Skip to main content

Using Learning Management Systems as Metacognitive Tools to Support Self-Regulation in Higher Education Contexts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 28))

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to review research that examined whether tools and features of course or learning management systems, referred to in this research as web-based pedagogical tools (WBPT), can be used to support and promote specific processes of student self-regulated learning such as goal setting, help seeking, and self-monitoring, in online and distributed learning contexts. Five categories of WBPT are described including administrative tools, content creation and delivery tools, collaborative and communication tools, learning tools, and assessment tools. In addition, research designs and data collection instruments of three studies are described. Research findings are summarized showing that WBPT can be used to support a number of self-regulatory processes and that college instructors and faculty can use WBPT to design effective learning tasks that promote student self-regulated learning. Educational implications, limitations, and future directions are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 32–44. Available from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0621.pdf

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009. Babson Survey Research Group and The Sloan Consortium. Available from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/learningondemand.pdf

  • Apedoe, X. S. (2005). The interplay of teaching conceptions and course management system design: Research implications and creative innovations for future designs. In P. McGee, C. Carmean, & A. Jafari (Eds.), Course management systems for learning: Beyond accidental pedagogy (pp. 57–68). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aviram, A., Ronen, Y., Somekh, S., Winer, A., & Sarid, A. (2008). Self-regulated personalised learning (SRPL): Developing iClass’s pedagogical model. eLearning Papers, 9. Available form http://www.slideshare.net/elearningpapers/srpl

  • Berge, Z. L. (1999). Interaction in post-secondary web-based learning (pp. 5–11). January-February: Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers in Education, 50(1), 475–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill, J. M., & Galloway, C. (2007). Perils and promises: University instructors’ integration of technology in classroom-based practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmean, C., & Brown, G. (2005). Measure for measure: Assessing course management systems. In P. McGee, C. Carmean, & A. Jafari (Eds.), Course management systems for learning: Beyond accidental pedagogy (pp. 1–13). Hershey, PA: Idea Group, Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Collis, B. (2003). Course redesign for blended learning: Modern optics for technical professionals. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 13(1/2), 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N. (2002). Using a Web-based course management tool to support face-to-face instruction. The Technology Source, March/April issue, 2002 (www.technologysource.org).

  • Dabbagh, N. (2003). Scaffolding: an important teacher competency in online learning. TechTrends for Leaders in Education and Training, 47(2), 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N. (2004). Distance learning: Emerging pedagogical issues and learning designs. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(1), 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N. (2005). Pushing the envelope: Designing authentic learning activities using Course Management Systems. In P. McGee, C. Carmean, & A. Jafari (Eds.), Course management systems for learning: Beyond accidental pedagogy (pp. 171–189). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson, Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2004). Supporting self-regulation in student-centered web-based learning environments. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5–6), 513–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2009). Exploring how experienced online instructors report using integrative learning technologies to support self-regulated learning. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 5(2), 154–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. The American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (2002). Interactive media in an interview with Chris Dede. Syllabus, June 2002, 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative & The New Media Consortium (2007). The Horizon Report 2007 Edition. Available at: http://www.nmc.org/horizon/2007/report

  • Ericsson, A. K., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. The American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2003). Blended learning environments: A review of the research literature. Provo, UT: Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2001). CoNoteS2: A software tool for promoting self-regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(2–3), 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 22–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, R., & McLoughlin, C. (2001). Developing science students’ metacognitive problem solving skills online. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, R., & McLoughlin, C. (2005). Developing the metacognitive and problem-solving skills of science students in higher education. In C. McLoughlin & A. Taji (Eds.), Teaching in the sciences: Learner-centered approaches (pp. 63–83). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R., & Zhou, Y. (2006). Designing Blended Learning Focused on Knowledge Category and Learning Activities. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitsantas, A. (2002). Test preparation and test performance: A self-regulatory analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70(2), 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitsantas, A., & Chow, A. (2007). College students’ perceived threat and preference for seeking help in traditional, distributed and distance learning environments. Computers in Education, 48(3), 383–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitsantas, A., & Dabbagh, N. (2004). Promoting self-regulation in distributed learning environments with web-based pedagogical tools: An exploratory study. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 15(1&2), 119–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitsantas, A., & Dabbagh, N. (2010). Learning to learn with Integrative Learning Technologies (ILT): A practical guide for academic success. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitsantas, A., Winsler, A., & Huie, F. (2008). Self-regulation and ability predictors of academic success during college: A predictive validity study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(1), 42–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, M., Meyer, O., & Thille, C. (2008). The Open Learning Initiative: Measuring the effectiveness of the OLI statistics course in accelerating student learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Available from http://jime.open.ac.uk/2008/14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslowski, R., Visscher, A. J., Collis, B., & Bloeman, P. P. M. (2000). The formative evaluation of a web-based course-management system within a university setting. Educational Technology, 40(30), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, B. L. (2002). The learner-centered framework on teaching and learning as a foundation for electronically networked communities and cultures. Retrieved February 13, 2002 from http://www.pt3.org/VQ/teach_learn.php3

  • Moore, A. H., & Head, J. T. (2003). Philosophy of faculty development at Virginia Tech. In D. G. Brown (Ed.), Developing faculty to use technology: Programs and strategies to enhance teaching (pp. 4–5). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (2003). Faculty use of course management systems. Boulder, CO: ECAR Research Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger, D. G., Barone, C. A., & Hawkins, B. L. (2001). Distributed education and its challenges: An overview. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. http://www.acenet.edu/bookstore/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, K. (2001). Recommendations for student tools in online course management systems. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 13(1), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reil, M., & Harasim, L. (1994). Research perspectives on network learning. Journal of Machine-Mediated Learning, 4(2&3), 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., van Merrienboer, J. G., & van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: Effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4), 551–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., Hadwin, A. F., Nesbit, J. C., Kumar, V., & Beaudoin, L. (2005). gStudy: A toolkit for developing computer-supported tutorials and researching learning strategies and instruction (version 2.0) [computer program]. Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 13–39). San Diego: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1999). Acquiring writing revision skill: Shifting from process to outcome self-regulatory goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). The hidden dimension of personal competence: Self-regulated learning and practice. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of Competence and Motivation (pp. 204–222). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing students’ use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nada Dabbagh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dabbagh, N., Kitsantas, A. (2013). Using Learning Management Systems as Metacognitive Tools to Support Self-Regulation in Higher Education Contexts. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 28. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics