Skip to main content

Determination of the Loading Mode Dependence of the Proportionality Parameter for the Tearing Energy of Embedded Flaws in Elastomers Under Multiaxial Deformations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fatigue Crack Growth in Rubber Materials

Part of the book series: Advances in Polymer Science ((POLYMER,volume 286))

Abstract

In this paper, the relationship between the tearing energy and the far-field cracking energy density (CED) is evaluated for an embedded penny-shaped flaw in a 3D elastomer body under a range of loading modes. A 3D finite element model of the system is used to develop a computational-based fracture mechanics approach which is used to evaluate the tearing energy at the crack in different multiaxial loading states. By analysing the tearing energy’s relationship to the far-field CED, the proportionality parameter in the CED formulation is found to be a function of stretch and biaxiality. Using a definition of biaxiality that gives a unique value for each loading mode, the proportionality parameter becomes a linear function of stretch and biaxiality. Tearing energies predicted through the resulting equation show excellent agreement to those calculated computationally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Inglis CE (1913) Stresses in a plate due to the presence of cracks and sharp corners. Trans Inst Nav Arch 55:219–239

    Google Scholar 

  2. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 221:163–198

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rivlin RS, Thomas AG (1953) Rupture of rubber. I Characteristic energy for tearing. J Polym Sci 10:291–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Greensmith HW (1963) Rupture of rubber. X. The change in stored energy on making a small cut in a test piece held in simple extension. J Appl Polym Sci 7:993–1002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindley PB (1972) Energy for crack growth in model rubber components. J Strain Anal Eng Des 7:132–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lake GJ (1970) Application of fracture mechanics to failure in rubber articles, with particular reference to groove cracking in tyres. In: International conference yield, deformation and fracture of polymers. Plastics and Rubber Institute, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  7. Klüppel M, Huang G, Bandow B (2008) Evaluation of tearing energy of elastomer materials. Kautschuk, Gummi, Kunststoffe 61:656–659

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yeoh OH (2002) Relation between crack surface displacements and strain energy release rate in thin rubber sheets. Mech Mater 34:459–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mars WV (2006) Heuristic approach for approximating energy release rates of small cracks under finite strain, multiaxial loading. In: Coveney VA (ed) Elastomers and components: service life prediction – progress and challenges, 1st edn. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, pp 91–111

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zine A, Benseddiq N, Naït AM, Aït HN, Bouami D (2006) Prediction of rubber fatigue life under multiaxial loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 29:267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ayoub G, Naït-Abdelaziz M, Zaïri F, Gloaguen JM, Charrier P (2011) A continuum damage model for the high-cycle fatigue life prediction of styrene-butadiene rubber under multiaxial loading. Int J Solids Struct 48:2458–2466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mars WV, Fatemi A (2005) Multiaxial fatigue of rubber: part I: equivalence criteria and theoretical aspects. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 28:515–522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mars WV, Fatemi A (2006) Analysis of fatigue life under complex loading: revisiting Cadwell, Merrill, Sloman, and Yost. Rubber Chem Technol 79:589–601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ayoub G, Naït-Abdelaziz M, Zaïri F (2014) Multiaxial fatigue life predictors for rubbers: application of recent developments to a carbon-filled SBR. Int J Fatigue 66:168–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Poisson JL, Méo S, Lacroix F, Berton G, Hosséini M, Ranganathan N (2018) Comparison of fatigue criteria under proportional and non-proportional multiaxial loading. Rubber Chem Technol 91:320–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gough J, Muhr AH (2005) Energy release rates for small cracks in rubber components. In: Austrell P-E, Kari L (eds) Constitutive models for rubber IV: proceedings of the fourth European conference on constitutive models for rubber, 1st edn. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 51–57

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yeoh OH (2006) Strain energy release rates for some classical rubber test pieces by finite element analysis. In: Coveney VA (ed) Elastomers and components: service life prediction – progress and challenges, 1st edn. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, pp 75–89

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ogden RW (1972) Large deformation isotropic elasticity - on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 326:565–584

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Asare S, Busfield JJC (2011) Fatigue life prediction of bonded rubber components at elevated temperature. Plast Rubber Compos 40:194–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wadham-Gagnon M, Hubert P, Semler C, Paidoussis MP, Vezina M, Lavoie D (2006) Hyperelastic modeling of rubber in commercial finite element software (ANSYS). In: Proceedings of the SAMPE '06: creating new opportunities for the world economy

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Schlumberger for funding and supporting this research. They would also like to thank Clwyd Compounders for providing the elastomers used.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. J. C. Busfield .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Windslow, R.J., Hohenberger, T.W., Busfield, J.J.C. (2020). Determination of the Loading Mode Dependence of the Proportionality Parameter for the Tearing Energy of Embedded Flaws in Elastomers Under Multiaxial Deformations. In: Heinrich, G., Kipscholl, R., StoÄŤek, R. (eds) Fatigue Crack Growth in Rubber Materials. Advances in Polymer Science, vol 286. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/12_2020_66

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics