Abstract
The goal of immunosuppressive therapy post-transplantation in pediatric renal transplant recipients is to prevent acute and chronic rejection while minimizing drug side effects. Most therapies alter immune response mechanisms but are not immunologically specific, and a careful balance is required to find the dose that prevents rejection of the graft while minimizing the risks of overimmunosuppression leading to infection and cancer. While this chapter because of space constraints focuses on immunosuppressive therapy in pediatric renal transplant recipients, many aspects can be applied on pediatric recipients of other solid organ transplants such as the liver and heart. The major maintenance immunosuppressive agents currently used in various combination regimens are tacrolimus, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, everolimus, sirolimus, and glucocorticoids (steroids). Although data from adult renal transplantation trials are used to help guide management decisions in pediatric patients, immunosuppressive therapy in pediatric renal transplant recipients often must be modified because of the unique dosage requirements and clinical effects of these agents in children, including their impact on growth and development. The optimal immunosuppressive therapy post-transplant is not established. The goal remains to find the best combination of immunosuppressive agents that optimizes allograft survival by preventing acute rejection while limiting drug toxicities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allison AC, Eugui EM (2005) Mechanisms of action of mycophenolate mofetil in preventing acute and chronic allograft rejection. Transplantation 80:181–190
Barletta GM, Kirk E, Gardner JJ et al (2009) Rapid discontinuation of corticosteroids in pediatric renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 13:571–578
Benfield MR, Bartosh S, Ikle D et al (2010) A randomized double-blind, placebo controlled trial of steroid withdrawal after pediatric renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 10:81–88
Brandhorst G, Tenderich G, Zittermann A et al (2008) Everolimus exposure in cardiac transplant recipients is influenced by concomitant calcineurin inhibitor. Ther Drug Monit 30:113–116
Bunchman T, Navarro M, Broyer M et al (2001) The use of mycophenolate mofetil suspension in pediatric renal allograft recipients. Pediatr Nephrol 16:978–984
Campana C, Regazzi MB, Buggia I et al (1996) Clinically significant drug interactions with cyclosporin. An update. Clin Pharmacokinet 30:141–179
Cattaneo D, Perico N, Gaspari F et al (2002) Glucocorticoids interfere with mycophenolate mofetil bioavailability in kidney transplantation. Kidney Int 62:1060–1067
Certican (2012) Basic prescribing information. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel
Chavers BM, Chang C, Gillingham KJ et al (2009) Pediatric kidney transplantation using a novel protocol of rapid (6-day) discontinuation of prednisolone: 2-year results. Transplantation 88:237–241
Cooperative European Paediatric Renal Transplant Initiative (CERTAIN) Registry (2019) www.certain-registry.eu. Accessed 15 Aug 2019
Cransberg K, Marlies Cornelissen EA, Davin JC et al (2005) Improved outcome of pediatric kidney transplantations in the Netherlands–effect of the introduction of mycophenolate mofetil? Pediatr Transplant 9:1004–1011
Crowe A, Bruelisauer A, Duerr L et al (1999) Absorption and intestinal metabolism of SDZ-RAD and rapamycin in rats. Drug Metab Dispos 27:627–632
Dantal J, Hourmant M, Cantarovich D et al (1998) Effect of long-term immunosuppression in kidney-graft recipients on cancer incidence: randomised comparison of two cyclosporin regimens. Lancet 351:623–628
Ekberg H, Tedesco-Silva H, Demirbas A et al ELITE-Symphony Study (2007) Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 357:2562–2575
Elion GB (1993) The pharmacology of azathioprine. Ann N Y Acad Sci 685:400–407
Ettenger R, Hoyer PF, Grimm P et al (2008) Multicenter trial of everolimus in pediatric renal transplant recipients: results at three year. Pediatr Transplant 12:456–463
Ferraris JR, Tambutti ML, Redal MA et al (2000) Conversion from azathioprine [correction of azathioprina] to mycophenolate mofetil in pediatric renal transplant recipients with chronic rejection. Transplantation 70:297–301
Ferraris JR, Ghezzi LF, Vallejo G et al (2005) Improved long-term allograft function in pediatric renal transplantation with mycophenolate mofetil. Pediatr Transplant 9:178–182
Filler G, Webb NJ, Milford DV et al (2005) Four-year data after pediatric renal transplantation: a randomized trial of tacrolimus vs. cyclosporin microemulsion. Pediatr Transplant 9:498–503
Franchimont D (2004) Overview of the actions of glucocorticoids on the immune response: a good model to characterize new pathways of immunosuppression for new treatment strategies. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1024:124–137
Ganschow R, Pape L, Sturm E et al (2013) Growing experience with mTOR inhibitors in pediatric solid organ transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 17:694–706
Goggins WC, Pascual MA, Powelson JA et al (2003) A prospective, randomized, clinical trial of intraoperative versus postoperative thymoglobulin in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 76:798–802
Grenda R, Watson A, Vondrak K et al (2006) A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of tacrolimus-based therapy with or without basiliximab in pediatric renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 6:1666–1672
Grenda R, Watson A, Trompeter R et al (2010) A randomized trial to assess the impact of early steroid withdrawal on growth in pediatric renal transplantation: the TWIST study. Am J Transplant 10:828–836
Gurk-Turner C, Airee R, Philosophe B et al (2008) Thymoglobulin dose optimization for induction therapy in high risk kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 85:1425–1430
Habbig S, Volland R, Krupka K et al (2017) Dyslipidemia after pediatric renal transplantation-the impact of immunosuppressive regimens. Pediatr Transplant 21(3):e12914
Halloran PF (2004) Immunosuppressive drugs for kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 351:2715–2729
Henne T, Latta K, Strehlau J et al (2003) Mycophenolate mofetil-induced reversal of glomerular filtration loss in children with chronic allograft nephropathy. Transplantation 76:1326–1330
Höcker B, Tönshoff B (2009) Treatment strategies to minimize or prevent chronic allograft dysfunction in pediatric renal transplant recipients: an overview. Paediatr Drugs 11:381–396
Höcker B, Tönshoff B (2011) Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in pediatric renal transplantation: a viable option? Paediatr Drugs 13:49–69
Höcker B, Weber LT, Bunchman T et al (2005) Mycophenolate mofetil suspension in pediatric renal transplantation: three-year data from the tricontinental trial. Pediatr Transplant 9:504–511
Höcker B, Kovarik JM, Daniel V et al (2008) Pharmacokinetics and immunodynamics of basiliximab in pediatric renal transplant recipients on mycophenolate mofetil comedication. Transplantation 86:1234–1240
Höcker B, Weber LT, Feneberg R et al (2009) Prospective, randomized trial on late steroid withdrawal in pediatric renal transplant recipients under cyclosporine microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil. Transplantation 87:934–941
Höcker B, Weber L, Feneberg R et al (2010) Improved growth and cardiovascular risk after late steroid withdrawal: 2-year results of a prospective, randomized trial in paediatric renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 25:617–624
Höcker B, van Gelder T, Martin-Govantes J et al (2011) Comparison of MMF efficacy and safety in paediatric vs. adult renal transplantation: subgroup analysis of the randomised, multicentre FDCC trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 26:1073–1079
Höcker B, Zencke S, Pape L et al (2016) Impact of everolimus and low-dose cyclosporin on cytomegalovirus replication and disease in pediatric renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 16:921–929
Ingulli E, Tejani A (1994) Steroid withdrawal after renal transplantation. In: Tejani AH, Fine RM (eds) Pediatric renal transplantation. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 221–238
Jungraithmayr T, Staskewitz A, Kirste G et al (2003) Pediatric renal transplantation with mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression without induction: results after three years. Transplantation 75:454–461
Kirchner GI, Meier-Wiedenbach I, Manns MP (2004) Clinical pharmacokinetics of everolimus. Clin Pharmacokinet 43:83–95
Kovarik JM, Kalbag J, Figuerredo J et al (2002) Differential influence of two cyclosporine formulations on everolimus pharmacokinetics: a clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction. J Clin Pharmacol 42:95–99
Kovarik JM, Curtis JJ, Hricik DE et al (2006) Differential pharmacokinetic interaction of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on everolimus. Transplant Proc 38:3456–3458
Le Meur Y, Büchler M, Thierry A et al (2007) Individualized mycophenolate mofetil dosing based on drug exposure significantly improves patient outcomes after renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 7:2496–2503
Mahalati K, Kahan BD (2001) Clinical pharmacokinetics of sirolimus. Clin Pharmacokinet 40:573–585
Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CL et al (2003) The natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy. N Engl J Med 349:2326–2333
Neu AM, Ho PL, Fine RN et al (2003) Tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine A as primary immunosuppression in pediatric renal transplantation: a NAPRTCS study. Pediatr Transplant 7:217–222
Noble J, Jouve T, Janbon B et al (2019) Belatacept in kidney transplantation and its limitations. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 15:359–367
Offner G, Toenshoff B, Höcker B et al (2008) Efficacy and safety of basiliximab in pediatric renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Transplantation 86:1241–1248
Ojo AO, Held PJ, Port FK et al (2003) Chronic renal failure after transplantation of a nonrenal organ. N Engl J Med 349:931–940
Pape L, Ahlenstiel T, Ehrich JH et al (2007) Reversal of loss of glomerular filtration rate in children with transplant nephropathy after switch to everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine A. Pediatr Transplant 11:291–295
Pape L, Offner G, Kreuzer M et al (2010) De novo therapy with everolimus, low-dose cyclosporine A, basiliximab and steroid elimination in pediatric kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 10:2349–2354
Peddi VR, Bryant M, Roy-Chaudhury P et al (2002) Safety, efficacy, and cost analysis of thymoglobulin induction therapy with intermittent dosing based on CD3+ lymphocyte counts in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients. Transplantation 73:1514–1518
Rapamune (2011) Summary of product characteristics. Pfizer, New York
Rubik J, Debray D, Iserin F et al (2019a) Comparative pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in stable pediatric allograft recipients converted from immediate-release tacrolimus to prolonged-release tacrolimus formulation. Pediatr Transplant 23:e13391
Rubik J, Debray D, Kelly D et al (2019b) Efficacy and safety of prolonged-release tacrolimus in stable pediatric allograft recipients converted from immediate-release tacrolimus – a Phase 2, open-label, single-arm, one-way crossover study. Transpl Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.13479
Sarwal MM, Vidhun JR, Alexander SR et al (2003) Continued superior outcomes with modification and lengthened follow-up of a steroid-avoidance pilot with extended daclizumab induction in pediatric renal transplantation. Transplantation 76:1331–1339
Sarwal MM, Ettenger RB, Dharnidharka V et al (2012) Complete corticosteroid avoidance is effective and safe in children with renal transplants: a multicentre randomized trial with three year follow-up. Am J Transplant 12:2719–2729
Shapiro R, Ellis D, Tan HP et al (2006) Antilymphoid antibody preconditioning and tacrolimus monotherapy for pediatric kidney transplantation. J Pediatr 148:813–818
Shipkova M, Armstrong VW, Oellerich M et al (2005) Mycophenolate mofetil in organ transplantation: focus on metabolism, safety and tolerability. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 1:505–526
Staskewitz A, Kirste G, Tönshoff B et al (2001) Mycophenolate mofetil in pediatric renal transplantation without induction therapy: results after 12 months of treatment. Transplantation 71:638–644
Sterkers G, Baudouin V, Ansart-Pirenne H et al (2000) Duration of action of a chimeric interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, basiliximab, in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 32:2757–2759
Stevens RB, Mercer DF, Grant WJ et al (2008) Randomized trial of single-dose versus divided-dose rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction in renal transplantation: an interim report. Transplantation 85:1391–1399
Stratta RJ, Sundberg AK, Farney AC et al (2005) Experience with alternate-day thymoglobulin induction in pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage. Transplant Proc 37:3546–3548
Sutherland S, Li L, Concepcion W et al (2009) Steroid-free immunosuppression in pediatric renal transplantation: rationale for and outcomes following conversion to steroid based therapy. Transplantation 87:1744–1748
Tanabe K (2003) Calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation: what is the best option? Drugs 3:1535–1548
Tedesco-Silva H, Felipe C, Ferreira A et al (2015) Reduced incidence of cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus and reduced tacrolimus doses. Am J Transplant 15:2655–2664
The NAPRTCS (2014) Annual report. https://web.emmes.com/study/ped/index.htm
Tönshoff B, Höcker B (2006) Treatment strategies in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients with calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity. Pediatr Transplant 10:721–729
Tönshoff B, David-Neto E, Ettenger R et al (2011) Pediatric aspects of therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid in renal transplantation. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 25:78–89
Tönshoff B, Ettenger R, Dello Strologo L et al (2019) Early conversion of pediatric kidney transplant patients to everolimus with reduced tacrolimus and steroid elimination: results of a randomized trial. Am J Transplant 19:811–822
Trompeter R, Filler G, Webb NJ et al (2002) Randomized trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin microemulsion in renal transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol 7:141–149
van Gelder T (2002) Drug interactions with tacrolimus. Drug Saf 25:707–712
van Gelder T, Le Meur Y, Shaw LM et al (2006) Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in transplantation. Ther Drug Monit 28:145–154
van Gelder T, Silva HT, de Fijter JW et al (2008) Comparing mycophenolate mofetil regimens for de novo renal transplant recipients: the fixed-dose concentration-controlled trial. Transplantation 86:1043–1051
van Leuven SI, Kastelein JJ, Allison AC et al (2006) Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF): firing at the atherosclerotic plaque from different angles? Cardiovasc Res 69:341–347
Venkataramanan R, Jain A, Warty VW et al (1991) Pharmacokinetics of FK 506 following oral administration: a comparison of FK 506 and cyclosporine. Transplant Proc 23:931–933
Webb N, Douglas S, Rajai A et al (2015) Corticosteroid-free kidney transplantation improves growth: two-year follow-up of the TWIST randomised controlled trial. Transplantation 99:1178–1185
Webb NJA, Baumann U, Camino M et al (2019) Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus granules in pediatric de novo liver, kidney, and heart transplantation: the OPTION study. Pediatr Transplant 23:e13328
Weber LT, Shipkova M, Armstrong VW et al (2002) The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship for total and free mycophenolic acid in pediatric renal transplant recipients: a report of the German study group on mycophenolate mofetil therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol 13:759–768
Wong W, Agrawal N, Pascual M et al (2006) Comparison of two dosages of thymoglobulin used as a short-course for induction in kidney transplantation. Transpl Int 19:629–635
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tönshoff, B. (2019). Immunosuppressants in Organ Transplantation. In: Kiess, W., Schwab, M., van den Anker, J. (eds) Pediatric Pharmacotherapy . Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol 261. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2019_331
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2019_331
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50493-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50494-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)