Skip to main content

Visual Function Tests: Visual Fields

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Retinitis Pigmentosa

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2560))

  • 1061 Accesses

Abstract

Visual field tests, also known as perimetry tests, are used to assess progression of ophthalmic diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa (RP) by monitoring changes in a patient’s visual field (VF). VF loss corresponds to damage at any point in the visual pathway, including the retina, such as in RP. Damage to different parts of this pathway corresponds to characteristic VF defects. Perimetry tests are subjective, as they are functional tests that help physicians identify abnormal fields as well as quantitatively assess VF sensitivity. The results may also be informative of a patient’s visual function crucial for performing day-to-day activities. Automated perimetry tests are among the most commonly used, with the most common being automated static perimetry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Liu G, Liu X, Li H et al (2016) Optical coherence tomographic analysis of retina in retinitis pigmentosa patients. Ophthalmic Res 56(3):111–122. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vamos R, Tatrai E, Nemeth J et al (2011) The structure and function of the macula in patients with advanced retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(11):8425–8432. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-7780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Broadway DC (2012) Visual field testing for glaucoma - a practical guide. Community Eye Health 25(79–80):66–70

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spector R (1990) Chapter 116 Visual fields. In: Clinical methods: the history, physical, and laboratory examinations, 3rd edn. Butterworths, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hood DC, Raza AS, de Moraes CG et al (2013) Glaucomatous damage of the macula. Prog Retin Eye Res 32:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Moraes CG, Sun A, Jarukasetphon R et al (2019) Association of macular visual field measurements with glaucoma staging systems. JAMA Ophthalmol 137(2):139–145. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.5398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boyd K (2016) Have AMD? Save your sight with an Amsler grid. https://www.aao.org/eye-health/tips-prevention/facts-about-amsler-grid-daily-vision-test

  8. Sample PA, Dannheim F, Artes PH et al (2011) Imaging and Perimetry Society standards and guidelines. Optom Vis Sci 88(1):4–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181fc3735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carroll JN, Johnson CA (2013) Visual field testing: from one medical student to another. http://EyeRounds.org/tutorials/VF-testing/

  10. Yaqub M (2012) Visual fields interpretation in glaucoma: a focus on static automated perimetry. Community Eye Health 25(79–80):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  11. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Automated static perimetry. https://www.aao.org/bcscsnippetdetail.aspx?id=7d681413-674c-4f69-a630-12ee8d82da35

  12. Humphrey Field Analyzer (2010) Humphrey Field Analyzer II-i series User Manual

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bengtsson B, Heijl A, Olsson J (1998) Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76(2):165–169. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760208.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Katz J, Sommer A, Witt K (1991) Reliability of visual field results over repeated testing. Ophthalmology 98(1):70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32339-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kunimatsu S, Suzuki Y, Shirato S et al (2000) Usefulness of gaze tracking during perimetry in glaucomatous eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44(2):190–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishiyama Y, Murata H, Asaoka R (2015) The usefulness of gaze tracking as an index of visual field reliability in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56(11):6233–6236. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-17661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Macular Edema (2019) National Institutes of Health. https://www.nei.nih.gov/learn-about-eye-health/eye-conditions-and-diseases/macular-edema

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Chang, A.Y. (2023). Visual Function Tests: Visual Fields. In: Tsang, S.H., Quinn, P.M. (eds) Retinitis Pigmentosa. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2560. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2651-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2651-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2650-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2651-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics