Skip to main content

Important Considerations for ELISpot Validation

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Handbook of ELISPOT

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2768))

  • 242 Accesses

Abstract

The ELISpot assay has a solid place in the immune monitoring field for over 40 years. It is an assay that can assess the function of single immune cells in a straightforward and easy-to-learn approach. Its use in basic research, translational, and clinical work has been documented in countless publications. Harmonization guidelines and invaluable tools for optimal assay performance and evaluation exist. However, the validation of an established ELISpot protocol has been left to diverse opinions about how to interpret and tackle typical validation parameters. This chapter addresses important considerations for ELISpot validation, including the interpretations of validation parameters for a meaningful description of assay performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Czerkinsky CC, Nilsson LA, Nygren H et al (1983) A solid-phase enzyme-linked immunospot (Elispot) assay for enumeration of specific antibody-secreting cells. J Immunol Methods 65(1–2):109–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Janetzki S (2016) Elispot for rookies (and experts too) in techniques in life science and biomedicine for the non-expert. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45295-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Janetzki S, Panageas KS, Ben-Porat L et al (2008) Results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international Elispot proficiency panels conducted by the cancer vaccine consortium (CVC/SVI). Cancer Immunol Immunother 57(3):303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-007-0380-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Janetzki S, Price L, Schroeder H et al (2015) Guidelines for the automated evaluation of Elispot assays. Nat Protoc 10(7):1098–1115. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moodie Z, Price L, Gouttefangeas C et al (2010) Response definition criteria for Elispot assays revisited. Cancer Immunol Immunother 59(10):1489–1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-010-0875-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Moodie Z, Price L, Janetzki S et al (2012) Response determination criteria for Elispot: toward a standard that can be applied across laboratories. Methods Mol Biol 792:185–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-325-7_15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. FDA (2021) Guideline for industry. Text on validation of analytical procedures. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/q2r1-validation-analytical-procedures-text-and-methodology-guidance-industry. Accessed 09 June 2023

  8. Janetzki S, Cox JH, Oden N et al (2005) Standardization and validation issues of the Elispot assay. Methods Mol Biol 302:51–86. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-903-6:051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Patton KS, Harrison MT, Long BR et al (2021) Monitoring cell-mediated immune responses in AAV gene therapy clinical trials using a validated ifn-gamma Elispot method. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 22:183–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2021.05.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gorovits B, Azadeh M, Buchlis G et al (2023) Evaluation of cellular immune response to adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy. AAPS J 25(3):47. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-023-00814-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Islam R, Vance J, Poirier M et al (2022) Recommendations on Elispot assay validation by the GCC. Bioanalysis 14(4):187–193. https://doi.org/10.4155/bio-2022-0010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ederveen J (2010) A practical approach to biological assay validation. Hoofddorp: Prog 106(1)

    Google Scholar 

  13. CLSI (2013) Performance of single cell immune response assays; approved guideline - second edition. CLSI document I/LA26-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith JG, Liu X, Kaufhold RM et al (2001) Development and validation of a gamma interferon Elispot assay for quantitation of cellular immune responses to varicella-zoster virus. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 8(5):871–879. https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.8.5.871-879.2001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Maecker HT, Hassler J, Payne JK et al (2008) Precision and linearity targets for validation of an ifngamma Elispot, cytokine flow cytometry, and tetramer assay using CMV peptides. BMC Immunol 9:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-9-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jahnmatz P, Sundling C, Yman V et al (2020) Memory b-cell responses against merozoite antigens after acute plasmodium falciparum malaria, assessed over one year using a novel multiplexed Fluorospot assay. Front Immunol 11:619398. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.619398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Janetzki S (2018) Mastering the computational challenges of Elispot plate evaluation. Methods Mol Biol 1808:9–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8567-8_2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maecker HT, Dunn HS, Suni MA et al (2001) Use of overlapping peptide mixtures as antigens for cytokine flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods 255(1–2):27–40. S0022175901004161 [pii]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Currier JR, Kuta EG, Turk E et al (2002) A panel of MHC class I restricted viral peptides for use as a quality control for vaccine trial Elispot assays. J Immunol Methods 260(1–2):157–172. S002217590100535X [pii]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koehler NK, Genain CP, Giesser B et al (2002) The human T cell response to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein: a multiple sclerosis family-based study. J Immunol 168(11):5920–5927. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.168.11.5920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jaldén J, del Aguila Pla P (2018) Cell detection by functional inverse diffusion and non-negative group sparsity—part i: modeling and inverse problems. IEEE Trans Signal Process 60(20):5407–5421. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2018.2868258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaldén J, del Aguila Pla P (2018) Cell detection by functional inverse diffusion and non-negative group sparsity—part ii: proximal optimization and performance evaluation. IEEE Trans Signal Process 66(20):5422–5437. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2018.2868256

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvia Janetzki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Janetzki, S. (2024). Important Considerations for ELISpot Validation. In: Kalyuzhny, A.E. (eds) Handbook of ELISPOT . Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2768. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3690-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3690-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3689-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3690-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics