Abstract
Proteins are crucial for controlling different cellular processes by perceiving and converting external environmental cues into cellular responses. Therefore, regulation of protein activities is pivotal for the development and survival of an organism. This is often mediated by posttranslational modifications, which usually are carried out on specific residues of a target protein by a “writer” protein. The (reversible) modifications of different residues may lead to different signaling outputs. In the case of protein phosphorylation, one of the most common posttranslational modifications, this writer protein is a protein kinase. In this chapter, we report a comprehensive and versatile workflow to identify the phosphorylation profile of a target protein in plants from a putative kinase-target pair by combining an in planta phosphorylation assay and mass spectrometry analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vu LD, Gevaert K, De Smet I (2018) Protein language: post-translational modifications talking to each other. Trends Plant Sci 23:1068–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.09.004
Matthews HR (1995) Protein kinases and phosphatases that act on histidine, lysine, or arginine residues in eukaryotic proteins: a possible regulator of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Pharmacol Ther 67:323–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-7258(95)00020-8
Jagodzik P, Tajdel-Zielinska M, Ciesla A et al (2018) Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plant hormone signaling. Front Plant Sci 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01387
Tena G, Boudsocq M, Sheen J (2011) Protein kinase signaling networks in plant innate immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol 14:519–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2011.05.006
Zhu J-K (2016) Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell 167:313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029
Zulawski M, Schulze G, Braginets R et al (2014) The Arabidopsis Kinome: phylogeny and evolutionary insights into functional diversification. BMC Genomics 15:548. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-548
Van Leene J, Han C, Gadeyne A et al (2019) Capturing the phosphorylation and protein interaction landscape of the plant TOR kinase. Nat Plants 5:316–327. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0378-z
Taylor I, Wang Y, Seitz K et al (2016) Analysis of phosphorylation of the receptor-like protein kinase HAESA during Arabidopsis floral abscission. PLoS One 11:e0147203. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147203
Hastie CJ, McLauchlan HJ, Cohen P (2006) Assay of protein kinases using radiolabeled ATP: a protocol. Nat Protoc 1:968–971. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.149
Jiang Y, Han B, Zhang H et al (2019) MAP4K4 associates with BIK1 to regulate plant innate immunity. EMBO Rep 20. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201947965
Woodgett JR, Gould KL, Hunter T (1986) Substrate specificity of protein kinase C. Use of synthetic peptides corresponding to physiological sites as probes for substrate recognition requirements. Eur J Biochem 161:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb10139.x
Modi V, Dunbrack RL (2019) Defining a new nomenclature for the structures of active and inactive kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116:6818–6827. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814279116
Beenstock J, Mooshayef N, Engelberg D (2016) How do protein kinases take a selfie (autophosphorylate)? Trends Biochem Sci 41:938–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2016.08.006
Hofgen R, Willmitzer L (1988) Storage of competent cells for Agrobacterium transformation. Nucleic Acids Res 16:9877–9877. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/16.20.9877
Vu LD, Stes E, Van Bel M et al (2016) Up-to-date workflow for plant (phospho)proteomics identifies differential drought-responsive phosphorylation events in maize leaves. J Proteome Res 15:4304–4317. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00348
Tyanova S, Temu T, Cox J (2016) The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat Protoc 11:2301–2319. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.136
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Xu, X., Gevaert, K., De Smet, I., Vu, L.D. (2023). Targeted Profiling of Protein Phosphorylation in Plants. In: Gevaert, K. (eds) Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2718. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3457-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3457-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3456-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3457-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols