Skip to main content

Tipping the Scales of Truth: Why the Energy Balance Equation Is a Dangerous Lie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Controversies in Obesity

Abstract

Can obesity really be reduced to a mathematical formula? Does the much-touted Energy Balance Equation really deserve its central role in this field or has focusing too much on energy balance caused us to overlook the real issues? The Energy Equation is a dangerous lie – oversimplified, inadequate, and misleading. It reflects nothing of the real truth and answers none of the important cognitive and behavioral questions of why we overeat. To tackle the global epidemic of obesity, the psychology that underpins overeating ought to be addressed. This can be done therapeutically, without becoming bogged down in analysis, simply by teaching obese patients strategies for stress management and improving self-esteem. Obesity should be tackled at its root – applying principles from behavioral and cognitive behavioral therapies to understand why people eat and how they can change: in short, promoting better beliefs about food. Most importantly, however, we need to stop lying to people and pretending that the global obesity crisis can be solved with a simple equation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), NICE Clinical Guideline CG43. Obesity: guidance on the prevention, identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in adults and children (Dec 2006, review Dec 2011) Recommendations for the public 1.1.1 p 13. Available from: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG43.

  2. Prentice AM, Jebb SA. Obesity in Britain: gluttony or sloth? BMJ. 1995;311(7002):437–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2550498/.

  3. McAllister EJ, Dhurandhar NV, Keith SW, Aronne LJ, Barger J, Baskin M, et al. Ten putative contributors to the obesity epidemic. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2009;49:868–913.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Haslam D, Sattar N, Lean M. ABC of obesity. Obesity – time to wake up. BMJ. 2006;333:640–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Shaw KA, O’Rourke P, Del Mar C, Kenardy J. Psychological interventions for overweight or obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;3:CD003818.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damian Edwards BA Hons .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Edwards, D. (2014). Tipping the Scales of Truth: Why the Energy Balance Equation Is a Dangerous Lie. In: Haslam, D., Sharma, A., le Roux, C. (eds) Controversies in Obesity. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2834-2_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2834-2_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2833-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2834-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics