Abstract
Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is a rare bone or soft tissue tumor that occurs early in life and as such genetic variation is a major contributor to EwS risk. To date, genetic investigations have identified key somatic mutations and germline variants of importance for EwS risk. While substantial progress is being made in uncovering the genetic etiology of EwS, considerable gaps in knowledge remain. Herein, we provide a summary of methodological approaches for future genomic investigations of EwS. We anticipate this recommended analytical framework for germline and somatic investigations, along with genomic data from growing EwS case series, will aid in accelerating new genomic discoveries in EwS and expand knowledge of the genetic architecture of EwS.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Moore LE, Gold L, Stewart PA et al (2005) Parental occupational exposures and Ewing’s sarcoma. Int J Cancer 114:472–478
Valery PC, McWhirter W, Sleigh A et al (2002) Farm exposures, parental occupation, and risk of Ewing’s sarcoma in Australia: a national case-control study. Cancer Causes Control CCC 13:263–270
Grünewald TGP, Cidre-Aranaz F, Surdez D et al (2018) Ewing sarcoma. Nat Rev Dis Primer 4:5
Fraumeni JF, Glass AG (1970) Rarity of Ewing’s sarcoma among U.S. Negro children. Lancet Lond Engl 1:366–367
Jensen RD, Drake RM (1970) Rarity of Ewing’s tumour in Negroes. Lancet Lond Engl 1:777
Jawad MU, Cheung MC, Min ES et al (2009) Ewing sarcoma demonstrates racial disparities in incidence-related and sex-related differences in outcome: an analysis of 1631 cases from the SEER database, 1973–2005. Cancer 115:3526–3536
Joyce MJ, Harmon DC, Mankin HJ et al (1984) Ewing’s sarcoma in female siblings. A clinical report and review of the literature. Cancer 53:1959–1962
Rahman N (2014) Realizing the promise of cancer predisposition genes. Nature 505:302–308
Turc-Carel C, Aurias A, Mugneret F et al (1988) Chromosomes in Ewing’s sarcoma. I. An evaluation of 85 cases of remarkable consistency of t(11;22)(q24;q12). Cancer Genet Cytogenet 32:229–238
Delattre O, Zucman J, Plougastel B et al (1992) Gene fusion with an ETS DNA-binding domain caused by chromosome translocation in human tumours. Nature 359:162–165
Sankar S, Lessnick SL (2011) Promiscuous partnerships in Ewing’s sarcoma. Cancer Genet 204:351–365
Postel-Vinay S, Véron AS, Tirode F et al (2012) Common variants near TARDBP and EGR2 are associated with susceptibility to Ewing sarcoma. Nat Genet 44:323–327
Machiela MJ, Grünewald TGP, Surdez D et al (2018) Genome-wide association study identifies multiple new loci associated with Ewing sarcoma susceptibility. Nat Commun 9:3184
Grünewald TGP, Bernard V, Gilardi-Hebenstreit P et al (2015) Chimeric EWSR1-FLI1 regulates the Ewing sarcoma susceptibility gene EGR2 via a GGAA microsatellite. Nat Genet 47:1073–1078
Brohl AS, Patidar R, Turner CE et al (2017) Frequent inactivating germline mutations in DNA repair genes in patients with Ewing sarcoma. Genet Med Off J Am Coll Med Genet 19:955–958
Worch J, Cyrus J, Goldsby R et al (2011) Racial differences in the incidence of mesenchymal tumors associated with EWSR1 translocation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20:449–453
Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR (1977) DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74:5463–5467
Gangwal K, Sankar S, Hollenhorst PC et al (2008) Microsatellites as EWS/FLI response elements in Ewing’s sarcoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:10149–10154
Loh P-R, Genovese G, Handsaker RE et al (2018) Insights into clonal haematopoiesis from 8,342 mosaic chromosomal alterations. Nature 559:350–355
Machiela MJ, Zhou W, Sampson JN et al (2015) Characterization of large structural genetic mosaicism in human autosomes. Am J Hum Genet 96:487–497
Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K et al (2007) PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81:559–575
Loh P-R, Danecek P, Palamara PF et al (2016) Reference-based phasing using the Haplotype Reference Consortium panel. Nat Genet 48:1443–1448
Das S, Forer L, Schönherr S et al (2016) Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nat Genet 48:1284–1287
Brody JA, Morrison AC, Bis JC et al (2017) Analysis commons, a team approach to discovery in a big-data environment for genetic epidemiology. Nat Genet 49:1560–1563
McCarthy S, Das S, Kretzschmar W et al (2016) A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation. Nat Genet 48:1279–1283
Auton A, Abecasis GR, Altshuler DM et al (2015) A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526:68–74
Chen C-Y, Pollack S, Hunter DJ et al (2013) Improved ancestry inference using weights from external reference panels. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 29:1399–1406
Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM et al (2006) Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 38:904–909
Marchini J, Howie B, Myers S et al (2007) A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes. Nat Genet 39:906–913
Loh P-R, Tucker G, Bulik-Sullivan BK et al (2015) Efficient Bayesian mixed-model analysis increases association power in large cohorts. Nat Genet 47:284–290
Zhou W, Nielsen JB, Fritsche LG et al (2018) Efficiently controlling for case-control imbalance and sample relatedness in large-scale genetic association studies. Nat Genet 50:1335–1341
Turner S (2018) qqman: an R package for visualizing GWAS results using Q-Q and manhattan plots. In: J. Open Source Softw. https://doi.org/10.1101/005165. Accessed 27 Nov 2019
Machiela MJ, Chanock SJ (2015) LDlink: a web-based application for exploring population-specific haplotype structure and linking correlated alleles of possible functional variants. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 31:3555–3557
Machiela MJ, Chanock SJ (2018) LDassoc: an online tool for interactively exploring genome-wide association study results and prioritizing variants for functional investigation. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 34:887–889
Ward LD, Kellis M (2012) HaploReg: a resource for exploring chromatin states, conservation, and regulatory motif alterations within sets of genetically linked variants. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D930–D934
Boyle AP, Hong EL, Hariharan M et al (2012) Annotation of functional variation in personal genomes using RegulomeDB. Genome Res 22:1790–1797
Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 25:1754–1760
DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R et al (2011) A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 43:491–498
Garrison E, Marth G (2012) Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. ArXiv12073907 Q-Bio
Kim S, Scheffler K, Halpern AL et al (2018) Strelka2: fast and accurate calling of germline and somatic variants. Nat Methods 15:591–594
Layer RM, Chiang C, Quinlan AR, Hall IM (2014) LUMPY: a probabilistic framework for structural variant discovery. Genome Biol 15:R84
Chen X, Schulz-Trieglaff O, Shaw R et al (2016) Manta: rapid detection of structural variants and indels for germline and cancer sequencing applications. Bioinformatics 32:1220–1222
Wala JA, Bandopadhayay P, Greenwald N et al (2018) SvABA: genome-wide detection of structural variants and indels by local assembly. Genome Res 28(4):581–591. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.221028.117
Cibulskis K, Lawrence MS, Carter SL et al (2013) Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat Biotechnol 31:213–219
Wu MC, Lee S, Cai T et al (2011) Rare-variant association testing for sequencing data with the sequence kernel association test. Am J Hum Genet 89:82–93
Lee S, Emond MJ, Bamshad MJ et al (2012) Optimal unified approach for rare-variant association testing with application to small-sample case-control whole-exome sequencing studies. Am J Hum Genet 91:224–237
Lee S, Abecasis GR, Boehnke M, Lin X (2014) Rare-variant association analysis: study designs and statistical tests. Am J Hum Genet 95:5–23
Tate JG, Bamford S, Jubb HC et al (2019) COSMIC: the catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D941–D947
Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Riley GR et al (2014) ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D980–D985
Rentzsch P, Witten D, Cooper GM et al (2019) CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D886–D894
Ioannidis NM, Rothstein JH, Pejaver V et al (2016) REVEL: an ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants. Am J Hum Genet 99:877–885
Kim S, Jhong J-H, Lee J, Koo J-Y (2017) Meta-analytic support vector machine for integrating multiple omics data. BioData Min 10
Musa J, Cidre-Aranaz F, Aynaud M-M et al (2019) Cooperation of cancer drivers with regulatory germline variants shapes clinical outcomes. Nat Commun 10:1–10
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Machiela, M.J., Grünewald, T.G.P. (2021). Germline Variation and Somatic Alterations in Ewing Sarcoma. In: Cidre-Aranaz, F., G. P. Grünewald, T. (eds) Ewing Sarcoma . Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2226. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1020-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1020-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1019-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1020-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols