Skip to main content

Validation Procedures for Quantification of Food Allergens by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Food Allergens

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2717))

  • 573 Accesses

Abstract

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a widely used analytical technique for food allergen detection and quantification. Validating ELISA protocols is important for both assay developers and end users as it ensures method reliability. This chapter describes the protocols for validating the sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, robustness, and ruggedness of an ELISA. Example procedures are also provided for sample preparation, allergen extraction, and ELISA operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sathe SK, Liu C, Zaffran VD (2016) Food allergy. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 7:191–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta S, Sathe SK, Su M et al (2021) Germination reduces black gram (Vigna mungo) and mung bean (Vigna radiata) vicilin immunoreactivity. LWT Food Sci Technol 135:110217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharma GM, Roux KH, Sathe SK (2009) A sensitive and robust competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa L.) detection. J Agric Food Chem 57:769–776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu C, Chhabra GS, Sathe SK (2015) Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) detection and quantification using a murine monoclonal antibody-based direct sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Agric Food Chem 63:9139–9149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Su M, Venkatachalam M, Liu C et al (2013) A murine monoclonal antibody based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for almond (Prunus dulcis L.) detection. J Agric Food Chem 61:10823–10833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cucu T, Jacxsens L, De Meulenaer B (2013) Analysis to support allergen risk management: which way to go? J Agric Food Chem 61:5624–5633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jayasena S, Smits M, Fiechter D et al (2015) Comparison of six commercial ELISA kits for their specificity and sensitivity in detecting different major peanut allergens. J Agric Food Chem 63:1849–1855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Hengel AJ (2007) Food allergen detection methods and the challenge to protect food-allergic consumers. Anal Bioanal Chem 389:111–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tiwari RS, Venkatachalam M, Sharma GM et al (2010) Effect of food matrix on amandin, almond (Prunus dulcis L.) major protein, immunorecognition and recovery. LWT Food Sci Technol 43:675–683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Montserrat M, Sanz D, Juan T et al (2015) Detection of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergens in processed foods by immunoassay: influence of selected target protein and ELISA format applied. Food Control 54:300–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Abbott M, Hayward S, Ross W et al (2010) Validation procedures for quantitative food allergen ELISA methods: community guidance and best practices. J AOAC Int 93:442–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koerner TB, Abbott M, Godefroy SB et al (2013) Validation procedures for quantitative gluten ELISA methods: AOAC allergen community guidance and best practices. J AOAC Int 96:1033–1040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu C, Chhabra GS, Zhao J et al (2017) Comparison of laboratory-developed and commercial monoclonal antibody-based sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for almond (Prunus dulcis) detection and quantification. J Food Sci 82:2504–2515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu C, Zaffran VD, Gupta S et al (2019) Pecan (Carya illinoinensis) detection using a monoclonal antibody-based direct sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. LWT Food Sci Technol 116:108516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu C (2016) Evaluation of monoclonal antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for tree nuts and peanut detection. Florida State University

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mattarozzi M, Careri M (2019) The role of incurred materials in method development and validation to account for food processing effects in food allergen analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem 411:4465–4480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Segura-Gil I, Nicolau-Lapeña I, Galán-Malo P et al (2018) Development of two ELISA formats to determine glycinin. Application to detect soy in model and commercial processed food. Food Control 93:32–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Parker CH, Khuda SE, Pereira M et al (2015) Multi-allergen quantitation and the impact of thermal treatment in industry-processed baked goods by ELISA and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem 63:10669–10680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bugyi Z, Nagy J, Török K et al (2010) Towards development of incurred materials for quality assurance purposes in the analysis of food allergens. Anal Chim Acta 672:25–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Monaci L, Brohée M, Tregoat V et al (2011) Influence of baking time and matrix effects on the detection of milk allergens in cookie model food system by ELISA. Food Chem 127:669–675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bugyi Z, Török K, Hajas L et al (2013) Comparative study of commercially available gluten ELISA kits using an incurred reference material. Qual Assur Saf Crops Food 5:79–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dumont V, Kerbach S, Poms R et al (2010) Development of milk and egg incurred reference materials for the validation of food allergen detection methods. Qual Assur Saf Crops Food 2:208–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Khuda S, Slate A, Pereira M et al (2012) Effect of processing on recovery and variability associated with immunochemical analytical methods for multiple allergens in a single matrix: sugar cookies. J Agric Food Chem 60:4195–4203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gomaa A, Boye J (2015) Simultaneous detection of multi-allergens in an incurred food matrix using ELISA, multiplex flow cytometry and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Food Chem 175:585–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mena MC, Lombardía M, Hernando A et al (2012) Comprehensive analysis of gluten in processed foods using a new extraction method and a competitive ELISA based on the R5 antibody. Talanta 91:33–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharma GM, Khuda SE, Pereira M et al (2013) Development of an incurred cornbread model for gluten detection by immunoassays. J Agric Food Chem 61:12146–12154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shibahara Y, Uesaka Y, Wang J et al (2013) A sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of fish protein in processed foods. Food Chem 136:675–681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nimata M, Okada H, Kurihara K et al (2018) A harmonized immunoassay with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis in egg allergen determination. Anal Bioanal Chem 410:325–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Azarnia S, Boye JI, Mongeon V et al (2013) Detection of ovalbumin in egg white, whole egg and incurred pasta using LC-ESI-MS/MS and ELISA. Food Res Int 52:526–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wild D (2013) The immunoassay handbook: theory and applications of ligand binding, ELISA and related techniques. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  31. FDA (1997) Validation of analytical procedures: methodology. Fed Regist 62:27463–27467

    Google Scholar 

  32. IUPAC (1998) Compendium of analytical nomenclature. In: Inczédy J, Lengyel T, Ure AM, Freiser H (eds) IUPAC chemical nomenclature series. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  33. ISO (2008) ISO 11843-5:2008 Capability of detection. Part 5: Methodology in the linear and non-linear calibration cases. International Organization for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  34. ISO (1994) ISO 5725-2 Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 2: Basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method. International Organization for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dhakal S, Liu C, Zhang Y et al (2014) Effect of high pressure processing on the immunoreactivity of almond milk. Food Res Int 62:215–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chhabra GS, Liu C, Su M et al (2017) Effects of the Maillard reaction on the immunoreactivity of amandin in food matrices. J Food Sci 82:2495–2503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang Y, Liu C, Su M et al (2018) Effect of phenolics on amandin immunoreactivity. LWT Food Sci Technol 98:515–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Stephan O, Vieths S (2004) Development of a real-time PCR and a sandwich ELISA for detection of potentially allergenic trace amounts of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) in processed foods. J Agric Food Chem 52:3754–3760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Su M, Liu C, Roux KH et al (2017) Effects of processing and storage on almond (Prunus dulcis L.) amandin immunoreactivity. Food Res Int 100:87–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Allen KJ, Remington BC, Baumert JL et al (2014) Allergen reference doses for precautionary labeling (VITAL 2.0): clinical implications. J Allergy Clin Immunol 133:156–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ballmer-Weber BK, Fernandez-Rivas M, Beyer K et al (2015) How much is too much? Threshold dose distributions for 5 food allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 135:964–971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Su M, Venkatachalam M, Gradziel TM et al (2015) Application of mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb) 4C10-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for amandin detection in almond (Prunus dulcis L.) genotypes and hybrids. LWT Food Sci Technol 60:535–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Noble KA, Liu C, Sathe SK et al (2017) A cherry seed-derived spice, mahleb, is recognized by anti-almond antibodies including almond-allergic patient IgE. J Food Sci 82:1786–1791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our late professor, Dr. Shridhar K. Sathe, is acknowledged for his guidance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changqi Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Liu, C., Su, M., Champ, V.D., Gupta, S. (2024). Validation Procedures for Quantification of Food Allergens by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). In: Cabanillas, B. (eds) Food Allergens. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2717. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3453-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3453-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3452-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3453-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics