful. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 35(4), 258–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002). Systematic Combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelseth, P. (2007). The role of the package as an information resource in the supply chain, a case study of distributing fresh foods to retailers in Norway. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, BI Norwegian School of Management, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelseth, P. (2012). Modelling transformations in a complete fresh food value network. In H. Jodlbauer, J. Olhager & R. J. Schonberger (Eds.), Modelling Value. Selected Papers of the 1 st International Conference on Value Chain Management. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, S. B., Osterhaus, P., Mangan, G. M., Brau, J. C., & McCarter, M. W. (2007). Information sharing and supply chain performance: The role of connectivity and willingness. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(5), 358–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1958). Industrial dynamics: A major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Business Review, 36(4), 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, V. (2008). Supply chain visibility: Lost in translation? Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(3), 180–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich, M., & Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: An international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Arca, J., & Prado, J. C. P. (2008). Packaging design from a supply chain approach. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(5), 375–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottinger, H. W. (1983). Coping with complexity: Perspectives for economics, management and social sciences. Dortrecht: D. Reidel.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jahre, M., & Hatteland, C. J. (2004). Packages and physical distribution—implications for integration and standardisation. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(2), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D., & Cooper, M. (2000). Issues in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockamy, A., & McCormack, K. (2004). The development of a supply chain process maturity model using concepts of business process orientation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(4), 272–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. In C. W. Morris (Ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. E., & Berger, D. W. (2001). Totally integrated enterprises: A framework and methodology for business and technology improvement. Boca Raton: St. Lucie Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, S. D., Day, J. M., Nair, A., Sawaya, W. J., & Kristal, M. M. (2007). Complexity and adaptivity in supply networks: Building supply network theory using complex adaptive systems perspective. Decision Sciences, 38(4), 4547–4580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, C. J. (1992). Enterprise integration modeling in proceedings of the first international conference, scientific and engineering computation series. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, B. (1995). Channels of Distribution. In M. Baker (Ed.), Companion encyclopedia of marketing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sezen, B. (2008). Relative effects of design, integration and information sharing on supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(3), 233–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, S. A. (2005). From supply-chain management to value network advocacy: Implications for e-supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(2), 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skilton, P. F., & Robinson, J. L. (2009). Traceability and normal accident theory: How does supply network complexity influence the traceability of adverse events? Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(3), 40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (2001). System Dynamics modelling: Tools for learning in a complex world. California Management Review, 43(4), 8–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterns, J. A., Schweikhardt, D. B., & Peterson, H. C. (1998). Using case studies as an approach for conducting agribusiness research. International Food and Agribusiness Review, 1(3), 311–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surana, A., Kumara, S., Greaves, M., & Raghavan, U. N. (2005). Supply-chain networks: A complex adaptive systems perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 43(20), 4235–4265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twede, D., & Parsons, B. (1997). Distribution Packaging for Logistical Systems. Surrey: Pira International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernadat, F. B. (1996). Enterprise modelling and integration: Principles and applications. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernadat, F. (2004, June). Enterprise Modelling: Objectives, Constructs & Ontologies. Tutorial held at the EMOI-CAISE Workshop, Riga, Latvia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Engelseth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Engelseth, P. (2012). Product Containment Resources Facilitating Decision-Making in Complex Supply Networks: A Case Study of Milk Distribution from Farm to Retail. In: Chan, H., Lettice, F., Durowoju, O. (eds) Decision-Making for Supply Chain Integration. Decision Engineering, vol 1. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4033-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4033-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4032-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4033-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics