Skip to main content

Computational Approaches to Evaluate Ecotoxicity of Biocides: Cases from the Project COMBASE

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology ((MIPT))

Abstract

The evaluation of the ecotoxicological profile of chemicals is of high relevance when a substance can have an impact on the environment, such as the case of biocides. Due to the high number of animal tests conducted each year for regulatory purposes and the ethical considerations that this entails, the requirement of alternative methods by companies and regulatory agencies is increasing. Within these, in silico tools are useful to minimize time, costs, and resources, and they can be applied as alternatives to traditional laboratory assays.

In this chapter, we present some computational models developed in the context of the EU LIFE+ project entitled “Computational tool for the assessment and substitution of biocidal active substances of ecotoxicological concern (COMBASE)” (http://www.life-combase.com). The main objective of the project was the development of a tool based on computational toxicology, integrating predictive models of the toxic effects associated with biocidal substances at different trophic levels. Here, different quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for the estimation of ecotoxicity of biocides in microorganisms and fish are presented. First, an integrated model to predict the respiratory inhibition in activated sludge was developed, by combining sequentially a qualitative and a quantitative QSAR model. Previously to the development of the model, a set of 94 chemicals with known EC50 values was selected to this study, based on their “biocide-like” structural features. Second, a model to predict LC50 on rainbow trout was developed on a dataset made by collection data from OpenFoodTox database of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database of Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) (https://ecotox.ipmcenters.org/).

Both models showed good performances and robustness and have been integrated in the VEGA last release (version 1.1.5; https://www.vegahub.eu/) as well as the specific COMBASE tool (http://webtool.life-combase.com).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Gheorghe S, Stoica C et al (2019) Ecotoxicity of biocides (chemical disinfectants) – lethal and sublethal effects on non-target organisms. Revista de Chimie (Bucharest) 70(1):307–312

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. ECHA (2014) Transitional Guidance on Regulation (EU) No 528/ 2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (Biocidal Products Regulation, the BPR). European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki, Finland 2014

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guidance on the Biocidal Products Regulation Volume IV Environment – Assessment and Evaluation (Parts B + C) Version 2.0, October 2017

    Google Scholar 

  4. Myatt GJ, Ahlberg E et al (2018) In silico toxicology protocols. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 96:1–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gómez-Ganau S, De Julián-Ortiz JV, Gozalbes R (2018) Recent advances in computational approaches for designing potential anti-alzheimer’s agents. Springer Book “Computational modeling of drugs against Alzheimer’s disease”. Chapter 2, Pages 25–59 (Series: Neuromethods, Kunal Roy (ed.), Vol. 132, ISBN 978-1-4939-7404-7)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gozalbes R, de Julián Ortiz JV (2018) Applications of chemoinformatics in predictive toxicology for regulatory purposes, especially in the context of the EU REACH legislation. Int J Quantitat Struct-Prop Relat 3(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Valerio LG Jr (2011) In silico toxicology models and databases as FDA critical path initiative toolkits. Hum Genomics 5(3):200–207. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-7364-5-3-200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2007) Guidance document on the validation of (Quantitative)Structure-Activity Relationships [(Q)SAR] models. OECD Environment Health and Safety Publications. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/ehs/

  9. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test, OECD Chemicals Programme, Ecotoxicological Testing (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Willighagen EL, Mayfield JW et al (2017) The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK) v2.0: atom typing, depiction, molecular formulas, and substructure searching. J Cheminform 9(1):33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lagorce D, Sperandio O, Galons H, Miteva MA, Villoutreix BO (2008) FAF-Drugs2: free ADME/tox filtering tool to assist drug discovery and chemical biology projects. BMC Bioinformatics 9:396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yap CW (2011) PaDEL-descriptor: an open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints. J Comput Chem 32(7):1466–1474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cherkasov A, Muratov EN et al (2014 Jun 26) QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to? J Med Chem 57(12):4977–5010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. SANCO/10597/2003 –rev. 10.1 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Todeschini R, Consonni V (2009) Molecular descriptors for chemoinformatics. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA

    Google Scholar 

  16. StatSoft, Inc. (2007) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.0. http://www.statsoft.com

  17. Cheng H, Garrick DJ, Fernando RL (2017) Efficient strategies for leave-one-out cross validation for genomic best linear unbiased prediction. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 8:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0164-6. eCollection 2017. PubMed PMID: 28469846; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5414316

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dorne JL et al (2017) EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2017. OpenFoodTox: EFSA’s open source toxicological database on chemical hazards in food and feed. EFSA J 15(1):e15011. [3 pp.]. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.e15011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. OECD 203. OECD (1992) Test no. 203: fish, acute toxicity test, OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, section 2. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264069961-en

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Berthold MR, Cebron N, Dill F, Gabriel TR, Kötter T, Meinl T, Ohl P, Sieb C, Thiel K, Wiswedel B (2007) KNIME: The Konstanz information miner. In: Preisach C, Burkhardt H, Schmidt-Thieme L, Decker R (eds.) Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications – Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V (GfKL 2007), Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization, Berlin, Germany, pp 319–326

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kode (2016) Kode srl, Dragon (software for molecular descriptor calculation) version 7.0.4. 2016, software available at: https://chm.kode-solutions.net

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Gozalbes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Gómez-Ganau, S., Marzo, M., Gozalbes, R., Benfenati, E. (2020). Computational Approaches to Evaluate Ecotoxicity of Biocides: Cases from the Project COMBASE. In: Roy, K. (eds) Ecotoxicological QSARs. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0150-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0150-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0149-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0150-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics