Abstract
The ability to engineer bacterial genomes in an efficient way is crucial for many bio-related technologies. Single-stranded (ss) DNA recombineering technology allows to introduce mutations within bacterial genomes in a very simple and straightforward way. This technology was initially developed for E. coli but was later extended to other organisms of interest, including the environmentally and metabolically versatile Pseudomonas putida. The technology is based on three pillars: (1) adoption of a phage recombinase that works effectively in the target strain, (2) ease of introduction of short ssDNA oligonucleotide that carries the mutation into the bacterial cells at stake and (3) momentary suppression of the endogenous mismatch repair (MMR) through transient expression of a dominant negative mutL allele. In this way, the recombinase protects the ssDNA and stimulates recombination, while MutLE36KPP temporarily inhibits the endogenous MMR system, thereby allowing the introduction of virtually any possible type of genomic edits. In this chapter, a protocol is detailed for easily performing recombineering experiments aimed at entering single and multiple changes in the chromosome of P. putida. This was made by implementing the workflow named High-Efficiency Multi-site genomic Editing (HEMSE), which delivers simultaneous mutations with a simple and effective protocol.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rogers JK, Church GM (2016) Multiplexed engineering in biology. Trends Biotechnol 34(3):198–206
Esvelt KM, Wang HH (2013) Genome-scale engineering for systems and synthetic biology. Mol Syst Biol 9:641
Martínez-García E, de Lorenzo V (2012) Transposon-based and plasmid-based genetic tools for editing genomes of Gram-negative bacteria. Methods Mol Biol 813:267–283
Hmelo LR, Borlee BR, Almblad H et al (2015) Precision-engineering the Pseudomonas aeruginosa genome with two-step allelic exchange. Nat Protoc 10(11):1820–1841
Ellis HM, Yu D, DiTizio T et al (2001) High efficiency mutagenesis, repair, and engineering of chromosomal DNA using single-stranded oligonucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(12):6742–6746
van Kessel JC, Hatfull GF (2007) Recombineering in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Methods 4(2):147–152
Bao Z, Cartinhour S, Swingle B (2012) Substrate and target sequence length influence RecTE(Psy) recombineering efficiency in Pseudomonas syringae. PLoS One 7(11):e50617
Binder S, Siedler S, Marienhagen J et al (2013) Recombineering in Corynebacterium glutamicum combined with optical nanosensors: a general strategy for fast producer strain generation. Nucleic Acids Res 41(12):6360–6369
Wang HH, Isaacs FJ, Carr PA et al (2009) Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution. Nature 460(7257):894–898
Nyerges A, Csorgo B, Draskovits G et al (2018) Directed evolution of multiple genomic loci allows the prediction of antibiotic resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115(25):E5726–E5735
Isaacs FJ, Carr PA, Wang HH et al (2011) Precise manipulation of chromosomes in vivo enables genome-wide codon replacement. Science 333(6040):348–353
Wang HH, Huang PY, Xu G et al (2012) Multiplexed in vivo His-tagging of enzyme pathways for in vitro single-pot multienzyme catalysis. ACS Synth Biol 1(2):43–52
Wang HH, Kim H, Cong L et al (2012) Genome-scale promoter engineering by coselection MAGE. Nat Methods 9(6):591–593
Bonde MT, Kosuri S, Genee HJ et al (2015) Direct mutagenesis of thousands of genomic targets using microarray-derived oligonucleotides. ACS Synth Biol 4(1):17–22
Kampers LFC, Volkers RJM, Martins Dos Santos VAP (2019) Pseudomonas putida KT2440 is HV1 certified, not GRAS. Microb Biotechnol 12(5):845–848
Nikel PI, Martinez-Garcia E, de Lorenzo V (2014) Biotechnological domestication of pseudomonads using synthetic biology. Nat Rev Microbiol 12(5):368–379
Nikel PI, Chavarria M, Danchin A et al (2016) From dirt to industrial applications: Pseudomonas putida as a synthetic biology chassis for hosting harsh biochemical reactions. Curr Opin Chem Biol 34:20–29
Nikel PI, de Lorenzo V (2018) Pseudomonas putida as a functional chassis for industrial biocatalysis: from native biochemistry to trans-metabolism. Metab Eng 50:142–155
Loeschcke A, Thies S (2015) Pseudomonas putida—a versatile host for the production of natural products. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99(15):6197–6214
Poblete-Castro I, Becker J, Dohnt K et al (2012) Industrial biotechnology of Pseudomonas putida and related species. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93(6):2279–2290
Nikel PI, Chavarría M, Fuhrer T et al (2015) Pseudomonas putida KT2440 strain metabolizes glucose through a cycle formed by enzymes of the entner-doudoroff, Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas, and pentose phosphate pathways. J Biol Chem 290(43):25920–25932
Aparicio T, Jensen SI, Nielsen AT et al (2016) The Ssr protein (T1E_1405) from Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E enables oligonucleotide-based recombineering in platform strain P. putida EM42. Biotechnol J 11(10):1309–1319
Ricaurte DE, Martinez-Garcia E, Nyerges A et al (2018) A standardized workflow for surveying recombinases expands bacterial genome-editing capabilities. Microb Biotechnol 11(1):176–188
Aparicio T, de Lorenzo V, Martinez-Garcia E (2019) Improved thermotolerance of genome-reduced Pseudomonas putida EM42 enables effective functioning of the PL/cI857 system. Biotechnol J 14(1):e1800483
Aparicio T, Nyerges A, Nagy I et al (2020) Mismatch repair hierarchy of Pseudomonas putida revealed by mutagenic ssDNA recombineering of the pyrF gene. Environ Microbiol 22(1):45–58
Aparicio T, Nyerges A, Martínez-García E et al (2020) High-efficiency multi-site genomic editing of Pseudomonas putida through thermoinducible ssDNA Recombineering. iScience 23(3):100946
Martinez-Garcia E, Nikel PI, Aparicio T et al (2014) Pseudomonas 2.0: genetic upgrading of P. putida KT2440 as an enhanced host for heterologous gene expression. Microb Cell Factories 13:159
Manoil C, Beckwith J (1985) TnphoA: a transposon probe for protein export signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82(23):8129–8133
Boyer HW, Roulland-Dussoix D (1969) A complementation analysis of the restriction and modification of DNA in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 41(3):459–472
Kessler B, de Lorenzo V, Timmis KN (1992) A general system to integrate lacZ fusions into the chromosomes of gram-negative eubacteria: regulation of the Pm promoter of the TOL plasmid studied with all controlling elements in monocopy. Mol Gen Genet 233(1–2):293–301
Martínez-García E, Goñi-Moreno A, Bartley B et al (2019) SEVA 3.0: an update of the Standard European Vector Architecture for enabling portability of genetic constructs among diverse bacterial hosts. Nucleic Acids Res 48(D1):D1164–D1170
Yee TW, Smith DW (1990) Pseudomonas chromosomal replication origins: a bacterial class distinct from Escherichia coli-type origins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87(4):1278–1282
Wolanski M, Donczew R, Zawilak-Pawlik A et al (2014) oriC-encoded instructions for the initiation of bacterial chromosome replication. Front Microbiol 5:735
Carnoy C, Roten CA (2009) The dif/Xer recombination systems in proteobacteria. PLoS One 4(9):e6531
Zuker M (2003) Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 31(13):3406–3415
Aparicio T, de Lorenzo V, Martínez-García E (2020) A broad host range plasmid-based roadmap for ssDNA-based recombineering in Gram-Negative bacteria. In: de la Cruz F (ed) Horizontal gene transfer: methods and protocols. Springer, New York, NY, pp 383–398
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the SETH (RTI2018-095584-B-C42) (MINECO/FEDER), SyCoLiM (ERA-COBIOTECH 2018—PCI2019-111859-2) Projects of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, The MADONNA (H2020-FET-OPEN-RIA-2017-1-766975), SynBio4Flav (H2020-NMBP-TR-IND/H2020-NMBP-BIO-2018-814650) and MIX-UP (MIX-UP H2020-BIO-CN-2019-870294) Contracts of the European Union and the InGEMICS-CM (S2017/BMD-3691) and BIOSINT-CM (Y2020/TCS-6555) Projects of the Comunidad de Madrid—European Structural and Investment Funds—(FSE, FECER). The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. The bacterial strains and plasmids described are available upon request.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Aparicio, T., de Lorenzo, V., Martínez-García, E. (2022). High-Efficiency Multi-site Genomic Editing (HEMSE) Made Easy. In: Reisch, C.R. (eds) Recombineering. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2479. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2233-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2233-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2232-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2233-9
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols