Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of multivariate methods and several advanced demonstrations of how these methods can be applied to machine learning applications in mental health. Multivariate methods can help identify relationships between different variables (symptoms, behavior, brain anatomy, brain function, genetics, etc.) that may influence mental health. The methods provide valuable insights into how best to target interventions for a particular brain disorder. When using these methods, it is important to know the advantages, but also the limitations, of each method and how they can be applied in different contexts. In this chapter, we define and explain the concept of multivariate analyses from the theoretical basis to practical issues related to data preparation and interpretation of results. The methods described here include factor analysis, principal component analysis, path analysis, partial least squares, and linear multivariate methods. The chapter includes examples of how multivariate methods have been used, for example, to predict treatment outcomes or identify risk factors for mental disorders. We not only discuss the many challenges of using these methods in computational neuroscience research, such as the need for large and diverse datasets, but also introduce new approaches, such as guided model-based approaches and advanced AI-based approaches, to enrich these mostly data-driven methods and obtain better insight that integrates a priori information.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kherif F, Latypova A (2020) Principal component analysis. Machine Learning, 209–225
Tabachnick B, Fidell L, Ullman J (2013) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson, Boston, MA
Friston K, Frith C, Frackowiak R, Turner R (1995) Characterizing dynamic brain responses with fMRI: a multivariate approach. Neuroimage 2:166–172
Lima A, Mridha M, Das S, Kabir M, Islam M, Watanobe Y (2022) A comprehensive survey on the detection, classification, and challenges of neurological disorders. Biology:11. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/11/3/469
Oala L, Fehr J, Gilli L, Balachandran P, Leite A, Calderon-Ramirez S, Li D, Nobis G, Alvarado E, Jaramillo-Gutierrez G, Others (2020) Ml4h auditing: From paper to practice. Mach Learn Health, 280–317
Kherif F, Josse G, Seghier M, Price C (2009) The main sources of intersubject variability in neuronal activation for reading aloud. J Cogn Neurosci 21:654–668
Simon O, Kherif F, Flandin G, Poline J, Riviere D, Mangin J, Le Bihan D, Dehaene S (2004) Automatized clustering and functional geometry of human parietofrontal networks for language, space, and number. Neuroimage 23:1192–1202
Melie-Garcia L, Slater D, Ruef A, Sanabria-Diaz G, Preisig M, Kherif F, Draganski B, Lutti A (2018) Networks of myelin covariance. Hum Brain Mapp 39:1532–1554
Sanabria-Diaz G, Melie-Garcia L, Draganski B, Demonet J, Kherif F (2021) Apolipoprotein E4 effects on topological brain network organization in mild cognitive impairment. Scientific Reports 11:845
Sanabria-Diaz G, Demonet J, Rodriguez-Herreros B, Draganski B, Kherif F, Melie-Garcia L (2021) Apolipoprotein E allele 4 effects on Single-Subject Gray Matter Networks in Mild Cognitive Impairment. NeuroImage Clinical 32:102799
Mihalik A, Chapman J, Adams R, Winter N, Ferreira F, Shawe-Taylor J, Mourão-Miranda J, Initiative A, Others (2022) Canonical correlation analysis and partial least squares for identifying brain-behaviour associations: a tutorial and a comparative study. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimag 77(11):1055–1067
Wang H, Smallwood J, Mourao-Miranda J, Xia C, Satterthwaite T, Bassett D, Bzdok D (2020) Finding the needle in a high-dimensional haystack: Canonical correlation analysis for neuroscientists. NeuroImage 216:116745
McIntosh A, Lobaugh N (2004) Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances. Neuroimage 23:S250–S263
Worsley KJ, Poline JB, Friston KJ, Evans AC (1997) Characterizing the response of PET and fMRI data using multivariate linear models. NeuroImage 6(4):305–319
Kherif F, Poline JB, Flandin G, Benali H, Simon O, Dehaene S, et al. (2002) Multivariate model specification for fMRI data. NeuroImage 16(4):1068–1083
Zufferey V, Donati A, Popp J, Meuli R, Rossier J, Frackowiak R, Draganski B, Gunten A, Kherif F (2017) Neuroticism, depression, and anxiety traits exacerbate the state of cognitive impairment and hippocampal vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dementia Diagnosis Assessment Disease Monitoring 7:107–114
Draganski B, Lutti A, Kherif F (2013) Impact of brain aging and neurodegeneration on cognition: evidence from MRI. Curr Opin Neurol 26:640–645
Draganski B, Kherif F, Lutti A (2014) Computational anatomy for studying use-dependant brain plasticity. Front Hum Neurosci 8:380
Kawasaki Y, Suzuki M, Kherif F, Takahashi T, Zhou S-Y, Nakamura K, Matsui M, Sumiyoshi T, Seto H, Kurachi M (2007) Multivariate voxel-based morphometry successfully differentiates schizophrenia patients from healthy controls. NeuroImage 34(1):235–242. ISSN 1053-8119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.018
Good CD, Johnsrude IS, Ashburner J, Henson RN, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS (2001) A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 14(1):21–36
Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2000) Voxel-based morphometry—the methods. NeuroImage 11(6):805–821. ISSN 1053-8119. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0582
Kandilarova S, Stoyanov D, Stoeva M, et al. (2020) Functional MRI in depression—multivariate analysis of emotional task. J Med Biol Eng 40:535–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-020-00547-2
Stoyanov D, Kandilarova S, Aryutova K, Paunova R, Todeva-Radneva A, Latypova A, Kherif F (2021) Multivariate analysis of structural and functional neuroimaging can inform psychiatric differential diagnosis. Diagnostics 11:19. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010019
Paunova R, Kandilarova S, Todeva-Radneva A, Latypova A, Kherif F, Stoyanov D (2022) Application of mass multivariate analysis on neuroimaging data sets for precision diagnostics of depression. Diagnostics 12:469. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020469
Taubert M, Roggenhofer E, Melie-Garcia L, Muller S, Lehmann N, Preisig M, Vollenweider P, Marques-Vidal P, Lutti A, Kherif F, Others (2020) Converging patterns of aging-associated brain volume loss and tissue microstructure differences. Neurobiol Aging 88:108–118
Marchewka A, Kherif F, Krueger G, Grabowska A, Frackowiak R, Draganski B, Initiative A (2014) Influence of magnetic field strength and image registration strategy on voxel-based morphometry in a study of Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Brain Mapp 35:1865–1874
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Kherif, F., Ramponi, C., Latypova, A., Paunova, R. (2023). Premises of Computational Neuroscience: Machine Learning Tools and Multivariate Analyses. In: Stoyanov, D., Draganski, B., Brambilla, P., Lamm, C. (eds) Computational Neuroscience. Neuromethods, vol 199. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3230-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3230-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3229-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3230-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols