Abstract
A firm that relies on bank credit can choose whether to borrow from just one bank or whether to obtain financing from multiple banks. The use of one lender is often termed relationship lending and is most often cited as a characteristic of the German banking system.1 Available anecdotal evidence suggests that this model is also present in other economies, including emerging markets. This article sets out to determine which bank financing model predominates in the Czech Republic, what its main characteristics are, and what factors the choice of bank financing model depends on at firm level. We also analyse whether the model chosen has a significant effect on the credit risk in the portfolios of relationship lenders.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aoki, M and Patrick, H. 1994: The Japanese main banking system. Oxford University Press: Oxford pp. 3–50.
Bannier, CE. 2009: Is there a hold-up benefit in heterogeneous multiple bank financing? Frankfurt School — Working Paper Series 117, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management.
Bárta, V and Singer, M. 2006: The banking sector after 15 years of restructuring: Czech experience and lessons. BIS Paper No. 28, August 2006.
Behr, A, Kamp, A, Memmel, C and Pfingsten, A. 2007: Diversification and the banks’ risk-return-characteristics — Evidence from loan portfolios of German banks. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper 05/2007.
Corsetti, G, Pesenti, P and Roubini, N. 1999: Paper tigers?: A model of the Asian crisis. European Economic Review 43: 1211–1236.
Czech National Bank. 2010: Financial Stability Report 2009/2010. Prague.
Degryse, H, Kim, M and Ongena, S. 2009: Microeconometrics of Banking. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Dewatripont, M and Maskin, E. 1995: Credit and efficiency in centralized and decentralized economies. Review of Economic Studies 624: 541–555.
Diaz-Alejandro, C. 1985: Good-bye financial repression, hello financial crash. Journal of Development Economics 191(2): 1–24.
Elsas, R. 2005: Empirical determinants of relationship lending. Journal of Financial Intermediation 14: 32–57.
Elsas, R and Krahnen, JP. 1998: Is relationship lending special? Evidence from credit files in Germany. Journal of Banking and Finance 22: 1283–1316.
Geršl, A and Jakubík, P. 2009: Models of bank financing of Czech corporations and credit risk. Financial Stability Report 2008/2009. CNB: Prague, pp. 92–101.
Geršl, A and Jakubík, P. 2010: Relationship lending in the Czech Republic. Czech National Bank Working Paper No. 1/2010.
Giovanni, F, Kang, T and Kim, I. 2001: The value of relationship banking during financial crises: Evidence from the Republic of Korea. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2553.
Gorton, G and Schmid, F. 1996: Universal banking and the performance of German firms. NBER Working Paper 5453.
Harhoff, D and Körting, T. 1998: Lending relationships in Germany: Empirical evidence from survey data. Journal of Banking and Finance 22: 1317–1353.
Hoshi, T, Kashyap, A and Scharfstein, D. 1991: Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment: Evidence from Japanese industrial groups. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1061: 33–60.
Janda, K. 2009: Bankruptcies with soft budget constraint. The Manchester School 77: 430–460.
Kreuzbergová, E. 2006: Dismantling banking socialism in the Czech Republic. Prague Social Science Studies, Public Policy and Forward Studies PPF 6/2006.
Memmel, C, Schmieder, C and Stein, I. 2007: Relationship lending — Empirical evidence for Germany. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper 14/2007.
Memmel, C, Schmieder, C and Stein, I. 2010: Marrying and breaking up: Firms and their relationship lenders. European Central Bank and Deutsche Bundesbank, mimeo.
Nam, SW. 2004: Relationship banking and its role in corporate governance. ADB Institute Research Paper Series No. 56.
OECD. 2010: Economic Survey of the Czech Republic 2010. OECD: Paris, April.
Ongena, S and Smith, D. 2000: What determines the number of bank relationships? Cross-country evidence. Journal of Financial Intermediation 9: 26–56.
Ongena, S and Smith, D. 2001: The duration of bank relationships. Journal of Financial Economics 61: 449–475.
Petersen, M and Rajan, R. 1994: The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. Journal of Finance 49: 3–37.
Rajan, R. 1992: Insiders and outsiders: The choice between relationship and arms length debt. Journal of Finance 47: 1367–1400.
Stein, I. 2011: The price impact of lending relationships. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper 4/2011.
Von Thadden, E-L. 2004: Asymmetric information, bank lending and implicit contracts: The winner’s curse. Finance Research Letters 1: 11–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Adam Geršl and Petr Jakubík
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geršl, A., Jakubík, P. (2016). Relationship Lending in Emerging Markets: Evidence from the Czech Republic. In: Brada, J.C., Wachtel, P. (eds) Global Banking Crises and Emerging Markets. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56905-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56905-9_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56185-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56905-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)