Abstract
Conceived as a general introduction to the book, this chapter is a reminder of the core concepts of genetic mapping and molecular marker-based prediction. It provides an overview of the principles and the evolution of methods for mapping the variation of complex traits, and methods for QTL-based prediction of human disease risk and animal and plant breeding value. The principles of linkage-based and linkage disequilibrium–based QTL mapping methods are described in the context of the simplest, single-marker, methods. Methodological evolutions are analysed in relation with their ability to account for the complexity of the genotype–phenotype relations. Main characteristics of the genetic architecture of complex traits, drawn from QTL mapping works using large populations of unrelated individuals, are presented. Methods combining marker–QTL association data into polygenic risk score that captures part of an individual’s susceptibility to complex diseases are reviewed. Principles of best linear mixed model-based prediction of breeding value in animal- and plant-breeding programs using phenotypic and pedigree data, are summarized and methods for moving from BLUP to marker–QTL BLUP are presented. Factors influencing the additional genetic progress achieved by using molecular data and rules for their optimization are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- AUC:
-
Area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves
- BLUE:
-
Best linear unbiased estimate
- BLUP:
-
Best linear unbiased prediction
- BV:
-
Breeding value
- CIM:
-
Composite interval mapping
- EM:
-
Expectation maximization
- G × E:
-
Genotype by environment
- GWAS :
-
Genome-wide association study
- IBD:
-
Identity by descent
- IM:
-
Interval mapping
- Lasso:
-
Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator
- LD:
-
Linkage disequilibrium
- LE:
-
Linkage equilibrium
- LR:
-
Linear regression
- MAF :
-
Minor allele frequency
- MAS :
-
Marker assisted selection
- MIM:
-
Multiple interval mapping
- ML:
-
Maximum Likelihood
- MLM:
-
Mixed linear model
- QTL:
-
Quantitative trait loci
- RR:
-
Ridge regression
- SM:
-
Single marker
- SNP:
-
Single nucleotide polymorphism
References
Lander ES, Schork NJ (1994) Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 265:2037–2048
Galton F (1877) Typical laws of heredity. Nature 15:492–495, 512–514, 532–533
Fisher RA (1918) The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Proc Royal Soc Edinburgh 52:399–433
Henderson CR (1953) Estimation of variance and covariance components. Biometrics 9:226–252
Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Cambridge University Press, p 980
Sax K (1923) The association of size differences with seed-coat pattern and pigmentation in Phaseolus vulgaris. Genetics 8:552
Morgan TH, Sturtevant AH, Muller HJ, Bridges CB (1915) The mechanism of Mendelian heredity. Henry Holt, New York
Morton NE (1955) Sequential tests for the detection of linkage. Am J Hum Genet 20:277–318
Botstein D, Whit RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32:314–331
Rendel J (1961) Relationships between blood groups and the fat percentage of the milk in cattle. Nature 189:408–409
Tanksley SD, Medina-Filho R, Rick DM (1982) Use of naturally-occurring enzyme variation to detect and map genes controlling quantitative traits in an interspecific backcross of tomato. Heredity 49:11
Kahler AL, Wherhahn CF (1986) Associations between quantitative traits and enzyme loci in the F2 population of a maize hybrid. Theor Appl Genet 72:15
Paterson AH, Lander ES, Hewiit JD, Peterson S et al (1988) Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete RFLP linkage map. Nature 335:721–726
Cardon LR, Smith SD, Fulker DW, Kimberling WJ et al (1994) Quantitative trait locus for reading disability on chromosome 6. Science 266(5183):276–279
Peleman JD, van der Voort JR (2003) Breeding by design. Trends Plant Sci 8(7):330–334
van Arendonk JAM, Tied B, Kinghorn BP (1994) Use of multiple genetic markers in prediction of breeding values. Genetics 137:319–329
MacArthur J, Bowler E, Cerezo M, Gil L et al (2017) The new NHGRI-EBI catalog of published genome-wide association studies. Nucleic Acids Res 45(1):896–901
De los Campos G, Sorensen D, Gianola D (2015) Genomic heritability: what is it? PLoS Genet 11:e1005048
Miedaner T, Galiano-Carneiro Boeven AL, Gaikpa DS, Kistner MB, Grote CP (2020) Genomics-assisted breeding for quantitative disease resistances in small-grain cereals and maize. Int J Mol Sci 21:9717
Meuwissen TH, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819–1829
Lander ES, Kruglyak L (1995) Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet 11:241–247
Bohra A, Pandey MK, Jha UC, Singh B et al (2014) · genomics-assisted breeding in four major pulse crops of developing countries: present status and prospects. Theor Appl Genet 127:1263–1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-014-2301-3
Van Ooijen J, Jansen J (2013) Genetic mapping in experimental populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 155
Soller M (1990) Genetic mapping of the bovine genome using deoxyribonucleic acid-level markers to identify loci affecting quantitative traits of economic importance. Dairy Sci 73:2628–2646
Fulker DW, Cardon LR (1994) A sib-pair approach to interval mapping of quantitative trait loci. Am J Hum Genet 54:1092–1103
Zhang Q, Boichard D, Hoeschele I, Ernst C et al (1998) Mapping quantitative trait loci for milk production and health of dairy cattle in a large outbred pedigree. Genetics 149(4):1959–1973
Kissebah AH, Sonnenberg GE, Myklebust J, Goldstein M et al (2000) Quantitative trait loci on chromosomes 3 and 17 influence phenotypes of the metabolic syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(26):14478–14483
Knott SA, Elsen JM, Haley CS (1996) Multiple marker mapping of quantitative trait loci in half-sib populations. Theor Appl Genet 93:71–80
Uimari P, Zhan Q, Grignolia FG, Hoeschelaned I, Thaller G (1996) Granddaughter design data using least-squares, residual maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods for QTL analysis. J Agri Genomics 2:1–20
Chuechill G, Doerge R (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138(3):963–971
Lander ES, Botstein D (1989) Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121:185–199
Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). J R Stat Soc 39:1–38
Haley CS, Knott SA (1992) A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity 69:315–324
Sen S, Churchill GA (2001) A statistical framework for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 159:371–387
Jansen RC (1993) Interval mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Genetics 135:205–211
Zeng ZB (1993) Theoretical basis for separation of multiple linked gene effects in mapping quantitative trait loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:10972–10976
Zeng ZB (1994) Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136:1457–1468
Kao CH, Zeng ZB, Teasdale RD (1999) Multiple interval mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics 152:1203–1216
Carlborg O, Andersson L, Kinghorn B (2000) The use of a genetic algorithm for simultaneous mapping of multiple interacting quantitative trait loci. Genetics 155:2003–2010
Baierl A, Bogdan M, Frommlet F, Futschik A (2006) On locating multiple interacting quantitative trait loci in intercross designs. Genetics 173:1693–1703
Grignola FE, Zhang Q, Hoeschele I (1997) Mapping linked quantitative trait loci via residual maximum likelihood. Genet Sel Evol 29:529–544
Thomas C, Cortessis V (1992) A Gibbs sampling approach to linkage analysis. Hum Hered 42:63–76
Hoeschele I, VanRaden P (1993) Bayesian analysis of linkage between genetic markers and quantitative trait loci. II. Combining prior knowledge with experimental evidence. Theor Appl Genet 85:946–952
Satagopan JM, Yandell BS, Newton MA, Osborn TC (1996) Markov chain Monte Carlo approach to detect polygene loci for complex traits. Genetics 144:805–816
Banerjee S, Yandell BS, Yi NJ (2008) Bayesian quantitative trait loci mapping for multiple traits. Genetics 179:2275–2289
Haley CS, Knott SA, Elsen JM (1994) Mapping quantitative trait loci in crosses between outbred lines using least squares. Genetics 136:1195–1207
Chen M, Kendziorski C (2007) A statistical framework for expression quantitative trait loci mapping. Genetics 117:761–771
Bedo J, Wenzl P, Kowalczyk A, Kilian A (2008) Precision-mapping and statistical validation of quantitative trait loci by machine learning. BMC Genet 9:35
Guyon I (2003) An introduction to variable and feature selection. J Mach Learn Res 3:1156–1182
Jannink JL, Jansen RC (2001) Mapping epistatic quantitative trait loci with one-dimensional genome searches. Genetics 157:445–454
Zhang YM, Xu S (2005) A penalized maximum likelihood method for estimating epistatic effects of QTL. Heredity 95:96–104
Manichaikul A, Moon JY, Sen S, Yandell BS, Broman KW (2009) A model selection approach for the identification of quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses, allowing epistasis. Genetics 181:1077–1086
Wang DL, Zhu J, Li ZKL, Paterson AH (1999) Mapping QTLs with epistatic effects and QTL × environment interactions by mixed linear model approaches. Theor Appl Genet 99:1255–1264
Knott SA, Haley CS (2000) Multitrait least squares for quantitative trait loci detection. Genetics 156:899–911
Jiang C, Zeng ZB (1995) Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics 140:1111–1127
Lange C, Whittaker JC (2001) Mapping quantitative trait loci using generalized estimating equations. Genetics 159:1325–1337
Weller JI, Wiggans GR, Vanraden PM, Ron M (1996) Application of a canonical transformation to detection of quantitative trait loci with the aid of genetic markers in a multitrait experiment. Theor Appl Genet 92:998–1002
Liu J, Liu Y, Liu X, Deng HW (2007) Bayesian mapping of quantitative trait loci for multiple complex traits with the use of variance components. Am J Hum Genet 81:304–320
Goffinet B, Gerber S (2000) Quantitative trait loci: a meta-analysis. Genetics 155:463–473
Veyrieras JB, Goffinet B, Charcosset A (2007) MetaQTL: a package of new computational methods for the meta-analysis of QTL mapping experiments. BMC Bioinformatics 8(49):1–16
Rebai A, Goffinet B (2000) More about quantitative trait locus mapping with diallel designs. Genet Res 75:243–247
Demarest K, Koyner J, McCaughran J, Cipp L, Hitzzeman R (2001) Further characterisation and high-resolution mapping of quantitative trait loci for ethanol induced locomotor activity. Behave Genet 31:79–91
Cavanagh C, Morell M, Mackay I, Powel W (2008) From mutations to MAGIC: resources for gene discovery, validation and delivery in crop plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 1:215–221
Yu J, Holland JB, McMullen MD, Buckler ES (2008) Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics 178:539–551
Beavis WD (1998) QTL analyses: power, precision, and accuracy. In: Paterson AH (ed) Molecular dissection of complex traits. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 145–162
Hill WG, Robertson A (1968) Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theor Appl Genet 38:226–131
Balding D (2006) A tutorial on statistical methods for population association studies. Nat Rev Genet 7:781–791
Visscher PM, Wray NR, Zhang Q, Sklar P et al (2017) 10 years of GWAS discovery: biology, function, and translation. Am J Hum Genet 101:5–22
Hayes B (2014) Overview of Statistical methods for genome-wide association studies (GWAS). In: Gondro C, van der Werf J, Hayes B (eds) Genome-wide association Studies and genomic prediction. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 149–169
Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ (1993) Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet 52:506–516
Nejati-Javaremi A, Smith C, Gibson JP (1997) Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection. J Anim Sci 75:1738–1745
Devlin B, Bacanu SA, Roeder K (2004) Genomic control in the extreme. Nat Genet 36:1129–1130
Pritchard JK et al (2000) Association mapping in structured populations. Am J Hum Genet 67:170–181
Yu J, Pressoir G, Briggs WH, Bi IV et al (2006) A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat Genet 38:203–208
Kang HM, Zaitlen NA, Wade CM, Kirby A et al (2008) Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics 178:1709–1723
Zhang Z, Ersoz E, Lai C-Q, Todhunter RJ et al (2010) Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 42:355–360
Aulchenko YS, Koning DJ, Haley C (2007) Genome wide rapid association using mixed model and regression: a fast and simple method for genomewide pedigree-based quantitative trait loci association analysis. Genetics 177:577–585
Zhou X, Stephens M (2012) Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat Genet 44:821–824
Wen YJ, Zhang H, Ni YL, Huang B et al (2018) Methodological implementation of mixed linear models in multi-locus genome-wide association studies. Brief Bioinform 19(4):700–712
Fernando RA, Toosi A, Wolc D, Garrick N, Dekkers J (2017) Application of whole-genome prediction methods for genome-wide association studies: a Bayesian approach. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 22:172–193
Pan Q, Hu T, Moore JH (2014) Epistasis, complexity, and multifactor dimensionality reduction. In: Gondro C et al (eds) Genome-wide association studies and genomic prediction. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 465–478
Korte A, Vilhjálmsson BJ, Segura V, Platt P et al (2012) A mixed-model approach for genome-wide association studies of correlated traits in structured populations. Nat Genet 44:1066–1071
Zhu X, Stephens M (2017) Bayesian large-scale multiple regression with summary statistics from genome-wide association studies. Ann Appl Stat 11(3):1561–1592
Wang T, Zhou B, Guo T, Bidlingmaier M et al (2014) A robust method for genome-wide association meta-analysis with the application to circulating insulin-like growth factor I concentrations. Genet Epidemiol 38(2):162–171
Turley P, Walters RK, Maghzian O, Okbay A et al (2018) Multi-trait analysis of genome-wide association summary statistics using MTAG. Nat Genet 50(2):229–237
Cordell HJ (2009) Detecting gene–gene interactions that underlie human diseases. Nature Rev. Genet 10:393–404
Wu M, Ma S (2019) Robust genetic interaction analysis. Brief Bioinform 20(2):624–637
Cantor RM, Lange K, Sinsheimer JS (2010) Prioritizing GWAS results: a review of statistical methods and recommendations for their application. Am J Hum Genet 86:6–22
Qin X, Ma S, Wu M (2020) Gene-gene interaction analysis incorporating network information via a structured Bayesian approach. arXiv:2010.10960
Gayán J, González-Pérez A, Bermudo F, Sáez ME et al (2008) A method for detecting epistasis in genome-wide studies using case-control multi-locus association analysis. BMC Genomics 9:360
Han SS, Chatterjee N (2018) Review of statistical methods for gene-environment interaction analysis. Curr Epidemiol Rep 5:39–45
Ott J, Kamatani Y, Lathrop M (2011) Family-based designs for genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet 12:465–474
Meuwissen THE, Goddard ME (2000) Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using linkage disequilibria with closely linked marker loci. Genetics 155:421–430
Long AD, Mullaney SL, Reid LA, Fry JD et al (1995) High resolution mapping of genetic factors affecting abdominal bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139:1273–1291
Brut DW (2002) A comprehensive review on the analysis of QTL in animals. Trends Genet 18(9):488
Kearsey MJ, Farquhar AGL (1998) QTL analysis in plants; where are we now? Heredity 80:137–142
Hayes B, Goddard ME (2001) The distribution of the effects of genes affecting quantitative traits in livestock. Genet Sel Evol 33:209
Barton NH, Keightley PD (2002) Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nat Rev Genet 3:11–21
Hyne V, Kearsey MJ (1995) QTL analysis further uses of marker regression. Theor Appl Genet 91:471–476
Robertson A (1967) The nature of quantitative genetic variation. In: Brink RA, Styles ED (eds) Heritage from Mendel. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, pp 265–280
Flint J, Mackay TFC (2009) Genetic architecture of quantitative traits in mice, flies, and humans. Genome Res 19:723–733
Goddard ME, Kemper KE, MacLeod IM, Chamberlain AJ, Hayes BJ (2016) Genetics of complex traits: prediction of phenotype, identification of causal polymorphisms and genetic architecture. Proc R Soc B 283:20160569
Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S et al (2010) Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet 42:565–569
Yang J, Bakshi A, Zhu Z, Hemani G et al (2015) Genetic variance estimation with imputed variants finds negligible missing heritability for human height and body mass index. Nat Genet 47:1114–1120
Park JH, Wacholder S, Gail MH, Peters U et al (2010) Estimation of effect size distribution from genome-wide association studies and implications for future discoveries. Nat Genet 42:570–575
Simons YB, Turchin MC, Pritchard JK, Sella G (2014) The deleterious mutation load is insensitive to recent population history. Nat Genet 46:220–224
Makowsky R, Pajewski NM, Klimentidis YC, Vazquez AI et al (2011) Beyond missing heritability: prediction of complex traits. PLoS Genet 7(4):e1002051
Phillips PC (1998) The language of gene interaction. Genetics 149:1167–1171
Cheverud JM, Routman EJ (1995) Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components. Genetics 139:1455–1461
Mackay TFC (2001) The genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Ann Rev Genet 35:303–339
Nagel RL (2005) Epistasis and the genetics of human diseases. C R Biol 328:606–615
Jannink JL, Moreau L, Charmet G, Charcosset A (2008) Overview of QTL detection in plants and tests for synergistic epistatic interactions. Genitica 136(2):225–236
Albar L, Lorieux M, Ahmadi N, Rimbault I et al (1998) Genetic basis and mapping of the resistance to rice yellow mottle virus. I. QTLs identification and relationship between resistance and plant morphology. Theor Appl Genet 97:1145–1154
Pressoir G, Albar L, Ahmadi N, Rimbault I et al (1998) Genetic basis and mapping of the resistance to the rice yellow mottle virus. II. Evidence of a complementary epistasis between two QTLs. Theor Appl Genet 97:1155–1161
Ahmadi N, Albar L, Pressoir G, Pinel A et al (2001) Genetic basis and mapping of the resistance to Rice yellow mottle virus. III. Analysis of QTLs efficiency in introgressed progenies confirmed the hypothesis of complementary epistasis between two resistance QTLs. Theor Appl Genet 103:1084–1092
Yi N, Zinniel DK, Kim K, Eisen EJ et al (2006) Bayesian analyses of multiple epistatic QTL models for body weight and body composition in mice. Genet Res 87:45–60
Mackay TFC, Roshina NV, Leips JW, Pasyukova EG (2006) Complex genetic architecture of drosophila longevity. In: Masaro EJ, Austad SN (eds) Handbook of the biology of aging. Elsevier, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 181–216
Carlborg O, Hocking PM, Burt DW, Haley CS (2004) Simultaneous mapping of epistatic QTL in chickens reveals clusters of QTL pairs with similar genetic effects on growth. Genet Res 83:197–209
Grobe-Brinkhaus C, Jonas E, Buschbell H, Phatsara C et al (2010) Epistatic QTL pairs associated with meat quality and carcass composition traits in a porcine Duroc × Pietrain population. Genet Sel Evol 42:39
Carlborg O, Haley CS (2004) Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies? Nat Rev Genet 5:618–U614
Barendse W, Harrison BE, Hawken RJ, Ferguson DM (2007) Epistasis between Calpain-1 and its inhibitor Calpastatin within breeds of cattle. Genetics 176(4):2601–2610
Zhang J, Wei Z, Cardinale CJ, Gusareva LS et al (2019) Multiple epistasis interactions within MHC are associated with ulcerative colitis. Front Genet 10:257
Strange T, Ask B, Nielsen B (2013) Genetic parameters of the piglet mortality traits stillborn, weak at birth, starvation, crushing, and miscellaneous in crossbred pigs. J Anim Sci 91:1562–1569
Huang A, Xu S, Cai X (2014) Whole-genome quantitative trait locus mapping reveals major role of epistasis on yield of Rice. PLoS One 9:e87330
Mackay TFC (2014) Epistasis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene-gene interactions. Nat Rev Genet 15(1):22–33
de los Campos G, Sorensen DA, Toro MA (2019) Imperfect linkage disequilibrium generates phantom epistasis (& Perils of Big Data). G3 (Bethesda) 9:1429–1436
Burch CL, Chao L (2004) Epistasis and its relationship to canalization in the RNA virus 6. Genetics 167:559–567
Eitan Y, Soller M (2004) Selection induced genetic variation. In: Wasser SP (ed) Evolutionary theory and processes: modern horizons. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 153–176
Sonawane AR, Weiss ST, Glass K, Sharma A (2019) Network medicine in the age of biomedical big data. Front Genet 10:294
Amaral AJ, Bressan MC, Almeida J, Bettencourt C et al (2019) Combining genome-wide association analyses and gene interaction networks to reveal new genes associated with carcass traits, meat quality and fatty acid profiles in pigs. Livest Sci 220:180–189
Ko DK, Brandizzi F (2020) Network-based approaches for understanding gene regulation and function in plants. Plant J 104:302–317
Ebbert MTW, Ridge PG, Kauwe JSK (2015) Bridging the gap between statistical and biological epistasis in Alzheimer’s disease. Biomed Res Int 2015:870123. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/870123
Boyle EA, Li YI, Pritchard JK (2017) An expanded view of complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169:1177–1186
Field Y, Boyle EA, Telis N, Gao Z et al (2016) Detection of human adaptation during the past 2000 years. Science 354:760–764
Via S, Lande R (1987) Evolution of genetic variability in a spatially heterogeneous environment: effects of genotype-environment interaction. Genet Res 49:147–156
Bradshaw AD (1965) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv Genet 13:115–155
de Leon N, Jannink JL, Edwards JW, Kaeppler SM (2016) Introduction to a special issue on genotype by environment interaction. Crop Sci 56:2081–2089
Gauch HG, Zobel RW (1996) AMMI analysis of yield trials. In: Kang MS, Gauch HG (eds) Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 85–122
Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1996) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6:36–40
Stinchcombe JR, Function-valued Traits Work. Group, Kirkpatrick M (2012) Genetics and evolution of function-valued traits: understanding environmentally responsive phenotypes. Trends Ecol Evol 27:637–647
Robinson MR, Beckerman AP (2013) Quantifying multivariate plasticity: genetic variation in resource acquisition drives plasticity in resource allocation to components of life history. Ecol Lett 16:281–290
Jansen RC, Van Ooijen JM, Stam P, Lister C, Dean C (1995) Genotype-by-environment interaction in genetic mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Theor Appl Genet 91:33–37
Korol AB, Ronin YI, Ne E (1998) Approximate analysis of QTL-environment interaction with no limits on the number of environments. Genetics 148:2015–2028
Hayes BJ, Daetwyler HD, Goddard ME (2016) Models for genome x environment interaction: examples in livestock. Crop Sci 56(5):2251–2259
Valdar W, Solberg LC, Gauguier D, Cookson WO et al (2006b) Genetic and environmental effects on complex traits in mice. Genetics 174:959–984
Vieira C, Pasyukova EG, Zeng ZB, Hackett JB et al (2000) Genotype-environment interaction for quantitative trait loci affecting life span in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 154:213–227
El-Soda M, Malosetti M, Zwaan BJ, Koornneef M, Aarts MGM (2014) G × E interaction QTL mapping in plants: lessons from Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci 19(6):390–398
El-Soda M, Kruijer W, Malosetti M, Koornneef M, Aarts MGM (2015) Quantitative trait loci and candidate genes underlying genotype by environment interaction in the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to drought. Plant Cell Environ 38:585–599
MacMahon B (1968) Gene-environment interaction in human disease. J Psychiatr Res 6:393–402
Hunter DJ (2005) Gene-environment interaction in Humain diseases. Nat Rev Genet 6:287–298
Lillehammer M, Goddard ME, Nilsen H, Sehested E et al (2008) Quantitative trait locus-by-environment interaction for Milk yield traits on Bos taurus autosome 6. Genetics 179:1539–1546
Des Marais DL, Hernandez KM, Juenger TE (2013) Genotype-by-environment interaction and plasticity: exploring genomic responses of plants to the abiotic environment. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 44:5–29
Via S, Gomulkiewicz R, De Jong G, Scheiner SM et al (1995) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends Ecol Evol 10:212–217
Lacaze X, Hayes MP, Koro A (2009) Genetics of phenotypic plasticity: QTL analysis in barley, Hordeum vulgare. Heredity 102:163–173
Gutteling EW, Riksen JAG, Bakker J, Kammenga JE (2007) Mapping phenotypic plasticity and genotype-environment interactions affecting life-history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans. Heredity 98(1):28–37
Kikuchi S, Bheemanahalli R, Jagadish KSV, Kumagai E et al (2017) Genome-wide association mapping for phenotypic plasticity in rice. Plant Cell Environ 40(8):1565–1575
Lukens LE, Doebley J (1999) Epistatic and environmental interactions for quantitative trait loci involved in maize evolution. Genet Res 74:291–302
Liu N, Du Y, Warburton ML, Xiao Y, Yan J (2020) Phenotypic plasticity contributes to maize adaptation and Heterosis. Mol Biol Evol 38(4):1262–1275. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa283
Kawecki TJ, Ebert D (2004) Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Lett 7:1225–1241
Lowry DB, Lovell JT, Zhang L, Bonnette J et al (2019) QTL × environment interactions underlie adaptive divergence in switchgrass across a large latitudinal gradient. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116(26):12933–12941
Wickland DP, Hanzawa Y (2015) The flowering locus t/terminal flower 1 gene family: functional evolution and molecular mechanisms. Mol Plant 8(7):983–997
Dash S, Van Hemert J, Hong L, Wise RP, Dickerson JA (2012) PLEXdb: gene expression resources for plants and plant pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D1194–D1201
Coughlin SS, Trock B, Criqui MH, Pickle LW et al (1992) The logistic modeling of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a diagnostic test. J Clin Epidemiol 45(1):l–7
Brand A, Brand H, in den Bäumen TS (2008) The impact of genetics and genomics on public health. Eur J Hum Genet 16:5–13
Yang Q, Khoury MJ, Botto L, Friedman JM, Flanders WD (2003) Improving the prediction of complex diseases by testing for multiple disease-susceptibility genes. Am J Hum Genet 72:636–649
Dudbridge F (2013) Power and predictive accuracy of polygenic risk scores. PLoS Genet 9(3):e1003348
Mason SJ, Graham NE (2002) Areas beneath the relative operating characteristics (ROC) and relative operating levels (ROL) curves: statistical significance and interpretation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 128(584):2145–2166
Janssens ACJW, van Duijn CM (2009) Genome-based prediction of common diseases: Ethodological considerations for future research. Genome Med 1(2):20
Choi SW, Mak TS-H, O’Reilly PF (2020) Tutorial: a guide to performing polygenic risk score analyses. Nat Protoc 15:2759–2772
Dreyfuss JM, Levner D, Galagan GE, Church GM, Ramoni MF (2012) How accurate can genetic predictions be? BMC Genomics 13:340
Khera AV, Chaffin M, Aragam KG, Haas ME et al (2018) Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations. Nat Genet 50(9):1219–1224
Vilhjálmsson BJ, Yang J, Finucane HK (2015) Modelling linkage disequilibrium increases accuracy of polygenic risk scores. Am J Hum Genet 97:576–592
Hu Y, Lu Q, Powles R, Yao X et al (2017) Leveraging functional annotations in genetic risk prediction for human complex diseases. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005589
Hu Y, Lu Q, Liu W, Zhang Y et al (2017) Joint modeling of genetically correlated diseases and functional annotations increases accuracy of polygenic risk prediction. PLoS Genet 13:e1006836
Hazel LN (1943) The genetic basis for constructing selection indices. Genetics 38:476–490
Henderson CR (1949) Estimation of changes in herd environment. J Dairy Sci 32:709
Henderson CR (1975) Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31:423–447
Henderson CR (1976) A simple method for computing the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in predicting of breeding values. Biometrics 32:69–83
Mrode RA (2005) Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values. CAB Int:344
Piepho HP, Möhring J, Melchinger AE, Büchse A (2007) BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 161:209–228
Bernardo R (1996) Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Crop Sci 36(1):50–56
Fernando RL, Grossman M (1989) Marker-assisted selection using best linear unbiased prediction. Genet Sel Evol 21:467–477
Guimarães EP, Ruane J, Scherf BD, Sonnino A, Dargie JD (2007) Marker-assisted selection. Current status and future perspectives in crops, livestock, forestry and fish, Rome, ISBN 978-92-5-105717-9, p 471
Goddard ME (1992) A mixed model for the analyses of data on multiple genetic markers. Theor Appl Genet 83:878–886
Goddard ME, Hayes BJ (2002) Optimisation of response using molecular data. 7th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Montpellier, France, Communication no. 22–01
Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2003) Evaluation of marker assisted selection in pig enterprises. Livest Prod Sci 81(2–3):197–121
Boichard D, Fritz S, Rossignol MN, Guillaume F, et al. (2006) Implementation of marker-assisted selection: practical lessons from dairy cattle. 8th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
Hayes BJ, Chamberlain J, Mcpartlan H, Macleod I et al (2007) Accuracy of marker-assisted selection with single markers and marker haplotypes in cattle. Genet Res 89:215–220
Dekkers JCM, van Arendonk JAM (1998) Optimizing selection for quantitative traits with information on an identified locus in outbred populations. Genet Res 71:257–275
Hospital F, Charcosset A (1997) Marker-assisted introgression of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 147:1469–1485
Bouchez A, Hospital F, Causse M, Gallais A, Charcosset A (2002) Marker-assisted introgression of favorable alleles at quantitative trait loci between maize elite lines. Genetics 162:1945–1959
Peleman JD, van der Voort JR (2003) Breeding by design. Trends Plant Sci 7:330–334
van Berloo R, Stam P (1999) Comparison between marker-assisted selection and phenotypical selection in a set of Arabidopsis thaliana recombinant inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 98:113–118
Charmet G, Robert N, Perretant MR, Gay G et al (1999) Marker-assisted recurrent selection for cumulating additive and interactive QTL’s in recombinant inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 99:1143–1148
Ragot M, Lee M (2007) Marker-assisted selection in maize: current status, potential, limitations and perspectives from the private and public sectors. In: Guiamaraes et al (eds) Marker assisted selection. FAO, Rome, pp 117–150
Dekkers JCM, Hospital F (2002) The use of molecular genetics in the improvement of agricultural populations. Nat Rev Genet 3:22–32
Moreau L, Charcosset A, Hospital F, Gallais A (1998) Marker-assisted selection efficiency in populations of finite size. Genetics 148:1353–1365
Moreau L, Charcosset A, Gallais A (2004) Experimental evaluation of several cycles of marker-assisted selection in maize. Euphytica 137:111–118
Melchinger AE (1999) Genetic Diversity and Heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) Genetics and exploitation of Heterosis in crops. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA Books. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, pp 99–118
Bernardo R (1999) Marker-assisted best linear unbiased prediction of single cross performance. Crop Sci 39:1277–1282
Spelman RJ, Garrick DJ (1998) Genetic and economic responses for within-family marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes. J Dairy Sci 81:2942–2950
Ribaut JM, Hoisington D (1998) Marker-assisted selection: new tools and strategies. Trends Plant Sci 3:236–239
Jansen RC, Jannink J-L, Beavis WD (2003) Mapping quantitative trait loci in plant breeding populations: use of parental haplotype sharing. Crop Sci 43:829–834
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Ahmadi, N. (2022). Genetic Bases of Complex Traits: From Quantitative Trait Loci to Prediction. In: Ahmadi, N., Bartholomé, J. (eds) Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2467. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2205-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2205-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2204-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2205-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols