Skip to main content

Measuring Touch Sensitivity in an Aging Population

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Somatosensory Research Methods

Part of the book series: Neuromethods ((NM,volume 196))

Abstract

As we age, our touch sensitivity declines due to changes in the skin, receptors, afferent nerve fibers, and central nervous system. Aging also results in changes in the speed and accuracy of movements. Such changes have the potential to impact exploratory strategies used in active touch. Some of the motor changes during exploration may themselves reflect changing somatosensory signals supporting movement execution. At the same time as sensorimotor changes, aging results in cognitive changes spanning perception, attention, memory, and motivation. When studying somatosensation over the lifespan, it is important to design tasks and performance measures that make it possible to determine the underlying sensory basis for age-related changes, while controlling for the cognitive effects of aging. This chapter discusses some of the issues arising when testing older participants. We suggest various practical adjustments to testing somatosensory functions that allow comparisons of performance across different age groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roberts KL, Allen HA (2016) Perception and cognition in the ageing brain: a brief review of the short-and long-term links between perceptual and cognitive decline. Frontiers in aging neuroscience 8:39

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis AC (1989) The prevalence of hearing impairment and reported hearing disability among adults in Great Britain. Int J Epidemiol 18(4):911–917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cruickshanks KJ et al (1998) Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin: the epidemiology of hearing loss study. Am J Epidemiol 148(9):879–886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson D et al (1999) The epidemiology of hearing impairment in an Australian adult population. Int J Epidemiol 28(2):247–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goman AM, Lin FR (2016) Prevalence of hearing loss by severity in the United States. Am J Public Health 106(10):1820–1822

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Varma R et al (2016) Visual impairment and blindness in adults in the United States: demographic and geographic variations from 2015 to 2050. JAMA Ophthalmol 134(7):802–809

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Swenor BK et al (2013) The prevalence of concurrent hearing and vision impairment in the United States. JAMA Intern Med 173(4):312–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Salvi S, Akhtar S, Currie Z (2006) Ageing changes in the eye. Postgrad Med J 82(971):581–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Said FS, Weale RA (1959) The variation with age of the spectral transmissivity of the living human crystalline lens. Gerontology 3(4):213–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruddock K (1965) The effect of age upon colour vision—II. changes with age in light transmission of the ocular media. Vis Res 5(1–3):47–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scholl HP, Massof RW, West S (2013) Ophthalmology and the ageing society. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu X, Yan D (2007) Ageing and hearing loss. J Pathol: A Journal of the Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland 211(2):188–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Weinstein B (1994) Age-related hearing loss: how to screen for it, and when to intervene. Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) 49(8):40–5; quiz 46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts RD, et al Force modulation during tactile perception in an ageing population.. In Preparation

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hurley MV, Rees J, Newham DJ (1998) Quadriceps function, proprioceptive acuity and functional performance in healthy young, middle-aged and elderly subjects. Age Ageing 27(1):55–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Landelle C et al (2021) Contribution of muscle proprioception to limb movement perception and proprioceptive decline with ageing. Curr Opin Physio 20:180–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goble DJ et al (2009) Proprioceptive sensibility in the elderly: degeneration, functional consequences and plastic-adaptive processes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33(3):271–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stevens JC, Patterson MQ (1995) Dimensions of spatial acuity in the touch sense: changes over the life span. Somatosens Mot Res 12(1):29–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stevens JC (1992) Aging and spatial acuity of touch. J Gerontol 47(1):P35–P40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bolton CF, Winkelmann R, Dyck PJ (1966) A quantitative study of Meissner's corpuscles in man. Neurology 16(1):1–1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gescheider GA et al (1994) The effects of aging on information-processing channels in the sense of touch: I. Absolute sensitivity. Somatosens Mot Res 11(4):345–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cerimele D, Celleno L, Serri F (1990) Physiological changes in ageing skin. Br J Dermatol 122:13–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. García-Piqueras J et al (2019) Ageing of the somatosensory system at the periphery: age-related changes in cutaneous mechanoreceptors. J Anat 234(6):839–852

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fenske NA, Lober CW (1986) Structural and functional changes of normal aging skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 15(4):571–585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gerhardt LC et al (2009) Skin–textile friction and skin elasticity in young and aged persons. Skin Res Technol 15(3):288–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ryu HS et al (2008) Influence of age and regional differences on skin elasticity as measured by the Cutometer®. Skin Res Technol 14(3):354–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilhelm K-P, Cua AB, Maibach HI (1991) Skin aging: effect on transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, skin surface pH, and casual sebum content. Arch Dermatol 127(12):1806–1809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang S, Duan E (2018) Fighting against skin aging: the way from bench to bedside. Cell Transplant 27(5):729–738

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Abdouni A et al (2017) Biophysical properties of the human finger for touch comprehension: influences of ageing and gender. R Soc Open Sci 4(8):170321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bruce MF (1980) The relation of tactile thresholds to histology in the fingers of elderly people. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 43(8):730–734

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Peters A (2009) The effects of normal aging on myelinated nerve fibers in monkey central nervous system. Front Neuroanat 3:11

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Decorps J et al (2014) Effect of ageing on tactile transduction processes. Ageing Res Rev 13:90–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McIntyre S et al (2021) The effects of ageing on tactile function in humans. Neuroscience 464:53–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Deflorio D, Di Luca M, Wing AM Skin stiffness and afferent density in the deterioration of tactile spatial acuity with age. J Physiol. Under review

    Google Scholar 

  35. Craik FI, Salthouse TA (2011) The handbook of aging and cognition. Psychology Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Cabeza R (2002) Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. Psychol Aging 17(1):85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Raz N et al (2005) Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers. Cerebral Cortex 15(11):1676–1689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Brodoehl S et al (2013) Age-related changes in the somatosensory processing of tactile stimulation—an fMRI study. Behav Brain Res 238:259–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Diaconescu AO, Hasher L, McIntosh AR (2013) Visual dominance and multisensory integration changes with age. NeuroImage 65:152–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Laurienti PJ et al (2006) Enhanced multisensory integration in older adults. Neurobiol Aging 27(8):1155–1163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Peiffer AM et al (2007) Age-related multisensory enhancement in a simple audiovisual detection task. Neuroreport 18(10):1077–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Li KZH, Lindenberger U (2002) Relations between aging sensory/sensorimotor and cognitive functions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 26(7):777–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jones SA, Noppeney U (2021) Ageing and multisensory integration: a review of the evidence, and a computational perspective. Cortex 138:1–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Elliott MT, Wing AM, Welchman AE (2011) The effect of ageing on multisensory integration for the control of movement timing. Exp Brain Res 213(2):291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Stothart G, Kazanina N (2016) Auditory perception in the aging brain: the role of inhibition and facilitation in early processing. Neurobiol Aging 47:23–34

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Hasher L, Zacks RT (1988) Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. In: Bower GH (ed) Psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press, pp 193–225

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gazzaley A et al (2008) Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(35):13122–13126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Vallesi A et al (2009) Age-related differences in processing irrelevant information: evidence from event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia 47(2):577–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dully J, McGovern DP, O’Connell RG (2018) The impact of natural aging on computational and neural indices of perceptual decision making: a review. Behav Brain Res 355:48–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Haloua MH, Sierevelt I, Theuvenet WJ (2011) Semmes-weinstein monofilaments: influence of temperature, humidity, and age. J Hand Surg Am 36(7):1191–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Werner MU, Rotbøll-Nielsen P, Ellehuus-Hilmersson C (2011) Humidity affects the performance of von Frey monofilaments. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 55(5):577–582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Skedung L et al (2018) Mechanisms of tactile sensory deterioration amongst the elderly. Sci Rep 8(1):5303

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Gescheider GA et al (1997) The effects of skin temperature on the detection and discrimination of tactile stimulation. Somatosens Mot Res 14(3):181–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang Z et al (2009) The impact of non-noxious heat on tactile information processing. Brain Res 1302:97–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Libouton X et al (2010) Tactile roughness discrimination threshold is unrelated to tactile spatial acuity. Behav Brain Res 208(2):473–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bleyenheuft Y, Thonnard JL (2007) Tactile spatial resolution measured manually: a validation study. Somatosens Mot Res 24(3):111–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Goldreich D, Kanics IM (2003) Tactile acuity is enhanced in blindness. J Neurosci 23(8):3439–3445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (1987) Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition. Cogn Psychol 19(3):342–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Matula DE (1991) Imagined haptic exploration in judgments of object properties. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 17(2):314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Balakrishnan J (1991) Task–driven extraction of object contour by human haptics: part 1. Robotica 9(1):43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Yamamoto S, Kitazawa S (2001) Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing. Nat Neurosci 4(7):759–765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Shore DI, Spry E, Spence C (2002) Confusing the mind by crossing the hands. Cogn Brain Res 14(1):153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Roberts RD, Humphreys GW (2008) Task effects on tactile temporal order judgments: when space does and does not matter. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 34(3):592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Badde S, Röder B, Bruns P (2018) Task-irrelevant sounds influence both temporal order and apparent-motion judgments about tactile stimuli applied to crossed and uncrossed hands. Atten Percept Psychophys 80(3):773–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hollins SJB, Washburn S, Mark (2001) Vibrotactile adaptation impairs discrimination of fine, but not coarse, textures. Somatosens Mot Res 18(4):253–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hollins M, Fox A, Bishop C (2000) Imposed vibration influences perceived tactile smoothness. Perception 29(12):1455–1465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Montagna W, Carlisle K (1990) Structural changes in ageing skin. Br J Dermatol 122(s35):61–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Alexander H, Cook T (2006) Variations with age in the mechanical properties of human skin in vivo. J Tissue Viability 16(3):6–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Namer B (2010) Age related changes in human C-fiber function. Neurosci Lett 470(3):185–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Fromy B et al (2010) Aging-associated sensory neuropathy alters pressure-induced vasodilation in humans. J Investig Dermatol 130(3):849–855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Van Boven RW et al (2000) Tactile spatial resolution in blind Braille readers. Neurology 54(12):2230–2236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Peters RM, Hackeman E, Goldreich D (2009) Diminutive digits discern delicate details: fingertip size and the sex difference in tactile spatial acuity. J Neurosci 29(50):15756–15761

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Dillon YK, Haynes J, Henneberg M (2001) The relationship of the number of Meissner's corpuscles to dermatoglyphic characters and finger size. J Anatom 199(5):577–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Morioka M, Whitehouse DJ, Griffin MJ (2008) Vibrotactile thresholds at the fingertip, volar forearm, large toe, and heel. Somatosens Mot Res 25(2):101–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Venkatesan L, Barlow SM, Kieweg D (2015) Age-and sex-related changes in vibrotactile sensitivity of hand and face in neurotypical adults. Somatosens Mot Res 32(1):44–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Verrillo RT (1979) Comparison of vibrotactile threshold and suprathreshold responses in men and women. Percept Psychophys 26(1):20–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Fruhstorfer H et al (2000) Thickness of the stratum corneum of the volar fingertips. Clin Anat 13(6):429–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Vierkötter A et al (2010) Airborne particle exposure and extrinsic skin aging. J Investig Dermatol 130(12):2719–2726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Meister H et al (2016) Effects of hearing loss and cognitive load on speech recognition with competing talkers. Front Psychol 7:301

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Hollins M, Risner SR (2000) Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception. Percept Psychophys 62(4):695–705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Katz D (1989) The world of touch (LE Krueger, Trans.). Rrlbaum.(Original work published 1925), Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  82. Cornsweet TN (1962) The staircase-method in psychophysics. Am J Psychol 75(3):485–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Desrosiers J et al (1995) The Purdue Pegboard Test: normative data for people aged 60 and over. Disabil Rehabil 17(5):217–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aldrin R. Loomes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Loomes, A.R., Roberts, R., Allen, H.A. (2023). Measuring Touch Sensitivity in an Aging Population. In: Holmes, N.P. (eds) Somatosensory Research Methods. Neuromethods, vol 196. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3068-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3068-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3067-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3068-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics