Skip to main content

Evaluation of Bacterial Biofilm Removal Properties of MEDSTER 2000 Cold Sterilant on Different Materials

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Public Health

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AMIDPH,volume 1282))

Abstract

We studied the antibacterial and anti-biofilm properties of MEDSTER 2000, a pH neutral biodegradable mixed acidic peroxide disinfectant belonging to the class IIb medical device which has been designed for decontamination and cold sterilization of hospital instruments. The broth microdilution method was used to define the antibacterial activity against planktonic form of both classified bacteria and antibiotic resistant strains of clinical source, whereas effectiveness toward their biofilm was determined on mature biofilm, grown both on plastic and stainless steel surfaces. The results showed that for the planktonic form the antibacterial activity of MEDSTER 2000 was already observed after 10 min at the lowest concentration (0.1%), and this effect was not exposure-and/or concentration-dependent. After the same time of exposure at the concentration of 2% the disinfectant was able to completely eradicate all tested bacteria grown in sessile form on both surfaces, with a greater than 6 log CFU/cm2 reduction in viable cells. This result is supported by the microscope observation by crystal violet and live/dead assays. For the high antibacterial and anti-biofilm ability emerged, MEDSTER 2000 could represent a new and more effective approach for semicritical devices that need a high-level disinfection and could not sustain the process of heat sterilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alfa MJ, Singh H (2020) Impact of wet storage and other factors on biofilm formation and contamination of patient-ready endoscopes: a narrative review. Gastrointest Endosc 91:236–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almatroudi A, Tahir S, Hu H et al (2018) Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are more resistant to heat treatment than traditional hydrated biofilms. J Hosp Infect 98:161–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Assere A, Oulahal N, Carpentier B (2008) Comparative evaluation of methods for counting surviving biofilm cells adhering to a polyvinyl chloride surface exposed to chlorine or drying. J Appl Microbiol 104:1692–1702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beech IB, Sunner JA, Arciola CR et al (2006) Microbially-influenced corrosion: damage to prostheses, delight for bacteria. Int J Artif Organs 29:443–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chino T, Nukui Y, Morishita Y et al (2017) Morphological bactericidal fast-acting effects of peracetic acid, a high-level disinfectant, against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in tubing. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 6:122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury D, Rahman A, Hu H et al (2019) Effect of disinfectant formulation and organic soil on the efficacy of oxidizing disinfectants against biofilms. J Hosp Infect 103:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condò C, Anacarso I, Sabia C et al (2020) Antimicrobial activity of spices essential oils and its effectiveness on mature biofilms of human pathogens. Nat Prod Res 34:567–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa DM, Johani K, Melo DS et al (2019) Biofilm contamination of high-touched surfaces in intensive care units: epidemiology and potential impacts. Lett Appl Microbiol 68:269–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davey ME, O’Toole GA (2000) Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:847–867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies D (2003) Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2:114–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Beer D, Srinivasan R, Stewart PS (1994) Direct measurement of chlorine penetration into biofilms during disinfection. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:4339–4344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECDC-European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2019) Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Europe 2018, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Azizi M, Farag N, Khardori N (2016) Efficacy of selected biocides in the decontamination of common nosocomial bacterial pathogens in biofilm and planktonic forms. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 47:60–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin-Mechin L, Dubois-Brissonnet F, Heyd B, Leveau JY (1999) Specific variations of fatty acid composition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 15442 induced by quaternary ammonium compounds and relation with resistance to bactericidal activity. J Appl Microbiol 87:735–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall-Stoodley L, Stoodley P (2005) Biofilm formation and dispersal and the transmission of human pathogens. Trends Microbiol 13:7–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu H, Johania K, Gosbell IB et al (2015) Intensive care unit environmental surfaces are contaminated by multidrug -resistant bacteria in biofilms: combined results of conventional culture, pyrosequencing, scanning electron microscopy, and confocal laser microscopy. J Hosp Infect 91:35–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jang A, Szabo J, Hosni AA, Coughlin M, Bishop PL (2006) Measurement of chlorine dioxide penetration in dairy process pipe biofilms during disinfection. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72:368–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ledwoch K, Maillard JY (2018) Candida auris dry surface biofilm (DSB) for disinfectant efficacy testing. Materials (Basel). 12. (1):pii: E18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12010018

  • Méchin L, Dubois-Brissonnet F, Heyd B, Leveau JY (1999) Adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 15442 to didecyldimethylammonium bromide induces changes in membrane fatty acid composition and in resistance of cells. J Appl Microbiol 86:859–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messi P (2013) Biofilm formation, development and relevance. In: Biofilm in bioengineering, vol 268. Nova Science, Hauppauge, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer B, Eschborn S, Schmidt M et al (2019) Advantage of pH-neutral peracetic acid over peracetic acid in reduction of viable count of biofilms. J Hosp Infect. pii: S0195-6701(19)30536-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves MS, da Silva MG, Ventura GM et al (2016) Effectiveness of current disinfection procedures against biofilm on contaminated GI endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 83:944–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otter JA, Vickery K, Walker JT et al (2015) Surface-attached cells, biofilms and biocide susceptibility: implications for hospital cleaning and disinfection. J Hosp Infect 89:16–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Percival SL, Suleman L, Vuotto C et al (2015) Healthcare-associated infections, medical devices and biofilms: risk, tolerance and control. J Med Microbiol 64:323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Procópio L (2019) The role of biofilms in the corrosion of steel in marine environments. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 35:73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skowron K, Hulisz K, Gryń G, Olszewska H, Wiktorczyk N, Paluszak Z (2018) Comparison of selected disinfectants efficiency against Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formed on various surfaces. Int Microbiol 21:23–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stepanović S, Vuković D, Hola V et al (2007) Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendation for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS 115:891–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tote K, Horemans T, Vanden Berghe D, Maes L, Cos P (2010) Inhibitory effect of biocides on the viable masses and matrices of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:31353–31142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watnick P, Kolter R (2000) Biofilm, city of microbes. J Bacteriol 182:2675–2679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrizia Messi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Iseppi, R., Feminò, R., Sabia, C., Messi, P. (2020). Evaluation of Bacterial Biofilm Removal Properties of MEDSTER 2000 Cold Sterilant on Different Materials. In: Donelli, G. (eds) Advances in Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Public Health. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology(), vol 1282. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2020_542

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics