Abstract
Precise measurements of the Earth’s shape, gravity field, and rotation provide critical data for many geoscientific disciplines. In order to obtain reliable data, an accurate, stable, and global reference frame is required. The International Terrestrial Reference Frame, where station positions are modeled linearly, is commonly used throughout the geoscientific community for this purpose. Mass redistribution in the geophysical fluids, namely atmosphere, oceanic, and continental hydrology, cause time dependent variations in station coordinates, and other parameters such as the geocenter coordinates. Tidally-induced loading is described in the IERS Conventions. Models for non-tidal loading are available through the Global Geophysical Fluid Center. An overview of these models is given and comparisons were carried out. Within these comparisons, the best agreement was observed between the two atmospheric models, whereas the biggest discrepancies were found between the hydrology models. The processing setup for the Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) and Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) solutions is described, with loading displacement values introduced at the observation level. By using of non-tidal loading models the RMS of the height is reduced for 93% of the GNSS stations, with a max. reduction of 50%. The model impact on the station height in Wettzell derived by GNSS, SLR and VLBI shows a good agreement. In SLR results the Blue-Sky effect is visible. Applying the loading models reduced the seasonal variations visible in the geocenter time series derived by SLR almost completely.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altamimi Z, Collilieux X, Métivier L (2011) Itrf2008: an improved solution of the international terrestrial reference frame. J Geodesy 85(8):457–473. doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0444-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0444-4
Blewitt G (2003) Self-consistency in reference frames, geocenter definition, and surface loading of the solid Earth. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 108(B2). doi:10.1029/2002JB002082
Dach R, Böhm J, Lutz S, Steigenberger P, Beutler G (2011) Evaluation of the impact of atmospheric pressure loading modeling on GNSS data analysis. J Geodesy 85(2):75–91. doi:10.1007/s00190-010-0417-z
Eriksson D, MacMillan DS (2014) Continental hydrology loading observed by VLBI measurements. J Geodesy 88(7):675–690. doi:10.1007/s00190-014-0713-0
Fritsche M, Döll P, Dietrich R (2012) Global-scale validation of model-based load deformation of the Earth’s crust from continental watermass and atmospheric pressure variations using GPS. J Geodyn 59–60:133–142. doi:10.1016/j.jog.2011.04.001
Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Jenne R, Joseph D (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–470
Kim SB, Lee T, Fukumori I (2007) Mechanisms controlling the interannual variation of mixed layer temperature averaged over the Niño-3 region. J Climate 20:3822–3843. doi:10.1175/JCLI4206.1
Otsubo T, Kubo-oka T, Gotoh T, Ichikawa R (2004) Atmospheric loading “Blue-Sky” effects on SLR station coordinates. In: Proceedings from the fourteenth international workshop on laser ranging instrumentation, San Fernando
Petrov L, Boy JB (2004) Study of the atmospheric pressure loading signal in very long baseline interferometry observations. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 109(B3). doi:10.1029/2003JB002500
Rodell M, Houser PR, Jambor U, Gottschalck J, Mitchell K, Meng CJ, Arsenault K, Cosgrove B, Radakovich J, Bosilovich M, Entin JK, Walker JP, Lohmann D, Toll D (2004) The global land data assimilation system. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85:381–394
Sośnica K, Thaller D, Dach R, Jäggi A, Beutler G (2013) Impact of loading displacements on SLR-derived parameters and on the consistency between GNSS and SLR results. J Geodesy 87:751–769. doi:10.1007/s00190-013-0644-1
Thaller D, Sośnica K, Dach R, Jäggi A, Beutler G, Mareyen M, Richter B (2014) Geocenter coordinates from GNSS and combined GNSS-SLR solutions using satellite co-locations. In: Rizos C, Willis P (eds) Earth on the edge: science for a sustainable planet. International association of geodesy symposia, vol 139. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 129–134. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37222-3_16
Van Dam T, Collilieux X, Wuite J, Altamimi Z, Ray J (2012) Nontidal ocean loading: amplitudes and potential effects in GPS height time series. J Geodesy 86(11):1043–1057. doi:10.1007/s00190-012-0564-5
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) as a part of the Research Project (FOR1503): Space-Time Reference Systems for Monitoring Global Change and for Precise Navigation in Space.
We would like to thank the Global Geophysical Fluid Center for providing information and assistance regarding the non-tidal loading models.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Roggenbuck, O., Thaller, D., Engelhardt, G., Franke, S., Dach, R., Steigenberger, P. (2015). Loading-Induced Deformation Due to Atmosphere, Ocean and Hydrology: Model Comparisons and the Impact on Global SLR, VLBI and GNSS Solutions. In: van Dam, T. (eds) REFAG 2014. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 146. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_214
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_214
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45628-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45629-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)