Abstract
This article argues that we should not abandon the noun ‘organization’ in favour of the verb ‘organizing’ in order to capture processes of change, flow and movement, but instead explore how such processes reveal themselves when the concept of organization diverges from the objects it is supposed to encapsulate. Here I make use of Adorno’s critique of identity thinking in order to show how the experience of organizational phenomena remains trapped within a contradiction: concepts are needed to describe objects even though concepts can never fully exhaust the objects they describe. However, I maintain that it is precisely this discrepancy between concepts and objects that provides us the opportunity to experience the elusive state of organizations and their processual nature. Consequently, this article shows how organizational phenomena are always more complex, temporal and dynamic than what the concept of organization permits us to grasp.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adorno, T.W. 1983. Negative dialectics. New York: Continuum.
Adorno, T.W. 2002a. Introduction to sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Adorno, T.W. 2002b. Metaphysics: Concept and problems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Adorno, T. W. (2006) Aesthetic theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Adorno, T.W. 2008. Lectures on negative dialectics: Fragments of a lecture course 1965/1966. Cambridge: Polity.
Bakken, T., and T. Hernes. 2006. Organizing is both a verb and a noun: Weick meets whitehead. Organization Studies 27 (11): 1599–1616.
Benson, J.K. 1977. Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly 22 (1): 1–21.
Bernstein, J.M. 2004. Negative dialectic as fate: Adorno and Hegel. In The Cambridge companion to Adorno, ed. T. Huhn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chia, R. 1995. From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organization Studies 16 (4): 579–604.
Chia, R. 1999. A “rhizomic” model of organizational change and transformation: Perspective from a metaphysics of change. British Journal of Management 10 (3): 209–227.
Clegg, S.R., M. Kornberger, and C. Rhodes. 2005. Learning/becoming/organizing. Organization 12 (2): 147–167.
Cooper, R. 1986. Organization/Disorganization. Social Science Information 25 (2): 299–335.
Cooper, R. 1998. Assemblage notes. In Organized worlds, ed. R. Chia, 131–180. London: Routledge.
Cooper, R. 2005. Peripheral vision: Relationality. Organization Studies 26 (11): 1689–1710.
Cunliffe, A.L. 2008. Organization theory. Los Angeles and London: SAGE.
Curtis, R. 2014. Foucault beyond Fairclough: From transcendental to immanent critique in organization studies. Organization Studies 35 (12): 1753–1772.
Guthey, E., and B. Jackson. 2005. CEO portraits and the authenticity paradox. Journal of Management Studies 42 (5): 1057–1082.
Hatch, M.J., and A.L. Cunliffe. 2013. Organization theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Helin, J. 2015. Writing process after reading Bakhtin from theorized plots to unfinalizable “living” events. Journal of Management Inquiry 24 (2): 174–185.
Helin, J., T. Hernes, D. Hjorth, and R. Holt, eds. 2014. The Oxford handbook of process philosophy and organization studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hernes, T. 2007. Understanding organization as process: Theory for a tangled world. London: Routledge.
Hernes, T., and E. Weik. 2007. Organization as process: Drawing a line between endogenous and exogenous views. Scandinavian Journal of Management 23 (3): 251–264.
Hirsch, M., and D.Z. Levin. 1999. Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science 10 (2): 199–212.
Jameson, F. 2007. Late marxism: Adorno, or, the persistence of the dialectic. London: Verso.
Jarvis, S. 1998. Adorno: A critical introduction. New York: Routledge.
King, B.G., T. Felin, and D.A. Whetten. 2010. Perspective - finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organization Science 21 (1): 290–305.
Linstead, S., and T. Thanem. 2007. Multiplicity, virtuality and organization: The contribution of Gilles Deleuze. Organization Studies 28 (10): 1483–1501.
Lopdrup-Hjorth, T. 2015. Object and objective lost? Journal of Cultural Economy 8 (4): 439–461.
Mintzberg, H. 1983. Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Munro, I., and C. Huber. 2012. Kafka’s mythology: Organization, bureaucracy and the limits of sensemaking. Human Relations 65 (4): 523–543.
Nayak, A. 2008. On the way to theory: A processual approach. Organization Studies 29 (2): 173–190.
Neimark, M., and T. Tinker. 1987. Identity and non-identity thinking: Dialectical critique of the transaction cost theory of the modern corporation. Journal of Management 13 (4): 661–673.
O’Doherty, D.P. 2007. The question of theoretical excess: Folly and fall in theorizing organization. Organization 14 (6): 837–867.
Parker, M. 2007. Organizing: Skyscrapers and multitudes. Critical Perspectives on International Business 3 (3): 220–225.
Parker, M. 2016. Secret societies: Intimations of organization. Organization Studies 37 (1): 99–113.
Reed, M. 2011. The post-bureaucratic organization and the control revolution. In Managing modernity: Beyond bureaucracy? ed. S.R. Clegg, M. Harris, and H. Höpfl. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rhodes, C. 2009. After reflexivity: Ethics, freedom and the writing of organization studies. Organization Studies 30 (6): 653–672.
Robbins, S.P. 1990. Organization theory: Structures, designs and applications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Scott, W.R. 1998. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Shotter, J. 2006. Understanding process from within: An argument for ‘withness’-thinking. Organization Studies 27: 585–604.
Sørensen, B.M. 2004. Making events work: Or, how to multiply your crisis. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
Spoelstra, S. 2007. What is organization? Lund: Lund University.
Stone, A. 2014. Adorno, Hegel, and dialectic. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22: 1118–1141.
Tsoukas, H. 2005. Complex knowledge: Studies in organizational epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tsoukas, H., and R. Chia. 2002. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science 13: 567–582.
Tsoukas, H., and C. Knudsen. 2005. The Oxford handbook of organization theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van de Ven, A.H., and M.S. Poole. 2005. Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organization Studies 26 (9): 1377–1404.
Weick, K.E. 1979. The social psychology of organizing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Weick, K.E. 1993. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The mann gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (4): 628–652.
Weick, K.E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.
Weick, K.E., K.M. Sutcliffe, and D. Obstfeld. 2005. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science 16 (4): 409–421.
Weik, E. 2011. In deep waters: Process theory between Scylla and Charybdis. Organization 18 (5): 655–672.
Willmott, H. 2014. Conceptually grounded analysis: The elusive facticity and ethical upshot of “Organization”. In Critical management research: reflections from the field, ed. Emma Jeanes and Tony Huzzard. London: Sage.
Zundel, M., R. Holt, and J. Cornelissen. 2013. Institutional work in the wire an ethological investigation of flexibility in organizational adaptation. Journal of Management Inquiry 22: 102–120.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest Statement
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnsen, C.G. Who’s Afraid of Organization? Concepts, Process and Identity Thinking. Philosophy of Management 17, 303–319 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-017-0079-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-017-0079-5