Skip to main content

The Use of the Term Perichoresis in the Trinitarian Dogma According to St. Gregory of Nyssa

  • Chapter
The Ecumenical Legacy of the Cappadocians

Part of the book series: Pathways for Ecumenical and Interreligious Dialogue ((PEID))

  • 335 Accesses

Abstract

In order to understand the ontological foundation of human existence as person, it is necessary to move from the level of an anthropological approach toward theology. It is interesting to note that in the theological field, the concept of person has undergone a long process of definition and refinement. Without going too much into the details of this process, which are not directly relevant for our issue, we will just mention that the problematics of the significance of the concept of person appeared in the context of debating the doctrine of the Holy Trinity, as a way of differentiating the Son from the Father and the Holy Spirit (differentiation that became necessary as a direct result of the Christic revelation and of the Pentecost) and at the same time of affirming the unity in diversity in the context of the intratrinitarian relationship (necessary for preserving the revelation in the Old Testament, which affirms the existence of only one God.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. St. John of Damascus, Dogmatica (An Exposition of Christian Faith), third edition, trans. D. Fecioru (Bucharest: Scripta, 1993), I.8, 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nicolae Chiţescu, Isidor Todoran, and Ilie Petreuţă, Teologia Dogmatică şi Simbolică (Dogmatic and Symbolic Theology), vol. 1, second edition (Cluj-Napoca: Renaşterea, 2004), 321.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harold H. Oliver, Metaphysics, Theology and Self: Relational Essays (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 2006), 65.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Oliver Crisp, Divinity and Humanity: The Incarnation Reconsidered (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 3;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Richard Swinburne, The Christian God (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), 209, n. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elena Vishnevskaya, “Perichoresis in the Context of Divinization: Maximus the Confessor’s Vision of a Blessed and Most Holy Embrace” (PhD diss., Drew University, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. W. H. Lampe, Patristic Greek Lexicon (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976), col. 1077.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harry Austryn Wolfson, The Philosophy of the Church Fathers: Faith, Trinity, Incarnation, third edition, revised (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970), 418–28.

    Google Scholar 

  9. St. Gregory of Nazianzus, Cele cinci cuvântări teologice (The Five Theological Orations), trans. Dumitru Stăniloae (Bucharest: Anastasia, 1993), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. L. Prestige, God in Patristic Thought (London: SPCK, 1964), 284.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miroslav Volf, After Our Likeness: The Church as the Image of the Trinity (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1998), 208–13;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Catherine Mowry LaCugna, God for Us: The Trinity and Christian Life (San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1991), 271.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richard Bauckham and Carl Mosser, The Gospel of John and Christian Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2008), 374.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peter Stemmer, “Perichorese: Zur Geschichte eines Begriffs,” Archiv für Begriffgeschichte 27 (1983): 9–55.

    Google Scholar 

  15. St. Gregory of Nyssa, Apologia in Hexaemeron (Patrologia Graeca, ed. Jacques Paul Migne [Paris: Imprimerie Catholique, 1857–66; hereafter PG] 44, 96A, 108B); Contra Eunomium I, 10, Gregorii Nysseni Opera (hereafter GNO) I, ed. Werner Jaeger (Leiden: Brill, 1960), 54, 24; De anima et resurrectione (PG 46, 113B); Oratio funebris in Flacillam imperatricem, 6, in GNO IX, ed. G. Heil and A. van Heck (Leiden: Brill, 1990), 485, 5. See Daniel F. Stramara Jr., “Gregory of Nyssa’s Terminology for Trinitarian Perichoresis,” Vigiliae Christianae 52 (1998): 257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Trinitate, 10 (PG 77, 1144B); See also B. Fraigneau-Julien, “Un traité anonyme de la Saint Trinité attribué à Cyrille d’Alexandrie,” Recherches de Science Religieuse 49 (1961): 188–211, 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Nicaea II, Acta sexta, in J. D. Mansi, Sacrorum Conciliorum Nova et Amplissima Collectio, vol. 8 (Paris: Librairie universitaire H. Welter, 1902), col. 293E.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Nicu Dumitraşcu

Copyright information

© 2016 Marius Telea

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Telea, M. (2016). The Use of the Term Perichoresis in the Trinitarian Dogma According to St. Gregory of Nyssa. In: Dumitraşcu, N. (eds) The Ecumenical Legacy of the Cappadocians. Pathways for Ecumenical and Interreligious Dialogue. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-50269-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics