Skip to main content

Mitigating Antimicrobial Resistance Risks When Using Reclaimed Municipal Wastewater for Agriculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Antibiotic Resistance in the Environment

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 91))

  • 952 Accesses

Abstract

The global need for food is posing a serious threat to water security. Treated wastewater can be used as an alternative water supply to mitigate our reliance on nonrenewable waters (defined as water that cannot be replenished within our life span). However, concerns related to emerging contaminants such as antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) can impede efforts to push for widespread use of treated wastewater in agricultural irrigation. This chapter aims to provide a better understanding of the potential concerns by first using case studies in two countries that have already practiced water reuse. Second, we collate and analyze data that suggests that wastewater treatment plants able to achieve at least 8-log reduction in microbiological contaminants may suffice as appropriate intervention barriers for ARB dissemination to the environment. This chapter also recognizes that extracellular DNA-carrying ARGs may not be effectively removed even with membrane-based treatment. There is therefore a need to assess whether extracellular DNA may accumulate in agricultural soils due to repeated use of treated wastewater and to determine the concentrations of extracellular DNA needed to significantly increase horizontal gene transfer (HGT) in the natural environment. Given the large knowledge gaps that hinder an accurate assessment of the associated risks, it would be prudent to adopt the precautionary principle and to implement appropriate intervention strategies and best management practices that minimize the impacts and concerns arising from the reuse of treated wastewater in agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. FAO Water at a glance: the relationship between water, agriculture, food security and poverty. http://www.fao.org/3/ap505e/ap505e.pdf. 16 June 2019

  2. UN 2017 revision of world population prospects. https://population.un.org/wpp/. 16 June 2019

  3. Zarzo D, Prats D (2018) Desalination and energy consumption. What can we expect in the near future? Desalination 427:1–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. FAO Water report 34: Saudi Arabia. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/countries_regions/SAU/. 16 June 2019

  5. EPRI (2000) Water and sustainability (Volume 4): US electricity consumption for water supply and treatment – the next half century. 1006787; Palo Alto, CA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stillwell AS, King CW, Webber ME, Duncan IJ, Hardberger A (2011) The energy-water Nexus in Texas. Ecol Soc 16(1):2

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith K, Liu S (2017) Energy for conventional water supply and wastewater treatment in urban China: a review. Global Chall 1(5):1600016

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bolong N, Ismail AF, Salim MR, Matsuura T (2009) A review of the effects of emerging contaminants in wastewater and options for their removal. Desalination 239(1–3):229–246

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Loos R, Carvalho R, Antonio DC, Comero S, Locoro G, Tavazzi S, Paracchini B, Ghiani M, Lettieri T, Blaha L, Jarosova B, Voorspoels S, Servaes K, Haglund P, Fick J, Lindberg RH, Schwesig D, Gawlik BM (2013) EU-wide monitoring survey on emerging polar organic contaminants in wastewater treatment plant effluents. Water Res 47(17):6475–6487

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. WHO. The world medicines situation. https://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/pdf/s6160e/s6160e.pdf. 16 June 2019

  11. Martin I, Pidou M, Soares A, Judd S, Jefferson B (2011) Modelling the energy demands of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. Environ Technol 32(9):921–932

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. PUB Our water, out future. https://www.pub.gov.sg/Documents/PUBOurWaterOurFuture.pdf. 16 June 2019

  13. Ng C, Tay M, Tan B, Le TH, Haller L, Chen H, Koh TH, Barkham TMS, Gin KY (2017) Characterization of metagenomes in urban aquatic compartments reveals high prevalence of clinically relevant antibiotic resistance genes in wastewaters. Front Microbiol 8:2200

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yi X, Lin C, Ong EJL, Wang M, Li B, Zhou Z (2019) Expression of resistance genes instead of gene abundance are correlated with trace levels of antibiotics in urban surface waters. Environ Pollut 250:437–446

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lazarova V, Bahri A (2008) Water reuse practices for agriculture. In: Jimenez B, Asano T (eds) Water reuse: an international survey of current practice, issues and needs. IWA, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Asano T, Burton F, Leverenz H, Tsuchihashi R, Tchobanoglous G (2007) Water reuse: issues, technologies and applications. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. CCR California Code of Regulations – regulations related to recycled water. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/documents/lawbook/RWregulations_20181001.pdf. 24 Sept 2019

  18. Lazarova V, Bahri A (2004) Water reuse for irrigation: agriculture, landscapes, and turf grass. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  19. CDC Multistate outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 infections linked to romaine lettuce. https://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2018/o157h7-04-18/index.html. 16 June 2019

  20. FDA Environmental assessment of factors potentially contribution to the contamination of romaine lettuce implicated in a multi-state outbreak of E. coli O157:H7. https://www.fda.gov/food/outbreaks-foodborne-illness/environmental-assessment-factors-potentially-contributing-contamination-romaine-lettuce-implicated. 16 June 2019

  21. CDC Outbreak of E. coli infections linked to romaine lettuce. https://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2018/o157h7-11-18/index.html. 16 June 2019

  22. FDA Investigation summary: factors potentially contributing to the contamination of romaine lettuce implicated in the Fall 2018 multi-state outbreak of E. coli O157:H7. https://www.fda.gov/food/outbreaks-foodborne-illness/investigation-summary-factors-potentially-contributing-contamination-romaine-lettuce-implicated-fall. 16 June 2019

  23. Collignon P, Beggs JJ, Walsh TR, Gandra S, Laxminarayan R (2018) Anthropological and socioeconomic factors contributing to global antimicrobial resistance: a univariate and multivariable analysis. Lancet Planet Health 2(9):e398–e405

    Google Scholar 

  24. USEPA (2004) Guidelines for water reuse EPA 625/R-04/108. USEPA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  25. MWE (2006) Technical guidelines for the use of treated sanitary wastewater in irrigation for landscaping and agricultural irrigation. MWE, Riyadh

    Google Scholar 

  26. ISO (2015) ISO 16075-2: guidelines for treated wastewater use for irrigation projects. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  27. Angelakis AN, Bontoux L (2001) Wastewater reclamation and reuse in Eureau countries. Water Policy 3(1):47–59

    Google Scholar 

  28. Crook J, Surampalli RY (2005) Water reuse criteria in the United States. Water Supply 5(3–4):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  29. Al-Jassim N, Ansari MI, Harb M, Hong PY (2015) Removal of bacterial contaminants and antibiotic resistance genes by conventional wastewater treatment processes in Saudi Arabia: is the treated wastewater safe to reuse for agricultural irrigation? Water Res 73:277–290

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Metcalf, Eddy I, Tchobanoglous G, Burton F, Stensel HD (eds) (2002) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. George I, Crop P, Servais P (2002) Fecal coliform removal in wastewater treatment plants studied by plate counts and enzymatic methods. Water Res 36(10):2607–2617

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Harwood VJ, Levine AD, Scott TM, Chivukula V, Lukasik J, Farrah SR, Rose JB (2005) Validity of the indicator organism paradigm for pathogen reduction in reclaimed water and public health protection. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(6):3163–3170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Oakley S (2018) Preliminary treatment and primary settling. In: Rose JB, Jiménez-Cisneros B (eds) Global water pathogen project. MSU, East Lansing

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang K, Farahbakhsh K (2007) Removal of native coliphages and coliform bacteria from municipal wastewater by various wastewater treatment processes: implications to water reuse. Water Res 41(12):2816–2824

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Jenkins MW, Tiwari SK, Darby J (2011) Bacterial, viral and turbidity removal by intermittent slow sand filtration for household use in developing countries: experimental investigation and modeling. Water Res 45(18):6227–6239

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Paraskeva P, Graham NJ (2002) Ozonation of municipal wastewater effluents. Water Environ Res 74(6):569–581

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Harb M, Hong P-Y (2017) Anaerobic membrane bioreactor effluent reuse: a review of microbial safety concerns. Fermentation 3(3):39

    Google Scholar 

  38. Huang X, Zhao Z, Hernandez D, Jiang SC (2016) Near real-time flow cytometry monitoring of bacterial and viral removal efficiencies during water reclamation processes. Water 8(10):464

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pepper IL, Brooks JP, Gerba CP (2018) Antibiotic resistant bacteria in municipal wastes: is there reason for concern? Environ Sci Technol 52(7):3949–3959

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Negreanu Y, Pasternak Z, Jurkevitch E, Cytryn E (2012) Impact of treated wastewater irrigation on antibiotic resistance in agricultural soils. Environ Sci Technol 46(9):4800–4808

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hong PY, Yannarell AC, Dai Q, Ekizoglu M, Mackie RI (2013) Monitoring the perturbation of soil and groundwater microbial communities due to pig production activities. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(8):2620–2629

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Raynaud X, Nunan N (2014) Spatial ecology of bacteria at the microscale in soil. PLoS One 9(1):e87217

    Google Scholar 

  43. Al-Jassim N, Mantilla-Calderon D, Scarascia G, Hong PY (2018) Bacteriophages to sensitize a pathogenic New Delhi Metallo beta-lactamase-positive Escherichia coli to solar disinfection. Environ Sci Technol 52(24):14331–14341

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Al-Jassim N, Mantilla-Calderon D, Wang T, Hong PY (2017) Inactivation and gene expression of a virulent wastewater Escherichia coli strain and the nonvirulent commensal Escherichia coli DSM1103 strain upon solar irradiation. Environ Sci Technol 51(7):3649–3659

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. GASTAT. The quantity and the percentage of fresh water consumption by sector (municipal, industrial and agricultural) from 2010–2017. https://www.stats.gov.sa/sites/default/files/the_quantity_and_the_percentage_of_fresh_water_consumption_by_sector_municipal_industrial_and_agricultural_en.pdf. 16 June 2019

  46. Lu J, Wang Y, Li J, Mao L, Nguyen SH, Duarte T, Coin L, Bond P, Yuan Z, Guo J (2018) Triclosan at environmentally relevant concentrations promotes horizontal transfer of multidrug resistance genes within and across bacterial genera. Environ Int 121:1217–1226

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang Y, Lu J, Mao L, Li J, Yuan Z, Bond PL, Guo J (2018) Antiepileptic drug carbamazepine promotes horizontal transfer of plasmid-borne multi-antibiotic resistance genes within and across bacterial genera. ISME J 13:509

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang S, Wang Y, Song H, Lu J, Yuan Z, Guo J (2019) Copper nanoparticles and copper ions promote horizontal transfer of plasmid-mediated multi-antibiotic resistance genes across bacterial genera. Environ Int 129:478–487

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang Y, Gu AZ, He M, Li D, Chen J (2016) Subinhibitory concentrations of disinfectants promote the horizontal transfer of multidrug resistance genes within and across genera. Environ Sci Technol 51(1):570–580

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mantilla-Calderon D, Plewa MJ, Michoud G, Fodelianakis S, Daffonchio D, Hong PY (2019) Water disinfection byproducts increase natural transformation rates of environmental DNA in Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1. Environ Sci Technol 53(11):6520–6528

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ausburger N, Mantilla-Calderon D, Daffonchio D, Hong PY (2019) Acquisition of extracellular DNA by Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1 in response to solar and UV-C254 nm disinfection. Environ Sci Technol 53(17):10312–10319

    Google Scholar 

  52. FAO. Macroeconomy. http://www.fao.org/3/i2490e/i2490e01c.pdf. 16 June 2019

  53. LeChevallier MW, Kwok-Keung A (2004) Water treatment and pathogen control: process efficiency in achieving safe drinking water. IWA, London, p 112

    Google Scholar 

  54. Tunçsiper B (2007) Removal of nutrient and bacteria in pilot-scale constructed wetlands. J Environ Sci Health Part A Toxic/Hazard Subst Environ Eng 42(8):1117–1124

    Google Scholar 

  55. Alexandros SI, Akratos CS (2016) Removal of pathogenic Bacteria in constructed wetlands: mechanisms and efficiency. In: Ansari AA, Gill SS, Gill R, Lanza GR, Newman L (eds) Phytoremediation: management of environmental contaminants, vol 4. Springer, Cham, pp 327–346

    Google Scholar 

  56. Gollinitz WD, Cossins F, DeMarco J (1997) Impact of induced infiltration on microbial transport in an alluvial aquifer. In: Proceedings of the AWWA water quality technology conference, Denver, Co, 1997. AWWA, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  57. Cheng H, Hong PY (2017) Removal of antibiotic-resistant Bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes affected by varying degrees of fouling on anaerobic microfiltration membranes. Environ Sci Technol 51(21):12200–12209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Sakcham B, Kumar A, Cao B (2019) Extracellular DNA in monochloraminated drinking water and its influence on DNA-based profiling of a microbial community. Environ Sci Technol Lett 6(5):306–312

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Heuer H, Focks A, Lamshöft M, Smalla K, Matthies M, Spiteller M (2008) Fate of sulfadiazine administered to pigs and its quantitative effect on the dynamics of bacterial resistance genes in manure and manured soil. Soil Biol Biochem 40(7):1892–1900

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Heuer H, Smalla K (2007) Manure and sulfadiazine synergistically increased bacterial antibiotic resistance in soil over at least two months. Environ Microbiol 9(3):657–666

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Hong PY, Yannarell AC, Dai QH, Ekizoglu M, Mackie RI (2013) Monitoring the perturbation of soil and groundwater microbial communities due to pig production activities. Appl Environ Microb 79(8):2620–2629

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Sirois SH, Buckley DH (2019) Factors governing extracellular DNA degradation dynamics in soil. Environ Microbiol Rep 11(2):173–184

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Hiom K (2009) DNA repair: common approaches to fixing double-strand breaks. Curr Biol 19(13):R523–R525

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Thomas CM, Nielsen KM (2005) Mechanisms of, and barriers to, horizontal gene transfer between Bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 3(9):711–721

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Martín J, Camacho-Muñoz D, Santos JL, Aparicio I, Alonso E (2012) Occurrence of pharmaceutical compounds in wastewater and sludge from wastewater treatment plants: removal and ecotoxicological impact of wastewater discharges and sludge disposal. J Hazard Mater 239–240:40–47

    Google Scholar 

  66. Mohan S, Balakrishnan P (2019) Triclosan in Treated Wastewater from a City Wastewater Treatment Plant and its Environmental Risk Assessment. Water Air Soil Pollut 230(3):69

    Google Scholar 

  67. Oliveira Ada S, Bocio A, Trevilato TM, Takayanagui AM, Domingo JL, Segura-Munoz SI (2007) Heavy metals in untreated/treated urban effluent and sludge from a biological wastewater treatment plant. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 14(7):483–489

    Google Scholar 

  68. IPCC (2018) Global warming of 1.5°C. IPCC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  69. Hong PY, Julian TR, Pype ML, Jiang SC, Nelson KL, Graham D, Pruden A, Manaia CM (2018) Reusing treated wastewater: consideration of the safety aspects associated with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes. Water 10(3):244

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This review paper is supported by KAUST Baseline Funding BAS/1/1033-01-01 awarded to P.Y.H.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pei-Ying Hong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hong, PY., Wang, C., Mantilla-Calderon, D. (2020). Mitigating Antimicrobial Resistance Risks When Using Reclaimed Municipal Wastewater for Agriculture. In: Manaia, C., Donner, E., Vaz-Moreira, I., Hong, P. (eds) Antibiotic Resistance in the Environment . The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 91. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2020_473

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics