Skip to main content

On the Convergence of the h-p Finite Element Method for Solving Boundary Value Problems in Physical Geodesy

  • Conference paper
International Symposium on Earth and Environmental Sciences for Future Generations

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 147))

Abstract

A geopotential model of the Earth is usually calculated using the Stokes coefficients. As computational power has increased, research is focusing more on new ways of gravity field modelling. The objective of this work is to study an application of the h-p finite element method for solving boundary value problems in physical geodesy. For the purpose of studying this method, we have formulated model boundary value problems with different boundary conditions. The algorithm for solving these test problems was designed and was subsequently implemented by the program. We derived a weak formulation for each model boundary value problem and also the corresponding finite element discretization. We used isoparametric reference elements with linear and quadratic shape functions. The authors present the application of the h and p methodologies for increasing the rate of convergence of our solution, discuss mesh generation for large domains, and also solve the model boundary value problem, which is similar to the geodetic boundary value problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babuška I, Dorr MR (1981) Error estimates for the combined h and p version of finite element method. Numer Math 37:252–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Babuška I, Suri M (1990) The p- and h-p versions of the finite element method an overview. In: Canuto C, Quarteroni A (eds) Spectral and high order methods for partial differential equations. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 5–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Babuška I, Szabo B (1982) On the rates of convergence of the finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 18:323–341. doi:10.1002/nme.1620180302

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathe K (1999) Finite element procedures. Prentice Hall, Prentice

    Google Scholar 

  • Čunderlík R, Mikula K, Mojzeš M (2008) Numerical solution of the linearized fixed gravimetric boundary-value problem. J Geod 82(1):15–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergatoudis J, Irons B, Zienkiewicz O (1968) Curved, isoparametric, quadrilateral elements for finite element analysis. Int J Solids Struct 4:31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Fašková Z, Čunderlík, Mikula K (2010) Finite element method for solving geodetic boundary value problems. J Geod 84(2):135–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafarend E (1989) The geoid and the gravimetric boundary value problem, Report No 18. The Royal Institute of Technology (Dep of Geod), Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafarend E, Niemeier W (1971) The free nonlinear boundary value problem of physical geodesy. Bull Geod 101:243–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafarend E, Heck B, Knickmeyer E (1985) The free versus fixed geodetic boundary value problem for different combinations of geodetic observables. Bull Geod 59(1):11–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Moritz H (2005) Physical geodesy. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (2000) Direct methods in physical geodesy. In: Schwarz K-P (ed) Geodesy beyond 2000 - the challenges of the first decade. IAG general assembly, Birmingham, July 19–30, 1999, IAG symposia, vol 121. Springer, Berlin, pp 163–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (2001) Variational methods in geoid determination and function bases. Phys Chem Earth Solid Earth Geod 24(1):3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (2005) Neumann’s boundary-value problem in studies on Earth gravity field: weak solution. In: Holota P, Slaboch V (eds) 50 years of Research Institute of Geodesy, Topography and Cartography, Prague, vol 50, No 36. Research Institute of Geodesy, Topography and Cartography, Prague, pp 49–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P, Nesvadba O (2007) Model refinements and numerical solutions of weakly formulated boundary-value problems in physical geodesy. In: Xu P, Liu J, Dermanis A (eds) VI Hotine-Marussi symposium of theoretical and computational geodesy, Wuhan, 29 May–2 June, 2006. IAG symposia, vol 132. Springer, Berlin, pp 314–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck B (1989) On the non-linear geodetic boundary value problem for a fixed boundary surface. Bull Geod 63(1):57–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Klees R (1995) Boundary value problems and approximation of integral equations by finite elements. Manuscr Geodaet 20:345–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Klees R, van Gelderen M, Lage C, Schwab C (2001) Fast numerical solution of the linearized Molodensky problem. J Geodesy 75:349–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissl P (1981) The use of finite elements in physical geodesy. Report 313, Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Minarechová Z, Macák M, Čunderlík R, Mikula K (2015) High-resolution global gravity field modelling by the finite volume method. Stud Geophys Geod 59(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesvadba O, Holota P, Klees R (2007) A direct method and its numerical interpretation in the determination of the Earth’s gravity field from terrestrial data. In: Tregoning P, Rizos C (eds) Dynamic planet. International association of geodesy symposia, vol 130. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 370–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Rektorys K (1980) Variational methods in mathematics, science and engineering. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansò F, Sideris M (2013) Geoid determination - theory and methods. Lecture notes in earth system sciences. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaofeng B, Dingbo C (1991) The finite element method for the geodetic boundary value problem. Manuscr Geod 16:353–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Šprlák M, Fašková Z, Mikula K (2011) On the application of the coupled finite-infinite element method to the geodetic boundary value problem. Stud Geophys Geod 55:479–487

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Technical University in Prague by grant No. SGS OHK1-016/15.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Mráz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mráz, D., Bořík, M., Novotný, J. (2016). On the Convergence of the h-p Finite Element Method for Solving Boundary Value Problems in Physical Geodesy. In: Freymueller, J.T., Sánchez, L. (eds) International Symposium on Earth and Environmental Sciences for Future Generations. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 147. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2016_237

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics