Skip to main content

FAIR Data Infrastructure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart Biolabs of the Future

Part of the book series: Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology ((ABE,volume 182))

Abstract

In this chapter the concept of research data management is highlighted in the context of the data publication and data infrastructures. One focus of this contribution lies on the topics of metadata and the FAIR data principles associated with data sharing and data infrastructures such as data repositories. The challenges for researchers and research communities towards open science are discussed and the first steps towards FAIR data infrastructures are illustrated.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    FAIR is the abbreviation for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Re-usable (for further explanation see also chapter 4 “Fair Data Principles”, p. 5ff and FAIR principles at website of GO FAIR initiative [1]).

References

  1. GO FAIR. FAIR principles. Available online from https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  2. CCSDS (2012) Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS). Recommendation for space data system practices. Washington DC (recommended practice, 650.0-M-2). Available online from https://public.ccsds.org/pubs/650x0m2.pdf

  3. Kindling M et al (2013) Forschungsdatenmanagement an Hochschulen: das Beispiel der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. In: LIBREAS. Library Ideas (23). Available online from https://libreas.eu/ausgabe23/07kindling/. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  4. Jones S et al. (2013) Research data management for librarians. Hg. v. Digital Curation Centre. Available online from https://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/events/RDM-for-librarians/RDM-for-librarians-booklet.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  5. Atici L, Whitcher KS, Justin L-T, Kansa Eric C (2013) Other People’s data. A demonstration of the imperative of publishing primary data. J Archaeol Method Theory 20(4):663–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-012-9132-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Corti L, van den Eynden V, Bishop L, Woollard M (2014) Managing and sharing research data. A guide to good practice. SAGE, Los Angeles. Available online from https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/manage-data/handbook. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

    Google Scholar 

  7. Piwowar HA, Carlson JD, Vision TJ (2011) Beginning to track 1000 datasets from public repositories into the published literature. Proc Am Soc Info Sci Tech 48(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell P (2009) Data’s shameful neglect. Nature 461(7261):145. https://doi.org/10.1038/461145a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ridsdale C, Rothwell J, Smit M, Bliemel M, Irvine D, Kelley D et al (2015) Strategies and best practices for data literacy education. Knowledge synthesis report. Dalhousie University, SSHRC (Technical Report). Available online from https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1922.5044

  10. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJJ, Gabrielle A, Myles A, Arie B et al (2016) The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 3:160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Haynes D (2018) Metadata for information management and retrieval. Understanding metadata and its use. 2nd edn. Facet Publishing, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenberg J (2002) Metadata and the World Wide Web. In: Kent A (ed) Encyclopedia of library and information science. Dekker, New York, pp 244–261

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smiraglia R (2005) Introducing metadata. In: Smiraglia R (ed) Metadata. A cataloger’s primer. Haworth Information Press, Binghampton

    Google Scholar 

  14. Corrado EM, Moulaison HL (2017) Digital preservation for libraries, archives, and museums.2nd edn. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gilliland AJ (2016) Setting the stage. In: Baca M (ed) Introduction to metadata3rd edn. Getty Research Institute (Getty Research Institute publications program), Los Angeles. Available online from https://www.getty.edu/publications/intrometadata/setting-the-stage/. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

    Google Scholar 

  16. Research Data Alliance Metadata Standards Directory Working Group (ed) RDA Metadata Standards Directory. Available online from https://rd-alliance.github.io/metadata-directory/standards/. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  17. Berman F, Wilkinson R, Wood J (2014) Building global infrastructure for data sharing and exchange through the research data alliance. D-Lib Mag 20(1/2). https://doi.org/10.1045/january2014-berman

  18. Berman F, Crosas M (2020) 2.1. Harvard Data Sci Rev. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.5e126552

  19. The Future of Research Communications and e-Scholarship (ed) The FAIR Data Principles. Available online from https://www.force11.org/group/fairgroup/fairprinciples. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  20. Kraft A (2017) The FAIR data principles for research data. Hg. v. TIB Blog. Technische Informationsbibliothek. Available online from https://blogs.tib.eu/wp/tib/2017/09/12/the-fair-data-principles-for-research-data/

  21. GO FAIR. GO FAIR initiative. Available online from https://www.go-fair.org/go-fair-initiative/. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  22. FAIRsFAIR project. Available online from https://www.fairsfair.eu/. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  23. Research Data Alliance (ed) RDA Groups. Available online from https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  24. EOSC Secretariat (2019) FAIR Working Group. Available online from https://www.eoscsecretariat.eu/working-groups/fair-working-group. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  25. Mons B, Cameron N, Jan V, Michel D, Santos d S, Bonino LO, Wilkinson Mark D (2017) Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR data guiding principles for the European Open Science Cloud. ISU 37(1):49–56. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-170824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thompson M, Burger K, Kaliyaperumal R, Roos M, Santos d S, Bonino LO (2020) Making FAIR easy with FAIR tools. From creolization to convergence. Data Intell 2(1–2):87–95. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilkinson MD, Verborgh R, da Silva Santos B, Olavo L, Tim C, Swertz Morris A, Kelpin Fleur DL et al (2017) Interoperability and FAIRness through a novel combination of Web technologies. PeerJ Comput Sci 3(Suppl 1):e110. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kitchin R (2014) The data revolution. Big data, open data, data infrastructures & their consequences. SAGE, Los Angeles

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Ribes D, Jackson SJ (2013) Data bite man: the work of sustaining long-term study. In: Gitelman L (ed) “Raw data” is an oxymoron. The MIT Press (Infrastructures Series), Cambridge, pp 147–166

    Google Scholar 

  30. Goldstein S (2017) The evolving landscape of federated research data infrastructures. Knowledge Exchange. Zenodo. Available online from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1064730

  31. Technical University of Denmark (ed) DTU Data. Available online from https://data.dtu.dk/. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  32. Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (ed) Cambridge Structural Database. Available online from https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/solutions/csd-core/components/csd/. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  33. CERN (ed) Zenodo repository. Available online from https://www.zenodo.org/. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  34. Pampel H, Paul V, Frank S, Roland B, Maxi K, Jens K et al (2013) Making research data repositories visible: the re3data.org registry. PLoS One 8(11):e78080. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. UK Data Archive. Available online from https://www.data-archive.ac.uk/. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  36. Nationale Forschungsdateninfrastruktur (NFDI). Available online from https://www.nfdi.de/?lang=en. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  37. RfII – German Council for Scientific Information Infrastructures (2016) Enhancing research data management: performance through diversity. Recommendations regarding structures, processes, and financing for research data management in Germany. Göttingen. Available online from https://rfii.de/download/rfii-recommendations-2016-performance-through-diversity/. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  38. NFDI4Chem – Chemistry Consortium in the NFDI. Available online from https://www.nfdi4chem.de/. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  39. Steinbeck C, Oliver K, Felix B, Sonja H-P, Nicole J, Johannes L et al (2020) NFDI4Chem – towards a national research data infrastructure for chemistry in Germany. RIO 6. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e55852

  40. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission) (2016) Realising the European open science cloud: first report and recommendations of the commission high level expert group on the European open science cloud. Luxembourg. Available online from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/940154. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  41. European Commission Expert Group on FAIR Data (2018) Turning FAIR into reality. Final Report and Action Plan on FAIR Data. Hg. v. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission). Available online from https://doi.org/10.2777/1524

  42. European Commission (2021) European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). What the cloud is, how it was developed and being implemented. Available online from https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/strategy-2020-2024/our-digital-future/open-science/european-open-science-cloud-eosc_en. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  43. Allotrope Foundation. Available online from https://www.allotrope.org/. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  44. Allotrope Foundation (ed) About us. Available online from https://www.allotrope.org/about-us. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  45. Allotrope Foundation (ed) The Allotrope Framework. Available online from https://www.allotrope.org/allotrope-framework. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

  46. Schäfer BA, Poetz D, Kramer GW (2004) Documenting laboratory workflows using the analytical information markup language. J Assoc Lab Autom 9(6):375–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jala.2004.10.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. European Commission (ed) Horizon Europe funding program. Available online from https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe_en. Accessed 29 Dec 2021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janna Neumann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Neumann, J. (2022). FAIR Data Infrastructure. In: Beutel, S., Lenk, F. (eds) Smart Biolabs of the Future. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, vol 182. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2021_193

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics