Abstract
The parietal cortex supports a vast number of cognitive functions including visual attention, short-term memory, and decision-making. In particular, the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) is central to many of these tasks. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can identify at least six areas in IPS within individuals based upon topographic representations of the visual field. Recent studies have utilized novel mapping techniques to increase the feasibility of defining these topographic areas in individual participants with a high degree of reliability. This chapter introduces a method for demonstrating topographic maps that has been used across several different magnets and head coils to quickly and efficiently demonstrate occipital and parietal topographic maps. By increasing the efficiency with which laboratories can functionally map the parietal cortex, a greater number of studies can utilize objective identification of within-individual regions of interest. Increasing the accessibility of defining these topographic maps will further the goal of understanding the cognitive processes subserved by the parietal cortex.
The original version of this chapter was revised. The correction to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/7657_2019_29
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Change history
23 July 2019
This chapter was inadvertently published with incorrect Tables 1 and 2. The correct presentation is given here.
References
Inouye T (1909) Die Sehstörungen bei Schußverletzungen der kortikalen Sehsphäre: Nach Beobachtungen an Verwundeten der letzten japanischen Kriege. W. Engelmann Verlag, Leipzig
Sereno MI, McDonald CT, Allman JM (1994) Analysis of retinotopic maps in extrastriate cortex. Cereb Cortex 4:601–620
Tootell RB, Silverman MS, Valois DR (1981) Spatial frequency columns in primary visual cortex. Science 214:813–815
Sereno MI, Dale A, Reppas JB et al (1995) Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science 268(5212):889–893
DeYoe EA, Carman GJ, Bandettini P et al (1996) Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:2382–2386
Engel SA, Rumelhart DE, Wandell BA et al (1994) fMRI of human visual cortex. Nature 369:525
Tootell BR, Reppas JB, Kwong KK et al (1995) Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 15:3215–3230
Kastner S, De Weerd P, Desimone R et al (1998) Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. Science 282:108–111
Somers DC, Dale AM, Seiffert AE et al (1999) Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:1663–1668
Wandell BA, Winawer J (2011) Imaging retinotopic maps in the human brain. Vision Res 51:718–737
Benson NC, Jamison KW, Arcaro MJ et al (2018) The HCP 7T retinotopy dataset: description and pRF analysis. Biorxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/308247
Sheremata SL, Bettencourt KC, Somers DC (2010) Hemispheric asymmetry in visuotopic posterior parietal cortex emerges with visual short-term memory load. J Neurosci 30:12581–12588
Harvey BM, Klein BP, Petridou N et al (2013) Topographic representation of numerosity in the human parietal cortex. Science 341:1123–1126
Hutchinson BJ, Uncapher MR, Weiner KS et al (2012) Functional heterogeneity in posterior parietal cortex across attention and episodic memory retrieval. Cereb Cortex 24:bhs278
Liu T, Pleskac TJ (2011) Neural correlates of evidence accumulation in a perceptual decision task. J Neurophysiol 106:2383–2398
Todd JJ, Marois R (2004) Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature 428:751–754
Xu Y, Chun MM (2006) Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature 440:91–95
Sheremata SL, Somers DC, Shomstein S (2018) Visual short-term memory activity in parietal lobe reflects cognitive processes beyond attentional selection. J Neurosci 38:1511–1519
Serences JT, Ester EF, Vogel EK et al (2009) Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex. Psychol Sci 20:207–214
Cox RW (1996) AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 29:162–173
Dumoulin SO, Wandell BA (2008) Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 39:647–660
Silson EH, Chan AWY, Reynolds RC et al (2015) A retinotopic basis for the division of high-level scene processing between lateral and ventral human occipitotemporal cortex. J Neurosci 35:11921–11935
Sheremata SL, Silver MA (2015) Hemisphere-dependent attentional modulation of human parietal visual field representations. J Neurosci 35:508–517
Bressler DW, Fortenbaugh FC, Robertson LC et al (2013) Visual spatial attention enhances the amplitude of positive and negative fMRI responses to visual stimulation in an eccentricity-dependent manner. Vision Res 85:104–112
Sereno MI, Pitzalis S, Martinez A (2001) Mapping of contralateral space in retinotopic coordinates by a parietal cortical area in humans. Science 294:1350–1354
Hagler DJ, Sereno MI (2006) Spatial maps in frontal and prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage 29:567–577
Kastner S, DeSimone K, Konen CS et al (2007) Topographic maps in human frontal cortex revealed in memory-guided saccade and spatial working-memory tasks. J Neurophysiol 97:3494–3507
Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI (1999) Cortical surface-based analysis I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9:179–194
Swisher JD, Halko MA, Merabet LB et al (2007) Visual topography of human intraparietal sulcus. J Neurosci 27:5326–5337
Silver MA, Ress D, Heeger DJ (2005) Topographic maps of visual spatial attention in human parietal cortex. J Neurophysiol 94:1358–1371
Tootell RBH, Hadjikhani N, Hall EK et al (1998) The retinotopy of visual spatial attention. Neuron 21:1409–1422
Mackey WE, Winawer J, Curtis CE (2017) Visual field map clusters in human frontoparietal cortex. Elife 6:e22974
Wandell BA, Winawer J (2015) Computational neuroimaging and population receptive fields. Trends Cogn Sci 19:349–357
Amano K, Wandell BA, Dumoulin SO (2009) Visual field maps, population receptive field sizes, and visual field coverage in the human MT+ complex. J Neurophysiol 102:2704–2718
Silson EH, Reynolds RC, Kravitz DJ et al (2018) Differential sampling of visual space in ventral and dorsal early visual cortex. J Neurosci 38:2294–2303
Womelsdorf T, Anton-Erxleben K, Pieper F et al (2006) Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention. Nat Neurosci 9:1156–1160
de HB, Schwarzkopf DS, Anderson EJ et al (2014) Perceptual load affects spatial tuning of neuronal populations in human early visual cortex. Curr Biol 24:R66–R67
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Sheremata, S. (2019). Topographic Mapping of Parietal Cortex. In: Pollmann, S. (eds) Spatial Learning and Attention Guidance. Neuromethods, vol 151. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/7657_2019_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/7657_2019_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9947-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9948-4
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols