Abstract
The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a complex network with multiple functions during tissue regeneration. Precisely, the properties of ECM have been thoroughly used in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research, aiming to restore the function of damaged or dysfunctional tissues. One of the most promising techniques for tissue and organ regeneration is decellularization, in which the ECM is isolated from its native tissues in order to produce a natural scaffold. The ECM ideally retains its inherent structural, biochemical, and biomechanical cues and can be decellularized to produce a functional tissue or organ. While decellularization can be accomplished using chemical and enzymatic, physical, or a combination of these methods, each strategy has its benefits and drawbacks. A biological scaffold from ECM can be produced by a variety of decellularization methods whose caveat consists in efficiently eliminating cells from the treated tissue. Preservation of the ECM matrix ultrastructure is highly desirable because of its unique architecture, contained growth factors, and decreased immunological response. All of these properties provide attachment sites and adequate environment for the cells colonizing this scaffold, reconstituting the decellularized organ. Tissue decellularization is gaining momentum as a technique to obtain potentially implantable decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) with well-preserved key components. The chapter briefly describes different decellularization methods, evaluates these protocols, and compares the advantages and disadvantages of these methods in terms of their ability to retain desired ECM characteristics for particular tissues and organs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ratner BD (2006) Biomaterials tutorial: an introduction to biomaterials. University of Washington Engineered Biomaterials http://www.uweb.engr.washington.edu/research/tutorials/introbiomat.html. Accessed on 5th June 2007
Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE (1996) Biomaterials science: An introduction to materials in medicine. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–10, 84–94
Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullius B, Simmons-Byrd A, Morff R (2002) Morphologic study of small intestinal submucosa as a body wall repair device. J Surg Res 103(2):190–202
Angell DL, Angell WW (1976) Heart valve stent. USA patent 3983581
Dewanjee MR (1988) Mayo Foundation, assignee. Treatment of Collagenous Tissue with Glutaraldehyde and Aminodiphosphoate Calcification Inhibitor USA patent 4553974
Liotta DS, Ferrari HM, Pisanu AJ, Donato FO (1978) Low profile glutaraldehyde-fixed porcine aortic prosthetic device USA patent 4079468
van der Rest M, Garrone R (1991) Collagen family of proteins. FASEB J 5(13):2814–2823
Badylak SF (2002) The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Semin Cell Dev Biol 13(5):377–383
Klein B, Schiffer R, Hafemann B, Klosterhalfen B, Zwadlo-Klarwasser G (2001) Inflammatory response to a porcine membrane composed of fibrous collagen and elastin as dermal substitute. J Mater Sci Mater Med 12(5):419–424
Zhang MH, Chen J, Kirilak Y, Willers C, Xu J, Wood D (2005) Porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) is not an acellular collagenous matrix and contains porcine DNA: possible implications in human implantation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 73(1):61–67
Dzemeshkevich SL, Konstantinov BA, Gromova GV, Lyudinovskova RA, Kudrina LL (1994) The mitral valve replacement by the new-type bioprostheses (features of design and long-term results). J Cardiovasc Surg 35(6 Suppl 1):189–191
Allman AJ, McPherson TB, Badylak SF, Merrill LC, Kallakury B, Sheehan C, Raeder RH, Folk JE (1980) Transglutaminases. Annu Rev Biochem 49:517–531
Patino MG, Neiders ME, Andreana S, Noble B, Cohen RE (2003) Cellular inflammatory response to porcine collagen membranes. J Periodontal Res 38(5):458–464
Konstantinovic ML, Lagae P, Zheng F, Verbeken EK, De Ridder D, Deprest JA (2005) Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in a rat model. BJOG 112(11):1554–1560
O’Neill P, Booth AE (1984) Use of porcine dermis as a dural substitute in 72 patients. J Neurosurg 61(2):351–354
Gilbert TW, Sellaroa TL, Badylak SF (2006) Decellularization of tissues and organs. Biomaterials 27:3675–3683
Syed O, Walters NJ, Day RM, Kim HW, Knowles JC (2014) Evaluation of decellularization protocols for production of tubular small intestine submucosa scaffolds for use in oesophageal tissue engineering. Acta Biomaterialia 10(12):5043–5054
O’Neill JD, Anfang R, Anandappa A (2013) Decellularization of human and porcine lung tissues for pulmonary tissue engineering. Ann Thorac Surg 96(3):1046–1055
Zhou J, Fritze O, Schleicher M (2010) Impact of heart valve decellularization on 3-D ultrastructure, immunogenicity and thrombogenicity. Biomaterials 31(9):2549–2554
Meezan E, Hjelle JT, Brendel K, Carlson EC (1975) A simple, versatile, nondisruptive method for the isolation of morphologically and chemically pure basement membranes from several tissues. Life Sci 17(11):1721–1732
Partington L, Mordan NJ, Mason C (2013) Biochemical changes caused by decellularization may compromise mechanical integrity of tracheal scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia 9(2):5251–5261
Aghsoudlou P, Totonelli G, Loukogeorgakis SP, Eaton S, De Coppi P (2013) A decellularization methodology for the production of a natural acellular intestinal matrix. J Visual Exp 80:50658
Sullivan DC, Mirmalek-Sani SH, Deegan DB (2012) Decellularization methods of porcine kidneys for whole organ engineering using a high-throughput system. Biomaterials 33(31):7756–7764
Mendoza-Novelo B, Avila EE, Cauich-RodrÃguez JV (2011) Decellularization of pericardial tissue and its impact on tensile viscoelasticity and glycosaminoglycan content. ActaBiomaterialia 7(3):1241–1248
Gilpin SE, Guyette JP, Gonzalez G (2014) Perfusion decellularization of human and porcine lungs: bringing the matrix to clinical scale. J Heart Lung Transplant 33(3):298–308
Petersen TH, Calle EA, Colehour MB, Niklason LE (2012) Matrix composition and mechanics of decellularized lung scaffolds. Cells Tissues Organs 195(3):222–231
Gilbert TW, Wognum S, Joyce EM, Freytes DO, Sacks MS, Badylak SF (2008) Collagen fiber alignment and biaxial mechanical behavior of porcine urinary bladder derived extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 29(36):4775–4782
Schenke-Layland K, Vasilevski O, Opitz F (2003) Impact of decellularization of xenogeneic tissue on extracellular matrix integrity for tissue engineering of heart valves. J Structural Biol 143(3):201–208
Funamoto S, Nam K, Kimura T (2010) The use of high-hydrostatic pressure treatment to decellularize blood vessels. Biomaterials 31(13):3590–3595
Hashimoto Y, Funamoto S, Sasaki S (2010) Preparation and characterization of decellularized cornea using high-hydrostatic pressurization for corneal tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31(14):3941–3948
Sawada K, Terada D, Yamaoka T, Kitamura S, Fujisato T (2008) Cell removal with supercritical carbon dioxide for acellular artificial tissue. J Chem Tech Biotech 83(6):943–949
Xing Q, Yates K, Tahtinen M, Shearier E, Qian Z, Zhao F (2015) Decellularization of fibroblast cell sheets for natural extracellular matrix scaffold preparation. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 21(1):77–87
Elder BD, Kim DH, Athanasiou KA (2010) Developing an articular cartilage decellularization process toward facet joint cartilage replacement. Neurosurgery 66(4):722–727
Uygun BE, Soto-Gutierrez A, Yagi H (2010) Organ reengineering through development of a transplantable recellularized liver graft using decellularized liver matrix. Nature Med 16(7):814–820
Friedrich LH, Jungebluth P, Sjöqvist S (2014) Preservation of aortic root architecture and properties using a detergent-enzymatic perfusion protocol. Biomaterials 35(6):1907–1913
Baiguera S, Del Gaudio C, Kuevda E, Gonfiotti A, Bianco A, Macchiarini P (2014) Dynamic decellularization and cross-linking of rat tracheal matrix. Biomaterials 35(24):6344–6350
Jank BJ, Xiong L, Moser PT (2015) Engineered composite tissue as a bioartificial limb graft. Biomaterials 61:246–256
Guyette JP, Charest JM, Mills RW (2016) Bioengineering human myocardium on native extracellular matrix. Circulation Res 118(1):56–72
Baptista MP, Siddiqui MM, Lozier G, Rodriguez SR, Atala A, Soker S (2011) The use of whole organ decellularization for the generation of a vascularized liver organoid. Hepatology 53(2):604–617
Ott CH, Mathiesen TS, Goh SK, Black LD, Kren SM, Netoff TI, Taylor D (2007) Perfusion-decellularized matrix: using nature’s platform to engineer a bioartificial heart. Nat Med 14(2):213–221
Wang L, Johnson JA, Chang DW, Zhang Q (2013) Decellularized musculofascial extracellular matrix for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 34(11):2641–2654
Grauss RW, Hazekamp MG, Oppenhuizen F, Munsteren CJ, Gitenberger-de Groot AC, DeRuiter MC (2005) Histological evaluation of decellularised porcine aortic valves: matrix changes due to different decellularisation methods. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27(4):566–578
Crapo P, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF (2011) An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials 32(12):3233–3243
Cartmell JS, Dunn MG (2000) Effect of chemical treatment on tendon cellularity and mechanical properties. J Biomed Mater Res 49:134–140
Rieder E, Kasimir MT, Silberhumer G (2004) Decellularization protocols of porcine heart valves differ importantly in efficiency of cell removal and susceptibility of the matrix to recellularization with human vascular cells. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127(2):399–405
Böer U, Lohrenz A, Klingenberg M, Pich A, Haverich A, Wilhelmi M (2011) The effect of detergent-based decellularization procedures on cellular proteins and immunogenicity in equine carotid artery grafts. Biomaterials 32(36):9730–9737
Giraldo-Gomez DM, Leon-Mancilla B, Del Prado-Audelo ML (2016) Trypsin as enhancement in cyclical tracheal decellularization: morphological and biophysical characterization. Materials Sci Eng C 59:930–937
Mendes RL, Nobre BP, Cardoso MT, Pereira AP, Palavra AF (2003) Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of compounds with pharmaceutical importance from microalgae. Inorganica Chimica Acta 356:328–334
Kim SA, Kim OY, Rhee MS (2010) Direct application of supercritical carbon dioxide for the reduction of Cronobacter spp. (Enterobacter sakazakii) in end products of dehydrated powdered infant formula. J Dairy Sci 93(5):1854–1860
Jung WY, Choi YM, Rhee MS (2009) Potential use of supercritical carbon dioxide to decontaminate Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella typhimurium in alfalfa sprouted seeds. Int J Food Microbio 136(1):66–70
Schmidt CE, Baier JM (2000) Acellular vascular tissues: natural biomaterials for tissue repair and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 21(22):2215–2231
Malone JM, Brendel K, Duhamil RC, Reinert RL (1984) Detergent- extracted small diameter vascular prostheses. J Vasc Surg 1:181–191
Coito AJ, Kupiec-Weglinsky JW (1996) Extracellular matrix protein by standers or active participants in the allograft rejection cascade? Ann Transplant 1:14–18
Schechter I (1975) Prolonged retention of glutaraldehyde-treated skin allografts and xenografts: immunological and histological studies. Ann Surg 182(6):699–704
Gulati AK, Cole GP (1994) Immunogenicity and regenerative potential of acellular nerve allograft to repair peripheral nerve in rats and rabbits. Acta Neurochir Wein 126:158–164
Yoganathan AP (1995) Cardiac valve prosthesis. In: Bronzino JD (ed) The biomedical engineering hand book. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1847–1870
Kropp BP, Cheng EY, Lin HK, Zhang Y (2004) Reliable and reproducible bladder regeneration using unseeded distal small intestinal submucosa. J Urol Suppl 172(4):1710–1771
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Kumar, N. et al. (2022). Naturally Derived Biomaterials: An Overview. In: Kumar, N., Kumar, V., Shrivastava, S., Gangwar, A.K., Saxena, S. (eds) Tissue Scaffolds. Springer Protocols Handbooks. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2425-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2425-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2424-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2425-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols