Skip to main content

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Wound Isolates in Plastic Surgery Patients at a Tertiary Care Centre

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Plastic and Thoracic Surgery, Orthopedics and Ophthalmology

Abstract

The presence of microorganism with or without associated inflammation in the surgical site leads to wound infection. The isolation of organism helps in the management of the wound, and its susceptibility pattern to antibiotics helps in selecting the most appropriate antibiotic to fasten recovery. Wound infection in plastic surgery patients not only increases the morbidity of the patients and increases the hospital stay but also increases the financial burden to the patient and the health-care provider. Proper knowledge of the wound isolates and their susceptibility pattern in the hospital helps in knowing the resistance pattern to antibiotics and in formulating guidelines for antibiotic administration in an institute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watts JMK, McDonald PJ, O’Brien PE, Marshall VR, Finlay Jones JJ (eds) (1981) Infection in surgery: basic and clinical aspects. Churchill Livingstone, New York, p 27

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nuland SB (2003) The doctor’s plague: germs, childbed fever, and the strange story of ignaz semmelweis. WW Norton and Co., New York, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tabrah F (2011) L Koch’s postulates, carnivorous cows and tuberculosis today. Hawaii Med J 70(7):144–148

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wainwright M, Kristiansen JE (2011) On the 75th anniversary of prontosil. Dyes Pigments 88(3):231–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aminov RI (2010) A brief history of the antibiotic era: lessons learnt and challenges for the future. Front Microbiol 1:134

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan SY, Tatsumura Y (2015) Alexander fleming (1881–1955): discoverer of penicillin. Singap Med J 56(7):366–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rondass AA, Schols JM, Halfens RJ, Stobberingh EE (2013) Swab versus biopsy for the diagnosis of chronic infected wounds. Adv Skin Wound Care 26(5):211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Angel DE, Lloyd P, Carville K, Santamaria N (2011) The clinical efficacy of two semi-quantitative wound swabbing techniques in identifying the causative organism(s) in infected cutaneous wounds. Int Wound J 8(2):176–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bill TJ, Ratliff CR, Donovan AM, Knox LK, Morgan RF, Rhodeheaver GT (2001) Quantitative swab culture versus tissue biopsy: a comparison in chronic wounds. Ostomy Wound Manage 47(1):34–37

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith ME, Robinowitz N, Chaulk P, Johnson K (2014) Comparison of chronic wound culture techniques: swab versus curetted tissue for microbial recovery. Br J Community Nursing 19(90):s22–s26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Copeland Halperin LR, Kaminsky AJ, Bluefeld N, Miraliakbari R (2016) Sample procurement for culture of infected wounds: a systematic review. J Wound Care 25(4):s4-6–s8-10

    Google Scholar 

  12. Slater RA, Lazarovitch T, Boldur I, Ramot Y, Buchs A, Weiss M, Hindi A, Rapoport MJ (2004) Swab cultures accurately identify bacterial pathogens in diabetic foot wounds not involving bone. Diabet Med 21(7):705–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferreira MC, Junior PT, Carvalho VF, Kamamoto F (2006) Complex wounds. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 61(6):571–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Coltro PS, Ferreira MC, Bastia BPSN, Nakamoto HA, Milcheski DA, Tuma Junior P (2011) Role of plastic surgery on the treatment complex wounds. Rev Col Bras Cir 38(6):381–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boyce DE, Shokrollahi K (2006) Reconstructive surgery. BMJ 332(7543):710–712

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Neligen PC, Gurtner GC (eds) (2013) Plastic surgery. Elsevier, New York, p 536

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hsu P, Bullock J, Matthews M (2006) Infection prophylaxis update. Semin Plast Surg 20(4):241–248

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. LeRoy J, Given KS (1991) Wound infection in breast augmentation: the role of prophylactic perioperative antibiotics. Aesthet Plast Surg 15(4):303–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Serletti JM, Devenport MS, Herrera HR, Caldwell EH (1994) Efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in reduction mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 33(5):476–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grazer FM, Goldwyn RM (1977) Abdominoplasty assessed by survey, with emphasis on complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 59(4):513–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kompatscher P, Von Planta A, Spicher I, Seifert B, Vetter S, Minder J, Beer GM (2003) Comparison of the incidence of the predicted risk of early surgical site infections after breast reduction. Aesthet Plast Surg 27(4):308–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Soundararajan V, Hart NB, Royston CM (1995) Abdominoplasty following vertical banded gastroplasty for morbid obesity. Br J Plast Surg 48(6):423–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chole RA, Yee J (1987) Antibiotic prophylaxis for facial fractures. A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113(10):1055–1057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Becker GD (1981) Chemoprophylaxis for surgery of the head and neck. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 90(3Pt3):8–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nkang AO, Okonko IO, Majeha OK, Adewale OG, Udeze AO, Fowotade A, Fajobi EA, Adedeji O, Babalola ET (2009) Assessment of antibiotics susceptibility profiles of some selected clinical isolates from laboratory in Nigeria. J Microbiol Antimicrobials 1(2):19–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Belkum AV, Dunne WM (2013) Next generation antimicrobial susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbiol 51(7):2018–2024

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Turnidge J (2003) Pharmacodynamics and dosing of aminoglycosides. Infect Dis Clin N Am 17:503–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Scheife RT (1989) Protein binding: what does it mean? DCIP 23(7–8 Suppl):S27–S31

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Levison ME, Levison JH (2009) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibacterial agents. Infect Dis Clin N Am 23(4):791–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Spivey JM (1992) The postantibiotic effect. Clin Pharm 11(10):865–875

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McDonald PJ, Wetherall BL, Pruul H (1981) Postantibiotic leucocyte enhancement: increased susceptibility of bacteria pretreated with antibiotics to activity of leucocytes. Rev Infect Dis 3(1):38–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sanchez NA, Sanchez RMM (1999) Basis of anti-infective therapy: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic criteria and methodology for dual dose individualisation. Clin Pharmacokinet 37(4):289–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Manikandan C, Amsath A (2013) Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial strains isolated from wound infection patients in Pattukkottai, Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 2(6):195–203

    Google Scholar 

  34. Patil SB, Paramne A, Harsh S (2016t) Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of wound isolates in plastic surgery patients at a tertiary care centre. Indian J Plast Surg 49(2):198–205

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Mama M, Abdissa A, Sewunet T (2014) Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates from wound infection and their sensitivity to alternative topical agents at Jimma University specialized hospital, south West Ethiopia. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 13:14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Goswami N, Trivedi HR, Goswami AP (2011) Antibiotic sensitivity profile of bacterial pathogens in postoperative wound infections at a tertiary care hospital in Gujrat, India. Aust J Pharm 2:158–164

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mulu A, Moges F, Tessema B, Kassu A (2006) Pattern and multiple drug resistance of bacterial pathogens isolated from wound infection at University of Gondar Teaching Hospital, northwestern Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J 44(2):125–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mwambete KD, Rugemalila D (2015) Antibiotic resistance profiles of bacteria isolated from surgical wounds in tertiary hospitals, Tanzania. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 4(1):448–455

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Surendra B. Patil M.S., M.Ch. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Patil, S.B., Harsh, S. (2018). Antibiotic Susceptibility of Wound Isolates in Plastic Surgery Patients at a Tertiary Care Centre. In: Shiffman, M., Low, M. (eds) Plastic and Thoracic Surgery, Orthopedics and Ophthalmology. Recent Clinical Techniques, Results, and Research in Wounds, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/15695_2017_71

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/15695_2017_71

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10709-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10710-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics